If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
17 weeks and still no appointment
I'm 17 weeks into this pregnancy, and still haven't gone to the doctor
yet. I'm having trouble getting insurance and don't know what to do about it. I make too much for medicaid, but my employer doesn't offer insurance. With all our money going into bills, how can we do this? Any suggestions? Will a OB still take me on as a patient this far into it? Am I gonna have trouble finding one who WILL take me once I get some type of insurance do you think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
apply for a discount at the local hospital.. someone should know who to
point you to. Tori -- Bonnie 3/20/02 Xavier 10/27/04 "Jenny" wrote in message ... I'm 17 weeks into this pregnancy, and still haven't gone to the doctor yet. I'm having trouble getting insurance and don't know what to do about it. I make too much for medicaid, but my employer doesn't offer insurance. With all our money going into bills, how can we do this? Any suggestions? Will a OB still take me on as a patient this far into it? Am I gonna have trouble finding one who WILL take me once I get some type of insurance do you think? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Jenny wrote:
I'm 17 weeks into this pregnancy, and still haven't gone to the doctor yet. I'm having trouble getting insurance and don't know what to do about it. I make too much for medicaid, but my employer doesn't offer insurance. With all our money going into bills, how can we do this? Any suggestions? Will a OB still take me on as a patient this far into it? Am I gonna have trouble finding one who WILL take me once I get some type of insurance do you think? I would start seeing someone ASAP. I would probably also consider midwifery care. A midwife who does home births or freestanding birthing center births will often charge a flat rate (probably somewhere between $2000 and $4000, with most having a sliding scale based on ability to pay) for the entire package (prenatal, birth, postnatal). If you end up having to pay out of pocket, that's *much* cheaper than what you'd be out with a hospital birth, and as safe or safer given a normal pregnancy. If you do happen to find insurance, it may cover out of hospital birth, in which case you'd really be in luck. Some OBs also have flat rates, but these typically don't include the hospital fees, which can be pricey. Most midwives who do out of hospital births would probably be happy to see you for prenatals now at a reasonable rate or would be willing to work out a payment plan. Also, if your employer offers a medical savings account, you could use that to spread payments out over the course of the year (using pre-tax dollars) if that helps. Best wishes, Ericka |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Jenny" wrote in message ... I'm 17 weeks into this pregnancy, and still haven't gone to the doctor yet. I'm having trouble getting insurance and don't know what to do about it. I make too much for medicaid, but my employer doesn't offer insurance. With all our money going into bills, how can we do this? Any suggestions? Will a OB still take me on as a patient this far into it? Am I gonna have trouble finding one who WILL take me once I get some type of insurance do you think? You should be able to find a caregiver if you want one... some will offer payment plans, etc. There are also often low-income clinics which will provide basic prenatal care, etc. and charge either on a sliding scale or not at all. If you show up at the hospital in labor, they'll catch your baby, period, and you can ultimately pay them as little as $10 per month until the cows come home. Personally, I'm planning a homebirth, with midwife backup but probably unassisted. Our costs should be minimal since we're bartering with the midwife. If we weren't, I would probably pay her a few hundred to be on call for me, and a heck of a lot more than that if she attended the birth. It takes a lot more responsibility on my part, but at the same time, I didn't really have a "real" prenatal visit until something close to 22-24 weeks, then another at 32 weeks, and at that, there wasn't much we really *did*. Also, the income limits for medicaid are often higher when pg--170% of poverty line rather than poverty line or not available at all when not pg. Although the usual "expectation" of prenatal care is that you go in once in the first trimester, once a month or so in the second trimester and more often as you get closer to delivery, the fact of the matter is that very little of what is done in prenatal care is "absolutely necessary" in every case. I personally feel that prenatal care is what you do to take care of yourself during pregnancy. Here's how I've approached it: Ultrasounds, believe it or not, are optional. There's no demonstrated health benefit to baby for getting a routine ultrasound--often when they pick up on a problem, they end up delivering baby sooner, and so you get more complications of prematurity in exchange for fast action--and it works out about even. Personally I think the stress of knowing about a problem ahead of time is far more difficult than assuming everything is okay until proven otherwise, but then again, I'm an optimist at heart. We did an ultrasound at 11 weeks because I was bleeding and wanted to know if the pregnancy was still viable (it was) because I'd had a miscarriage earlier in the year, but we kept it short and to the point--discovered baby was indeed alive, that everything looked normal with a cursory scan (5 minutes, tops) and I've not had another one because nothing in the pg has warranted it. At 11 weeks, if we'd discovered that baby was *not* okay, or had found the bleeding was coming from the placenta, there would have been actions we would have taken at that point. There hasn't been any reason since to do an ultrasound. Listening to baby's heart: Before 24 weeks, even if they don't find a heartbeat and something is wrong, there's not a whole lot they can