Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling

"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the
U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.

The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children.

What do you mean by "do right"?

A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children
has no morals.

False conclusion based upon a false premise.


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com