If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
One SHORT post per day - help make CHIROPRACTIC HISTORY...
PREGNANT WOMEN: Please forward this email to your chiropractor.
MDs are closing birth canals and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines. I want DCs to take action to stop this obvious crime. It's easy to OPEN your birth canal - just roll onto your side - be forewarned - some MDs will roll you back to semisitting - close your birth canal! - as your baby comes out! Email me for details. AHC Member Nancy Colin Fontanella, DC wrote: "I'm sorry!!! It's not AOL, it's me. I didn't save the letter with the instructions. P-L-E-A-S-E send them again and I will send the letter off post haste. Thanks for the quote. It will be helpful. If I seem a little flakey perhaps I am but I'm always going here and there and doing this and never seem to have time to catch up." AHC = Association for the History of Chiropractic Nancy, No apology necessary. There is nothing "flakey" about being extremely busy. TO SAVE TIME - see the very end of this post... Six babies per DAY are dying from gruesome TRACTION spinal manipulation by MD-obstetricians. See again: Babies vacuumed to death (also: MRI sex - again) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2095 To be sure, sometimes traction spinal manipulation (pulling with forceps and/or vacuum) can save a tiny life... But - and this is my PRIORITY question: WHY are we letting MDs deliver babies with birth canals closed up to 30% - and why are we letting MDs perform traction spinal manipulation with birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%?! Please ask all chiropractic entities/organizations you can think of... Please ask all MEDICAL entities/organizations you can think of... It wouldn't hurt to mention that MDs are also PUSHING on tiny spines with birth canals closed up to 30% - or rather - MDs are forcing UTERI to push with birth canals closed - and when the going gets rough - MDs chemically whip uteri to contract VIOLENTLY - with oxytocin and/or Cytotec - with birth canals closed up to 30%! Nancy, surely one short post per day is doable... Maybe you could start with an email to Association for the History of Chiropractic/AHC officers (email addresses listed below) simply asking them if they will forward your post to their fellow AHC officer, Virginia Medical Board Member Jerry Willis, DC? NOTE: For my first post to Jerry Willis, DC (via the Virginia Medical Board)... See Is 'energy work' spinal manipulation? If so, MDs do BAD 'energy work' (!) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2078 Virginia Medical Board Exec. Dir. William Harp, MD wrote back (automated response?) and said I had to name an individual MD... So I named an individual MD... See MD birth crime: Gastaldo names individual MD... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2082 (I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. MDs are just academic prime cuts forced through this culture's most powerful mental meatgrinder - medical school.) MAYBE the Virgina Medical Board is doing what I asked.. But I suspect not - the MD spinal manipulation crime is huge and like the rest of us MDs are loathe to admit mistakes. I have received no further response from them... Nancy, in spite of the fact that I myself am sending this to AHC officers (I just now spoke with AHC Pres. Dr. Arthur Lensgraf; see PS1)...inspite of the fact that I am archiving this post for global access ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2098) I am still hoping you too will ask AHC officers if they will join you (and me) in asking their fellow AHC officer Jerry Willis, DC to simply ask the Virginia Medical Board (of which he is a member) to simply ask MDs to stop closing birth canals. Please copy me when you do. (Again, see TO SAVE TIME at the very end of this post.) Remember Nancy: It's sort of a CHIROPRACTIC EMERGENCY: Six babies per DAY are dying...and MDs are lying...as MDs close birth canals and gruesomely manipulate most babies' spines. Help make CHIROPRACTIC HISTORY Nancy: Help save tiny lives and tiny limbs - help PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS1 WAIT A MINUTE! HOLD THE PHONE! I still want you to email the AHC officers Nancy - but check *this* out! On a lark, I just telephoned Arthur Lensgraf, DC, AHC Pres... Arthur did not remember any email from me. He said he often doesn't open email if he doesn't recognize the sender. I noted that MDs are closing birth canals. He seemed genuinely surprised and asked me to send an email. He asked me what the title would be so he would know not to delete it. Since I was writing "One SHORT post per day" to you - I gave that title to him... I will be sending this post to everyone - and posting it for global access... Arthur said that if I sent him hard copy he would give a copy to all AHC board members when they convene for their mid-year meeting in Nashville in three weeks. Arthur, CHIROPRACTIC EMERGENCY! Six babies per day are DYING in part due to gruesome spinal manipulation by MDs Please IMMEDIATELY