If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The right to abandon your child (aka: Roe v. Wade for Men) - Part 2: Tide Turns In the Gender Wars
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/03/13/...e-gender-wars/
Tide Turns In the Gender Wars March 13, 2006 Vox Populi By Christine D. Korenthal I disagree with my husband (SoCalPundit.com's Kevin Korenthal) rarely on social issues, but this is one of those few cases where I do. I think that this case is a good thing and I hope it sparks some change in this country. For far too long, women have had the upper hand in making all decisions regarding childbearing and childrearing. A woman can lie about being on birth control or, as in this case, about her ability to have children. She can tell the guy that he is on the hook when she becomes pregnant (either by deliberately misleading the guy or an honest oopsie) and then attempt to use their child as a ball and chain, a bargaining chip, or a cash cow. She can use the guy's emotional attachment to the child in order to get back at him by refusing to allow him to be as involved as he would like. And the coup de grace is that the less the guy sees the kid, the more money the woman gets in child support. This ensures that the child will see less of Daddy so that Momma can rake in the dough, while laughing at Daddy's emotional anguish. She has ALL of the power and he is at her mercy. Sound eerily familiar and one sided to anyone? I have seen this done many times and it makes me ill. Women can abort whether their partner supports it or not. They can have their child whether the partner supports it or not. The guy just has to stand by helplessly and wait for the "verdict". That is wrong. It takes two people to make a child and two people should make the decision to have it or not. Women also have the option of giving the baby up for adoption. If the father objects, he can take custody of the child but the likelyhood of receiving an order for child support from the mom is just about zip. He is pretty much on his own. If she can have the kid and "opt out" via giving up her rights and financial obligations post-birth, why can't a guy do the same pre-birth, say, within 30 days of notification? Women can get off scott free, but not men. Sounds sexist to me. If men and women are to be truly equal, as the feminists have screamed about for years, the same equality should apply to all aspects of life including procreation and childrearing. Completely equal means taking the good with the bad. Women go to college at higher rates than men in many states. Women work the same jobs as men and the "pay gap" is hardly notable and still shrinking. They want men to do half of the domestic tasks which, if they both work full time, is fair enough. If they have a child that is planned, they want the man to do half of the baby care and childrearing when junior comes into the world. But if an unplanned pregnancy occurs, even in a marriage, forget it buster. It is all her decision. If she has the child and the relationship ends, fork over the dough and pick up junior every third Thursday of the month for a couple of hours. If you want the kid and she doesn't, she can have it aborted and you can't say or do a thing to stop her, even if you are willing to take full custody and full responsibility for the child. I have seen friends, good men, get swindled into fatherhood by women who later used their children to hurt them. I have seen courts give custody to women even in cases where the father was clearly the more involved parent, simply because the woman was a woman. I have even seen one guy through the devastation of his girlfriend's abortion without his consent. A child that he wanted. I have seen what guys go through because women have the upper hand when it comes to children. Forty years ago, when most women stayed at home with the kids while men worked, when sex still meant something, when women had few methods of birth control, when "hooking up" was unheard of, our current laws might have made sense, but women have made "progress" and become equal. No, we passed equal. Now we get more protection under the law and more options on the table. I know, I know, women get the short end from guys sometimes, too, but I haven't seen that nearly so often as I have seen men get smacked down by bitter exes using babies to do their bidding. It's about time for men to get a leg up. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are OBs Bible-based? Is home schooling child abuse? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | March 15th 05 03:38 AM |
Sample US Supreme Court Petition | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 28 | January 21st 04 06:23 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Foster Parents | 3 | December 8th 03 11:53 PM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |