Midwife versus OBGYN

wrote:
Ericka Kammerer wrote:

- Unnecessary screening tests - Even if the screening
test accurately identifies the condition,
if it doesn't improve outcomes there's a
problem.

Some people have made the argument that this preeclampsia test
shouldn't be pursued, because we have nothing to offer the
preeclamptics treatment-wise, apart from delivery.

Well, considering that sometimes delivery can
be the difference between life and death, it sorta seems
to me like perhaps that would be important ;-)

I (obviously) think there's a *huge* benefit to development, because it
would allow removal of incipient preeclamptics from the pool, which
would allow vastly less intrusive management of the remaining
population.

I agree.

Best wishes,
Ericka