forward this to Jerry Willis, DC and simply ask him to ask the Virginia Medical Board (of which he is a member) to simply ask MDs to stop closing birth canals. Maybe Jerry will be able to report in three weeks (at your AHC meeting in Nashville) that he has made CHIROPRACTIC HISTORY in Virginia by stopping the gruesome spinal manipulation of the most prolific spinal manipulators - MD-obstetricians. AHC officers could (at that meeting) resolve to make similar CHIROPRACTIC HISTORY worldwide! Again, Nancy, I still want you to email the AHC officers just so I'm not the only one encouraging them to contact Jerry and take action themselves... PS2 Here are the full addresses of the 2003 AHC BOARD... http://www.chiroweb.com/ahc/officers.html President Arthur Lensgraf, DC 3827 Cleghorn Ave., Nashville, TN 37215 615-383-5575 Past President P. Reginald Hug, DC 3153 Cahaba Heights Road, POB 43547, Birmingham, AL 35243 205-967-0280 1st Vice President Jerry Ray Willis, DC 570 E. Main, Wytheville, VA 24382 540-228-5806 (via Alana Callender and John C. Willis, DC, email addresses below) 2nd Vice President Bart Green, DC, MSEd, DACBSP Palmer College of Chiropractic West 90 E. Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA 95134 866-303-7939 or (408) 944-6000 Secretary Kenneth Young, DC, DACBR, FCC (U.K.) Welsh Institute of Chiropractic University of Glamorgan Pontypridd, Wales, CF37 1DL, Wales, UK 011-44-1443-483-735 011-44-1443-483-756 (FAX) Executive Director Alana Callender, MS 1000 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803 563-884-5404 Directors William Holmberg, DC 1000 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803 563-884-5626 Joseph C. Keating, Jr., PhD 6135 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85012 602-264-3182 Edward D. McKenzie, DC 928 West 6th St., Holton, KS 66436 785-364-4151 Kenneth Padgett, DC New York Chiropractic College 2360 State Route 89, Seneca Falls, NY 13148 1-800-234-NYCC Lawrence Siordia, DC 7641 Knott Ave., Buena Park, CA 90620 714-952-0536 714-952-4206 (FAX) Journal Editor John C. Willis, DC P. O. Box 1045, Richlands, VA 24641 540-963-0395 PS3 Nancy, you quoted back the quote about DD that I sent... ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 5:54 PM Subject: Why I said, 'I'm glad you are a fan of DD..." In a message dated 8/9/03 11:42:10 PM, writes: Here (again) is Wardwell [1992] quoting Terrett [1986] regarding the censorship of Dr. DD Palmer... "All copies [of DD's The Chiropractor's Adjuster (1910)] were quickly bought up and destroyed. You could not get a copy anyplace at any price. In fact, you could not find a copy for 'love or money.' The leaders of the profession did not want the world to know anything about the teachings of old Dr. Daniel D. Palmer...The early leaders then greatly distorted their founder's science, philosophy and vision for chiropractic..." [Wardwell WI. Chiropractic: History and Evolution of a New Profession. St. Louis: Mosby. 1992:101 quoting Terrett Allen CJ. The genius of DD Palmer. Journal of the Australian Chiropractors' Association. 1986;16(4):150-58.] You remarked... Todd; Your letters contain a lot of information so some of it goes right by me. I read the definition of chiropractic in Dorland's when I first got mail from you. I thought it was fine but no, I do not think it is the same as D.D.'s basic hypothesis and I was uncomfortable saying so because I don't know you and didn't want to offend but I have offended you anyway by being glib. I believe his hypothesis is in the beginning of The Adjuster. I'm going to the office tomorrow and will write a longer more thoughtful letter when I reread The Adjuster. I apologize for these scribbled notes. Nancy Again Nancy, no apology necessary. I'm glad you think the Dorland's definition of chiropractic is fine. Perhaps you believe DD's fundamental chiropractic is "tone" - as in the statement on DD's title page: "Founded on Tone." (?) In any future dictionary definitions of chiropractic, I personally would like to see explicit mention of DD's notion that the body is NOT controlled by the nervous system but rather by WHAT IRRITATES the nervous system - internal or external. DD's diagnostic "trick" - that Innate forwards the same impulses in health and disease - should perhaps also be mentioned. It is central to DD's notion of ASSUMING healthy impulses are being sent by Innate - which - conveniently - makes it the doctor's job to look for mech/chem/psychic irritants in the internal or external environments when someone is sick. I sent a copy of the 1988 Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary to the late WD Harper before he died - and he was elated. He said, "You must have had help." I said, "I *did* - you and Anything Can Cause Anything - and the 1966 ACA Commission for the Standards of Chiropractic Principles," or words to that effect. Regarding whether the Dorland's definition is the same as DD's basic hypothesis... I'm looking forward to your "more thoughtful letter." (!) Nancy, I've asked you befo Doesn't it seem odd to you that NO ONE (not AHC not ACA