do about it. If your tummy keeps getting bigger and you start to feel baby moving by 22 weeks or so, you've got a safe bet that baby's got a heartbeat. After 24 weeks, the value of the information is limited, and again, if baby kicks you on a regular basis, you've got a good idea that it's still got a heartbeat. The only time baby's heart has been listened to during this pg was when I was very very sick and went in to get treated for lung stuff (which turned out to be whooping cough). And that was more for their benefit than mine--I was too sick to really object at that point. But baby had been kicking merrily so it wasn't really relevant to my feeling of baby being okay. Blood pressu I do keep track of this myself, at home or in the grocery store, because I know that for me, if my bp goes up, there are specific things that I can change to bring it back down. But I didn't even bother checking until I *did* get sick--it went up when I was sick, went down rapidly as I got the acute problems under control, and has stayed down since. Belly growth: A normal visit after 20 weeks will usually involve measuring from the top of the pubic bone to the top of the uterus (the "fundus"), and "on average" the number of *centimeters* equals the number of weeks pg. If the rate increases faster than 1 cm per week after that, they start wondering about twins. If it's slower, they wonder if the baby is growing enough. Personally, if I'm pg with twins, I don't want to know until they come out (I'm not, if the US is to be believed...lol!) and most women who *are* pg with twins get a pretty good idea of it either from rapid growth, bizarre kicking all over, or the priceless "The left side is hiccuping and so is the right, but they're not in sync." If baby is not growing enough, there really is NOT a lot they can do about it except take the baby early, which is of arguable benefit--as then you not only have a small baby, but a premie as well. Plus, size estimates, whether from measuring, palpating (feeling with hands) or ultrasounds, are notoriously inaccurate. I measured "average" but midwife and doc both, with my daughter, said she was 8-9 pounds at 36 weeks. She was 7 pounds 11 1/2 oz at 40 weeks 3 days. My neighbor was recently told at 38 weeks that her baby was "about 4 pounds".... and he was 7 pounds 12 ounces when born 5-6 days later. In any event, I don't measure my belly more than noticing that my pants fit more snugly or my shirts ride higher. Nevertheless, my belly grows. All the blood tests, etc. There are an awful lot of "screening" tests ranging from tests for iron levels, tests for various immunities and diseases, tests to see if the baby might maybe possibly have some dire problem. There are pee tests--it's a common ritual to go to the doc, pee in a cup, then they dip a strip in the cup and see what colors it turns. Interestingly enough, the midwife I work with says she no longer bothers with the pee tests "as a routine" because the problems it picks up are "late" markers and show symptoms in other ways, earlier, in the vast majority of cases. I had her do one pee test on me shortly after I got sick and my bp shot up, just to make sure there wasn't more going on than just being sick causing my bp to rise. But that was 100% normal, and we haven't bothered since. I didn't do the AFP because when it comes up with a red flag, a huge percentage of the time (95% IIRC) there is nothing wrong. I don't need the stress. I've never been anemic in my life, so iron tests aren't a worry for me. I've been tested 6 ways to Sunday for STD's before my current monogamous relationship, so I'm not worried about those. My blood sugar runs ridiculously normal to low, and I had my dad do a home glucometer reading 1 hour after eating on two separate occasions and came up with numbers so absolutely *fine* that he isn't asking me about it anymore (he's diabetic.) In other words, I know my body and although I've had illness this pg, the underlying fundamentals that make a pregnancy healthy or not healthy are solid. Whooping cough and the stomach flu aren't about "fundamental unhealth", they're about having two college students and a middle schooler in my life. So what is my prenatal care? 1. I take care of my underlying health so that chronic problems are in control and I'm fundamentally decently nourished. This means that my asthma is under control, I take vitamins every day, I eat plenty of protein, veggies, fruits, drink lots of water, avoid eating foods that make me feel lousy (i.e. deep fried stuff) and get lots of rest. 2. I pay attention to my body, and if I get sick and need medical help, I get it. Although I've seen the midwife twice for the pregnancy and seen one doctor about the pregnancy, I've been to other doctors for the whooping cough, a chiropractor to get my back adjusted, etc. Every time something "medical" comes up, I get it taken care of and reevaluate what kind of screening might be warranted to make sure it hasn't caused problems for the pregnancy. So when I got sickest with whooping cough and my bp climbed, we did what we needed to do to open up my lungs and fight the disease (antibiotics, bronchodilators) and my bp came back down. If it hadn't, I would have had to look at what other action I could take to help it come down. When I broke a rib, coughing, we knew that suppressing the cough and easing the pain (with codeine) outweighted the risks of the drug, so I took codeine for a few days to reduce the trauma to my rib from coughing and let me sleep. 