La Moron adjunct using Univ server

Yes, posting from an edu address might open up the university to charges.

Especially when the employee doing the posting is using the imprimatur of the
university in private rantings.

Fern5827 wrote:
Yes, posting from an edu address might open up the university to
charges.

Of what, for what?

Especially when the employee doing the posting is using the
imprimatur of the
university in private rantings.

You aren't aware that one can have a server at a university and not be
attached in any way, that is have a private account?

I had one of the first student accounts way back when I was student.
Kept it for years after I matriculated.

In fact, dummy, if you look up current law, the school would't even be
responsible if someone posted pornography or how to build a bomb on one
of their servers.

They would likely take it down when notified as being inappropriate.

Are you suggesting that LaVonne has said anything inappropriate here
that would warrant you contacting the university and complaining?

Are you aware what you open yourself up to taking any such action that
might damage her professionally, in reputation or income?

How is it you were so silent when a plagiarist who posts to this ng
used a Texas A&M "server" E-mail account for what could be charged as a
crime? Or open, if you believe your nonsense, the school to action for
hosting a plagiarist?

You take some pretty serious risks with your stupid accusations. Keep
it up.

And may you live in interesting times.

Kane

Are professors allowed to use the university
name and ID as a platform for their own
political agendas?

What are the Terms Of Acceptable Use?

Greegor wrote:
Are professors allowed to use the university
name and ID as a platform for their own
political agendas?

Of course. What a silly question.
It's simply an account. What they cannot do is commit a crime. As
someone here did using his account.

By the way, you are aware, are you not, that one of your buddies here
has been very silent on this issue of AUP.

You do know where he posts from, right?

He does have a political agenda, right? He says so, very plainly.

What are the Terms Of Acceptable Use?

UMinnesota's are available on line. I've read them. YOU go look them
up. LaVonne did nothing proscribed by the AUP. In fact they are pretty
consistent across the country, school after school.

I had such an account for years. Used it for all kinds of things.
Including giving my strong opinions that others would label
"political."

As long as I did not post to my students and express political opinions
as an instructor, no problem.

You twits don't understand academia in the least. Even those in it.

If I stand up in a classroom as a professor on a subject and express my
politics related to that subject, I am on very thin ice, but I am
allowed to have political opinions about other matters and express
them.

I think LaVonne teaches in child development. Is anyone here a student
of hers?

She may say here anything she wishes, sans lawbreaking.

You little cowards just want to make trouble. I, even when I detest one
of you, try to keep you OUT of trouble as I did with Chris C. which he
promptly ignored and defied.

And greegor, I have a surprize for you. Spanking is YOUR political
issue, not ours. Our issue is a humane and trauma based opposition
opinion based on gathered research. That moves it to academic reseach
status. You have any research to prove that spanking has long term safe
and effective results?

ALL you have is opinion. A weak, and vicious opinion, based on flawed
information perpetuated by fear parented cowards. YOU.

Are there spankers I don't place in that category? Sure, the ones that
are willing to debate the issue honestly, or admit we have a difference
and leave it at that. It's you sickees that keep pushing the issue when
you've been rebutted successfully for years that are they ones in deep
trouble.

Read their archives.

Kane

Kane:
Attempting to elevate your opinions by asserting
that your opponents have only opinions is funny.
Naturally what YOU believe is not opinion, but ""fact"" right?

You are a legend in your own mind.

Greegor wrote:
Kane:
Attempting to elevate your opinions by asserting
that your opponents have only opinions is funny.

Perhaps you could elevate your opinion on spanking to include research
that supports your pro-spank position.

Naturally what YOU believe is not opinion, but ""fact"" right?

What about your opinion? Is your opinion a "fact?" If so, post the
evidence.

You are a legend in your own mind.

Kane may be a legend in his own mind, but he has posted evidence for his
opinions. You may be a legend in your own mind, but I have yet to see
any evidence for the opinions that you post.

Ever heard of projection?

LaVonne

LaVonne:
Why would I need to prove the NORM?

Shouldn't the social architects who consider themselves
the heros who lead us out of our barbaric darkness
with their NEW WAY be the ones to PROVE something?

My proof?

Eisenhower, Reagan, Clinton

Guess which one was not spanked?

Greegor wrote:
LaVonne:
Why would I need to prove the NORM?

Shouldn't the social architects who consider themselves
the heros who lead us out of our barbaric darkness
with their NEW WAY be the ones to PROVE something?

My proof?

Eisenhower, Reagan, Clinton

Guess which one was not spanked?

Two adulterers and someone that sent in US warplanes to bomb a man's
home and kill some of his family.

I know who was and wasn't spanked.

I wouldn't say that any of these men has sterling performances in
public or private life.

It's been reported by those that worked closely with him that Ike was
not that admirable. He had a very bad temper. He was well known to be a
racial bigot, and regretted his appointment to the supreme court that
helped integrate US schools. It is highly likely he had an adulterous
affair with his aide.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...54/ai_89636759

And Reagan cowboyed us into some of the debacle we now face in the
middle east.

As for Clownboy, his whole legacy hasn't been written yet, but if you
live long enough you'll see what "spanking" produced. And I'm not
talking about his affair something I could care less about politically.


Hitler was a national leader too. And straight arrow in his
behaviors...except for one tiny little thing, WWII, and the holocaust.
He got his share of spanking discipline.

You really need to do some historical research.

Or continue to enjoy making a complete fool of yourself. It obviously
agrees with you or you wouldn't seek it so happily.

Kane

So where are the "never-spanked"? Chris Dunga has, at least, offered one.
:-)

Doan

On 28 Feb 2005, Kane wrote:


Greegor wrote:
LaVonne:
Why would I need to prove the NORM?

Shouldn't the social architects who consider themselves
the heros who lead us out of our barbaric darkness
with their NEW WAY be the ones to PROVE something?

My proof?

Eisenhower, Reagan, Clinton

Guess which one was not spanked?

Two adulterers and someone that sent in US warplanes to bomb a man's
home and kill some of his family.

I know who was and wasn't spanked.

I wouldn't say that any of these men has sterling performances in
public or private life.

It's been reported by those that worked closely with him that Ike was
not that admirable. He had a very bad temper. He was well known to be a
racial bigot, and regretted his appointment to the supreme court that
helped integrate US schools. It is highly likely he had an adulterous
affair with his aide.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...54/ai_89636759

And Reagan cowboyed us into some of the debacle we now face in the
middle east.

As for Clownboy, his whole legacy hasn't been written yet, but if you
live long enough you'll see what "spanking" produced. And I'm not
talking about his affair something I could care less about politically.


Hitler was a national leader too. And straight arrow in his
behaviors...except for one tiny little thing, WWII, and the holocaust.
He got his share of spanking discipline.

You really need to do some historical research.

Or continue to enjoy making a complete fool of yourself. It obviously
agrees with you or you wouldn't seek it so happily.

Kane

Which ones were and were not spanked, Kane?