not ICA - NO ONE) is discussing the fact that - at my request - Dorland's made (what *I* believe to be) DD's fundamental chiropractic hypothesis the definition of chiropractic? At the very least they could take pot shots at Dorland's new/old definition of chiropractic! Some CHIROPRACTIC HISTORY... In 1999, ACA unsuccessfully/quietly tried to CENSOR DD's fundamental chiropractic hypothesis from Dorland's - saying that Dorland's had written to ACA for input. ACA "forgot" to mention that AT MY REQUEST Dorland's wrote to ACA and about 12 other chiro organizations/entities YEARS previously - requesting definition input. I had asked Dorland's to do this because *no one responded* when I asked for such input before the first publication of "my" definition in Dorland's in 1988 - and because I wanted to see some input from the profession before Dorland's published "my" definition again in 1994. (NOTE: I got "my" definition from Dr. DD Palmer via WD Harper's Anything Can Cause Anything and ACA's Highest Obligation - the latter is STILL imbedded in ACA's Master Plan!) I have NO problem with censorship attempts as long as they are made *in the open* - with plenty of public discussion. It was ACA's failure to act on my early 90s suggestion of a chiropractic definition consensus conference that (most recently) persuaded Dorland's Chief Lexicographer Anderson to publish "my" definition again in a third edition of Dorland's (2000). Initially Anderson was resistant because "ACA is the largest chiropractic association" (or words to that effect) but I simply pointed out to him that ACA was STILL failing to hold/co-sponsor a chiropractic definition consensus conference - which - again - was the reason he originally wrote to 13 chiropractic entities/organizations at my request. BEWA ACA IS TRYING TO GET CHIROS TO JUMP INTO THE LATE ED MAURER'S NEUROMUSCULOSKELETAL BOX! (Remember the "failed" merger between ACA and ICA? I don't think it was a complete failure. Neuromusculoskeletal chiropractic is not all that far away from BJ-"straight" spinal cultism - the latest manifestation of which is Rondberg's current (Manzullo?) bill before Congress... PS4 BJ-"straight" spinal cultism - and neuromusculoskeletal chiropractic - have "triumphed" in California... I recently wrote to "Dr. Enzyme," Anthony Cichoke, DC (pronounced she-CO-ki)... "Chiropractic Education...include[s]...OBSTETRICS..." --American Chiropractic Association/ACA Chairman James Edwards, DC and Cynthia Vaughn, DC http://www.jamesedwards.com/educate.htm (emphasis added) "Obstetrics is the art of midwifery...If the accoucheur is a Chiropractor, he can adjust...thereby preventing disease." --Dr. DD Palmer, Founder of Chiropractic [1910:789] Chiropractic physicians don't *need* to attend births - don't need to practice obstetrics or midwifery - to adjust to prevent disease! Dr. Cichoke, There is a strike against me...by a politically powerful person... In the interest of full disclosure, I think you should know about it. I was sued for libel by former Calif. Republican Party Chairman Attorney Michael Schroeder (who I believe is in bed with the MD-obstetricians; see below). I couldn't afford to go to Calif. to defend the lawsuit; so I spent $2,000 plus dollars challenging jurisdiction in an unsuccessful attempt to get it moved to Oregon. In my absence, the judge lined through Schroeder's one million dollar petition and awarded him a default judgement of $25,000. That default judgement still stands. It is a legal judgement against me - albeit an unfair one. Or so I say... Just the same - beware... SOME HISTORY... In the late 80s, before he became the Calif. Republican Party Chair, Attorney Schroeder, as attorney for the Calif. Chiropractic Association, wrote a Calif. chiropractic regulation known as "Rule 302." (Thanks to "chiropractic" Attorney Schroeder's Rule 302 - MDs can *gruesomely* manipulate most babies' spines at birth and sometimes sever spinal nerves - and California DCs can't even sever umbilical cords!) Attorney Schroeder got the Calif. Chiro. Board to adopt his Rule 302. In one swell foop, California DCs - who attended thousands of births - were suddenly prohibited from so much as severing umbilical cords. (!) 10 MD-obstetricians sued the Calif Chiro. Bd (!)... Schroeder was selected as the Calif. Chiropractic Board's attorney... The MD-obstetricians "lost the case" as Schroeder reportedly earned hundreds of thousands in DC licensing fees in the process... But I say the MD-obstetricians did NOT lose (!) - they got exactly what they wanted - they got Schroeder's Rule 302 *judicially rubberstamped*. (!) Former law professor David Prescott later publicly opined that Schroeder's Rule 302 UNLAWFULLY restricted the chiropractic scope of practice in California. See Homebirth - Sonoma County can save money - maybe Dr. Dubin will help? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1844 If *Prescott* was/is right - if Schroeder's Rule 302 "unlawfully" restricts the chiropractic scope - then *I* was right in my "libel" - i.e. - Schroeder DID bilk the chiropractic profession out of hundreds of thousands in DC licensing fees (or however many thousands he "earned"). REGARDLESS though whether Prescott (or I) am right - WHY is "chiropractic" attorney Schroeder failing to go after the MD-obstetricians for closing birth canals and gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines at birth? KEY POINT Back when I was still California-licensed - a man calling himself Schroeder - attorney for the Calif. Chiro Board - told me by telephone that it was outside my scope of practice to tell pregnant women about what MDs were doing - which is why I let my Calif. license go inactive... One needs neither license nor degree to expose obvious lies and bogus research in the medical literature. "Chiropractic" attorney Schroeder *has* his default judgement against me - WHY isn't he going after the MD-obstetricians who ostensibly "attacked" his Rule 302? Chiros are missing a GOLDEN opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. END Gastaldo's post to Dr. Cichoke, slightly edited... PS5 Nancy, I noted at the very end of one of the posts I sent that Dorland's Chief Lexicographer Douglas Anderson at my request also changed Dorland's definition of "doctor" to include graduates of chiropractic colleges. Anderson took the opportunity to include other professionals besides MDs, as in, "doctor...one who has received a degree from a college of medicine, osteopathy, chiropractic, optometry, podiatry, pharmacy, dentistry, or veterinary medicine, licensed to practice by a state." Of course, being unlicensed by choice, I sort of disagree with the "licensed to practice by a state" part of this new Dorland's definition of "doctor." : ) Again, the KEY POINT from PS4: Back when I was still California-licensed - a man calling himself Schroeder - attorney for the Calif. Chiro Board - told me by telephone that it was outside my scope of practice to tell pregnant women about what MDs were doing - which is why I let my Calif. license go inactive... One needs neither license nor degree to expose obvious lies and bogus research in the medical literature. "Chiropractic" attorney Schroeder *has* his default judgement against me - WHY isn't he going after the MD-obstetricians who ostensibly "attacked" his Rule 302? Why aren't the chiropractic trade unions working to stop MDs from closing birth canals? Why aren't they working to stop the massive MD spinal manipulation crime? Nancy, I made to decision to post this response publicly because I *may* soon be censored from posting to Yahoo... IN THE EVENT YAHOO BELIEVES... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yahoo!" To: Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:28 AM Subject: Yahoo! Groups Dear Yahoo! account holder: By creating and using your Yahoo! account, you agree to abide by Yahoo!'s Terms of Service (TOS). Pursuant to the TOS, Yahoo! reserves the right to terminate your account or otherwise prohibit use of your account in the event that, among other things, Yahoo! believes that you have violated or acted inconsistently with the letter or spirit of the TOS. It has come to our attention that you may have violated the TOS. Please reread the TOS and cease any use of your account that may violate the TOS. If your use of your Yahoo! account is brought to our attention again, and we believe that such use violates the TOS, then we may terminate your account without further notice. Please do not reply to this email. Any questions concerning Yahoo!'s Services should be submitted through the on-line form in the help area ( http://help.yahoo.com ). -Yahoo! This message from Yahoo came just after I emailed all the chiro orthopedists who received: Chiro orthopedists and global UNREST - and babies... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2030 MDs who are committing massive crimes against mothers and babies - or their confederates - do not like me posting about MDs committing massive crimes against mothers and babies... Yahoo could have at least alluded to the specific REASON given by whomever complained about me. NANCY, TO SAVE TIME... JUST HIT FORWARD... Forward this post to AHC officers and just ask at the top: Why *are* chiropractors letting MDs close birth canals and gruesomely manipulate most babies' spines at birth? Cut and past these AHC officer addresses (with my address) into the "To" window... ; ; ***This article will be instantly available for global access (just in case anyone accidentally deletes it!) at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2098 Within 24 hours it will be in the google archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "One SHORT post per day - help make CHIROPRACTIC HISTORY" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
make thousands easily!! | steve | General | 0 | March 21st 04 10:06 AM |
| Most families *at risk* w CPS' assessment tools broad, vague | Kane | General | 13 | February 20th 04 06:02 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Chiro orthopedists and global UNREST - and babies... | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | July 13th 03 09:46 PM |