3. If I'm curious or worried about something, I go find answers about it. I was worried when I was coughing so hard that my membranes might rupture--called the OB's office and they reassured me that while it is possible to break membranes when coughing, it's not particularly likely (I broke a rib, instead!), especially not in my case, where I was well-nourished and had a history where in labor the last time, my waters didn't break until 8 cm. Anyway--I'm now at 34 1/2 weeks and do plan on visiting with the midwife at 36 weeks to see how baby is lying (I can't always tell) and do some positional changes if baby is breech or posterior. Other than that, we'll play it by ear. Birth is hard work, but not something I'm afraid of, and I'll only call the midwife in if I feel like I want her there. If I feel something is wrong that the hospital can help with, I'll go in. The only way I'd do pain meds is for a c-section or other surgical intervention (and no, I'm not macho about pain, I just don't see childbirth pain as in the same class of pain as other kinds of pain. It's finite, temporary, and has a great reward.) Incidentally, even *with* insurance, I estimate that our likely cost on a hospital birth will end up in the range of $5000+. Follow some of the hospital charges threads here--there's a *LOT* of wiggle room in charges. Avoiding some of the standard practices (like postpartum medications for a normal vaginal birth) may give you some room to negotiate the price lower. Some hospitals will do a set fee. With midwives, many will charge on a sliding scale, take payments, etc. Some take Visa. A midwife may come to your house for prenatal visits, stay with you through labor, clean up after the birth, etc. Most midwives carry oxygen, medicines to slow bleeding after the birth, and they have a ton of experience in both keeping birth normal and recognizing early when it's going away from normal. If you do a homebirth with a midwife for money reasons, just realize that it's not a "second best" choice--indeed for many of us, homebirth is the first choice. I've met few people who have had both a homebirth and a hospital birth and preferred the hospital birth. Most who have had both will never voluntarily go back to hospital birth without a darned good medical reason. Safety-wise, homebirth keeps up well with hospital birth--because while there are more treatments in the hospital, they carry risks as well as benefits. Most routine interventions in the hospital are overused, and thus there are problems that happen in the hospital that don't happen at home. In other words, things can go wrong wherever you birth, it's just that which things are more dangerous depend on where you are. Certain things the hospital does better. Certain things the hospital makes worse. Statistically, if you look at planned homebirth with a midwife and planned hospital birth with low-risk women, it comes out about even, risk-wise. If we weren't bartering with the midwife, I would expect to pay between $1800 and $3000 for a midwife's "full" services, prenatals and all. With the "lite" schedule we're doing, the trade I'm giving comes to about $700 for several prenatals and on call for the birth. If things happen such that she ends up spending a huge amount of time with me during and/or after the birth, we'll probably cough up some money on top of the trade. Ultimately though, even if the hospital were the cheapest option, I'd rather pay a midwife and stay home, or just stay home, than go to a hospital to birth. But it all boils down to what *you* need to do to balance the money worries, etc. Once baby is here, things that make it cheaper include: Cloth diapering (if you don't have to pay "by the load" coin op for laundry) with prefolds, pins and nylon covers. Breastfeed. Make your own babyfood. Don't assume you "need" all the gadgets and stuff--I find a couple good slings substitute well for most of the "keep baby occupied" gear. We have a crib but won't use it most likely. A good carseat is important. Everything else we get second hand, including baby clothes. Yard sales are a great resource, as are friends, family, neighbors, church. Ebay, even, though you have to be careful there on price. If you sew, you can make your own baby clothes, diapers, etc. and save a LOT of money in some cases. Every so often I go down the "baby aisle" at the grocery store.... and realize there's not a darned thing there that I really *need*. Babies just don't have to be that complicated or expensive. Now, once they're old enough for music lessons, it's a whole new ball game... g Jenrose dd age 11 1/2 baby twofoot coming March 2005 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Jenny wrote:
I'm 17 weeks into this pregnancy, and still haven't gone to the doctor yet. I'm having trouble getting insurance and don't know what to do about it. I make too much for medicaid, but my employer doesn't offer insurance. With all our money going into bills, how can we do this? Any suggestions? Will a OB still take me on as a patient this far into it? Am I gonna have trouble finding one who WILL take me once I get some type of insurance do you think? I'm not an expert on this, but I was under the impression that in many states at least, folks who ordinariliy wouldn't qualify for public insurance would qualify for maternity care, and the same or a related program would cover the baby for a few years. Anyone know more? Emily DS 5/02 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:44:07 -0800, Emily
scribbled: Jenny wrote: I'm 17 weeks into this pregnancy, and still haven't gone to the doctor yet. I'm having trouble getting insurance and don't know what to do about it. I make too much for medicaid, but my employer doesn't offer insurance. With all our money going into bills, how can we do this? Any suggestions? Will a OB still take me on as a patient this far into it? Am I gonna have trouble finding one who WILL take me once I get some type of insurance do you think? I'm not an expert on this, but I was under the impression that in many states at least, folks who ordinariliy wouldn't qualify for public insurance would qualify for maternity care, and the same or a related program would cover the baby for a few years. Anyone know more? Yes, more people will qualify for medicaid for maternity only benefits, but there is still an income cap to qualify. It's pretty generous, though. Nan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I've never been anemic in my life, so iron tests aren't a worry for me.
