If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
La Moron adjunct using Univ server
Yes, posting from an edu address might open up the university to charges.
Especially when the employee doing the posting is using the imprimatur of the university in private rantings. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fern5827 wrote: Yes, posting from an edu address might open up the university to charges. Of what, for what? Especially when the employee doing the posting is using the imprimatur of the university in private rantings. You aren't aware that one can have a server at a university and not be attached in any way, that is have a private account? I had one of the first student accounts way back when I was student. Kept it for years after I matriculated. In fact, dummy, if you look up current law, the school would't even be responsible if someone posted pornography or how to build a bomb on one of their servers. They would likely take it down when notified as being inappropriate. Are you suggesting that LaVonne has said anything inappropriate here that would warrant you contacting the university and complaining? Are you aware what you open yourself up to taking any such action that might damage her professionally, in reputation or income? How is it you were so silent when a plagiarist who posts to this ng used a Texas A&M "server" E-mail account for what could be charged as a crime? Or open, if you believe your nonsense, the school to action for hosting a plagiarist? You take some pretty serious risks with your stupid accusations. Keep it up. And may you live in interesting times. Kane |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Are professors allowed to use the university
name and ID as a platform for their own political agendas? What are the Terms Of Acceptable Use? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Greegor wrote: Are professors allowed to use the university name and ID as a platform for their own political agendas? Of course. What a silly question. It's simply an account. What they cannot do is commit a crime. As someone here did using his account. By the way, you are aware, are you not, that one of your buddies here has been very silent on this issue of AUP. You do know where he posts from, right? He does have a political agenda, right? He says so, very plainly. What are the Terms Of Acceptable Use? UMinnesota's are available on line. I've read them. YOU go look them up. LaVonne did nothing proscribed by the AUP. In fact they are pretty consistent across the country, school after school. I had such an account for years. Used it for all kinds of things. Including giving my strong opinions that others would label "political." As long as I did not post to my students and express political opinions as an instructor, no problem. You twits don't understand academia in the least. Even those in it. If I stand up in a classroom as a professor on a subject and express my politics related to that subject, I am on very thin ice, but I am allowed to have political opinions about other matters and express them. I think LaVonne teaches in child development. Is anyone here a student of hers? She may say here anything she wishes, sans lawbreaking. You little cowards just want to make trouble. I, even when I detest one of you, try to keep you OUT of trouble as I did with Chris C. which he promptly ignored and defied. And greegor, I have a surprize for you. Spanking is YOUR political issue, not ours. Our issue is a humane and trauma based opposition opinion based on gathered research. That moves it to academic reseach status. You have any research to prove that spanking has long term safe and effective results? ALL you have is opinion. A weak, and vicious opinion, based on flawed information perpetuated by fear parented cowards. YOU. Are there spankers I don't place in that category? Sure, the ones that are willing to debate the issue honestly, or admit we have a difference and leave it at that. It's you sickees that keep pushing the issue when you've been rebutted successfully for years that are they ones in deep trouble. Read their archives. Kane |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Kane:
Attempting to elevate your opinions by asserting that your opponents have only opinions is funny. Naturally what YOU believe is not opinion, but ""fact"" right? You are a legend in your own mind. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Greegor wrote: Kane: Attempting to elevate your opinions by asserting that your opponents have only opinions is funny. Perhaps you could elevate your opinion on spanking to include research that supports your pro-spank position. Naturally what YOU believe is not opinion, but ""fact"" right? What about your opinion? Is your opinion a "fact?" If so, post the evidence. You are a legend in your own mind. Kane may be a legend in his own mind, but he has posted evidence for his opinions. You may be a legend in your own mind, but I have yet to see any evidence for the opinions that you post. Ever heard of projection? LaVonne |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
LaVonne:
Why would I need to prove the NORM? Shouldn't the social architects who consider themselves the heros who lead us out of our barbaric darkness with their NEW WAY be the ones to PROVE something? My proof? Eisenhower, Reagan, Clinton Guess which one was not spanked? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Greegor wrote: LaVonne: Why would I need to prove the NORM? Shouldn't the social architects who consider themselves the heros who lead us out of our barbaric darkness with their NEW WAY be the ones to PROVE something? My proof? Eisenhower, Reagan, Clinton Guess which one was not spanked? Two adulterers and someone that sent in US warplanes to bomb a man's home and kill some of his family. I know who was and wasn't spanked. I wouldn't say that any of these men has sterling performances in public or private life. It's been reported by those that worked closely with him that Ike was not that admirable. He had a very bad temper. He was well known to be a racial bigot, and regretted his appointment to the supreme court that helped integrate US schools. It is highly likely he had an adulterous affair with his aide. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...54/ai_89636759 And Reagan cowboyed us into some of the debacle we now face in the middle east. As for Clownboy, his whole legacy hasn't been written yet, but if you live long enough you'll see what "spanking" produced. And I'm not talking about his affair something I could care less about politically. Hitler was a national leader too. And straight arrow in his behaviors...except for one tiny little thing, WWII, and the holocaust. He got his share of spanking discipline. You really need to do some historical research. Or continue to enjoy making a complete fool of yourself. It obviously agrees with you or you wouldn't seek it so happily. Kane |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
So where are the "never-spanked"? Chris Dunga has, at least, offered one. :-) Doan On 28 Feb 2005, Kane wrote: Greegor wrote: LaVonne: Why would I need to prove the NORM? Shouldn't the social architects who consider themselves the heros who lead us out of our barbaric darkness with their NEW WAY be the ones to PROVE something? My proof? Eisenhower, Reagan, Clinton Guess which one was not spanked? Two adulterers and someone that sent in US warplanes to bomb a man's home and kill some of his family. I know who was and wasn't spanked. I wouldn't say that any of these men has sterling performances in public or private life. It's been reported by those that worked closely with him that Ike was not that admirable. He had a very bad temper. He was well known to be a racial bigot, and regretted his appointment to the supreme court that helped integrate US schools. It is highly likely he had an adulterous affair with his aide. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...54/ai_89636759 And Reagan cowboyed us into some of the debacle we now face in the middle east. As for Clownboy, his whole legacy hasn't been written yet, but if you live long enough you'll see what "spanking" produced. And I'm not talking about his affair something I could care less about politically. Hitler was a national leader too. And straight arrow in his behaviors...except for one tiny little thing, WWII, and the holocaust. He got his share of spanking discipline. You really need to do some historical research. Or continue to enjoy making a complete fool of yourself. It obviously agrees with you or you wouldn't seek it so happily. Kane |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Which ones were and were not spanked, Kane?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Heads-up: News Server News.CIS.DFN.DE Name Change | Elana | Breastfeeding | 0 | July 18th 03 10:09 AM |