Why Did "Aids Baby" Eliza Jane Really Die?

JanD wrote:
"Robert" wrote in message
...

"JanD" wrote in message
news:VY9lf.605554$_o.9254@attbi_s71...


Just ask him what he has a license in and tell him to stop clowning around
pretending he is an expert in something he knows very little about.


Now Robert is side tracked on licensed.

While Probert is forensiced

And, I am correct. You have not shown that I am wrong.

Instead of your silly dismissal game, address the points I raised.


And Harris is doofused

LOL, what a gang!

JanD wrote:

"Robert" wrote in message
...

"JanD" wrote in message
news:VY9lf.605554$_o.9254@attbi_s71...


Just ask him what he has a license in and tell him to stop clowning around
pretending he is an expert in something he knows very little about.

Now Robert is side tracked on licensed.

While Probert is forensiced

And Harris is doofused

LOL, what a gang!

Lordy. Say Jan, just post al-Bayati's relevant qualifications. I don't
mean all of his qualifications, just those relevant to the report he
made. He doesn't seem to have any, and you appear not to know what an
MB is, but you could have some fun actually reading what you post for a
change, just by trying it. LOL.

Cathy

medical politics is another subject--she died from antibiotics not HIV

"JanD" wrote in message
news:J98lf.599543$x96.507374@attbi_s72...



Perhaps Peter can investigate each fool who wrote these, find some dirt in
their past, maybe they didn't dot an i or cross a t, Peter is an expert
(or
so he thinks is making fools) of all who think outside of *organized
medicine* which has been defined repeatedly.


Jan


Hmmm. I don't remember seeing the definition of "*organized medicine*"
before. Would you please be so kind as to repost it for those of us who have
missed the previous postings of the definition.

Thank you very much.
--


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/

Clearly this is medicine that is organized. You're welcome in advance.

"Captain Janeway" wrote in message
oups.com...
Clearly this is medicine that is organized. You're welcome in advance.


So, if I arrange the pillbottles in my bathroom cabinet into neat rows and
alphabetically, then THAT is organized medicine?

;o) Rich

I prefer mine to be in rainbow color order. But whatever organization
you like is just fabulous dear.

"JanD" wrote in message
news:a4hlf.606895$_o.441696@attbi_s71...

"Robert" wrote in message
...

"JanD" wrote in message
news:0P3lf.382276$084.232715@attbi_s22...

"Robert" wrote in message
...

"JanD" wrote in message
news:f8Skf.597397$x96.306475@attbi_s72...
You snipped his background, Robert.

Your *organized medicine* brain washing is showing.

Robert,

In ALL of this projects the United Stated considered him to be both a
toxicologist AND a PATHOLOGIST!

You don't need to have a license for "projects". What is his license to
practice as a professional in his state, he needs a license.
You don't need a license in academic research because you are not
responsible to anybodies health.
Understand this. He is not a licensed pathologist under any definition
of
licensure by any given state.

Read this S L O W L Y.

H e w a s b o t h a t o x i c o l o g o i s t

A
N
D

A

P
A
T
H
O
L
O
G
I
S
T


He can call himself anything he wants but he doesn't have a license for it.
Massage therapists are licensed in performing massage. A toxicologist is not
a pathologist and a massage therapist is not an orthopedic specialist or a
physical therapists.
A pathologist is a medical doctor specializing in pathology.
You must be licensed pathologist first before you can become a licensed
forensic pathologist. Getting a degree in dogs and cats doesn't do the
trick.

"Mark Probert" wrote in

OK. and read this really slowly:

H-e i-s N-O-T a F-O-R-E-N-S-I-C P-A-T-H-O-LO-G-I-S-T which is the
specialty that is trained specifically to render opinions on manner,
mechanism and cause of death.

al-Bayati never treated a human patient, and there is NO evidence that
he ever even attended an autopsy.

The important part of that is there is no true independence on evaluating
the autopsy. He can not read the microscopic slides and render his opinion
independent of the pathologist who read them. What if the pathologist who
read them misinterpreted the actual findings? He doesn't have the slightest
idea of what he is looking at to do it himself.
It's a joke to think that he can.

"john" wrote in message
ups.com...
medical politics is another subject--she died from antibiotics not HIV


You mean the antibiotics used because she was HIV positive causing her
pneumonia?
Or was it her pneumonia caused by HIV directly?

People rarely die from HIV directly. They die from complications of HIV,
infections, cancer etc because the body can't defend itself.

Why was she taken to the hospital in the first place?
Every one of you guys that are HIV positive will go to the hospital and then
blame it on the hospital or treatment. Your excuses are not catching on.