Totally agreeing with you on the unnecessary tests and whatnot, but I did want to point out that before this pg, I'd never been anemic either. With my first pregnancy, my iron was excellent both at the first appointment and at the 28-week check. This time, despite the same diet and all as the first time, my iron was fine at the beginning, but low at the 28-week check. Not low enough to risk me out of homebirth if it didn't come up, but low enough that I was considered anemic, and the midwives wanted me taking a supplement for my own comfort. I had noticed that I was tired and sluggish, but I attributed it to a busy time preparing for Thanksgiving and Christmas, plus normal third-trimester and mom-of-a-toddler tiredness. But it was my iron. I started taking a supplement (Vitron C, once or twice a day, per my midwife's recommendation), and it made a huge difference very quickly -- much more energy and everything. As of 36 weeks, my iron is back up to normal, though the midwife says it's fine to keep taking it once a day, which I'm planning to do until after the lochia stops and all. That's not to say a test would have been absolutely necessary, just that had they not tested, I wouldn't have assumed there was any reason to think I could change the sluggishness. -- -Sara Mommy to DD, 2 3/4 And Someone Due 2/05 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nan wrote:
Yes, more people will qualify for medicaid for maternity only benefits, but there is still an income cap to qualify. It's pretty generous, though. Also, some states offer another medical insurance service for those who are over that limit. for example in California, the program is called aim, and there is a monthly lost cost payment to blue cross/blue shield, plus a small apointment co-pay, but substanstially cheaper than regular insurance fees. If the original poster wants to tel us the state they reside in, I'd be willing to google Laurel -- Birthmom to Bj 4-12-96 mommy to Juliet 4-13-02 and someone new due 8-14-05 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"NotMyRealName" wrote in message news I've never been anemic in my life, so iron tests aren't a worry for me. Totally agreeing with you on the unnecessary tests and whatnot, but I did want to point out that before this pg, I'd never been anemic either. With my first pregnancy, my iron was excellent both at the first appointment and at the 28-week check. This time, despite the same diet and all as the first time, my iron was fine at the beginning, but low at the 28-week check Argh. Here's the deal. If you look at iron levels and compare them to outcomes, women with "anemic" levels (i.e. between 8 and 10) have *better* outcomes statistically than women with "normal" levels of 12+. In fact, it would be worriesome if your iron levels DID NOT DROP at 28 weeks--because it would indicate your blood volume had not expanded appropriately. If you don't feel "anemic" (fatigued easily beyond "pregnancy normal", pale, wan, etc...) then mild anemia is not only not a problem, it's a Good Thing. Anemia, btw, does not make it more likely for someone to bleed during a birth--it just may make recovery take a little longer. And for as sick as I've been, I'm *still* not feeling anemic. Jenrose |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Jenrose" wrote in message news:1106662117.ab5bd7b91b1df68231a9f0e821f85b72@t eranews... "NotMyRealName" wrote in message news I've never been anemic in my life, so iron tests aren't a worry for me. Totally agreeing with you on the unnecessary tests and whatnot, but I did want to point out that before this pg, I'd never been anemic either. With my first pregnancy, my iron was excellent both at the first appointment and at the 28-week check. This time, despite the same diet and all as the first time, my iron was fine at the beginning, but low at the 28-week check Argh. Here's the deal. If you look at iron levels and compare them to outcomes, women with "anemic" levels (i.e. between 8 and 10) have *better* outcomes statistically than women with "normal" levels of 12+. In fact, it would be worriesome if your iron levels DID NOT DROP at 28 weeks--because it would indicate your blood volume had not expanded appropriately. If you don't feel "anemic" (fatigued easily beyond "pregnancy normal", pale, wan, etc...) then mild anemia is not only not a problem, it's a Good Thing. Anemia, btw, does not make it more likely for someone to bleed during a birth--it just may make recovery take a little longer. And for as sick as I've been, I'm *still* not feeling anemic. For #1 I wasn't anaemic at 17 weeks. At 36 weeks my score was 6.8. As it was my first I didn't realise that the tiredness I felt wasn't pregancy normal. My main drop in iron seems to be after about week 30, but I'm only going by how I felt. Debbie |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|