Man walks into office and kills ex-girlfriend over child support

"Avenger" wrote in message
news:SXBmi.4020$fj5.590@trnddc08...
teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"John Larkin" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:46:06 GMT, "Avenger"
wrote:

What probably happened in this case is that he didn't have any money 20
years ago which is why the bitch didn't go after him before, and may
have
only made or come into some recently. The sneaky bitch found out about
it
and in her greed tried to get her hands on it. But why would she need it
now? The kid is grown, so obviously they survived and had the money to
survive. Besides, what's a 40 yo bitch doing having a kid anyway and
ruining
the best years of a man's life when he should be enjoying his youth.Well
one
good thing about this is at least he won't have to pay the money and
will
have plenty to spend in prison )

He wouldn't pay 200 a month to help support his own child?

Was there a DNA test? Was none 20 years ago so this Ho may be lying. In
80%
of these cases the man isn't even the father.


Maybe he didn't have it at the time. Who knows? The best I've been able
to find out is that they were never married, and that the woman refused
to let him have a relationship with the child. I haven't been able to
find out when the order was issued, whether or not it was ongoing support
from the birth of the child, or support assigned when the child was 15,
and ordered back to the birth of the child, leaving him at the starting
gate with a staggering arrearage. The most I've found is that the child
was born sometime in the 80s, maybe. I would certainly like to know way
more about this story. As the wife of a man-who-
found-out-he-had-a-child-just-before-said-child-turned-13, I can tell you
that the blow to ones financial well-being is substantial. And my
husband, due to current laws, only had to pay 2 years of instant
arrearages. It used to be that arrearages were assigned back to the
birth of the child, including pregnancy and birth expenses--well padded,
of course.

Why would a man have to pay birth expenses lol

Ya got me, but that is tacked nicely onto child support orders! When the
first "you owe child support" order came in, the arrearages were staggering,
and included pregnancy and birth expenses. He requested a paternity test,
got the blood drawn, and she refused to bring the child in for the test.
After more than a year of trying to force her to do so, the judge finally
dismissed the case. Several years later, the next demand for child support
came in (same mom, same kid, different state), he again requested proof of
paternity and took the blood test. This time mom took the kid in for the
test, and he was the father. (The child was almost 13 by this time) But the
law, by this point in time, only permitted arrearages to be assessestwo
years back from proof of paternity.

"Aratzio" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:33:19 GMT, in the land of soc.men, "Avenger"
got double secret probation for writing:


"Gini" wrote in message
news:R3vmi.3731$Gx5.1372@trndny02...

"John Larkin" wrote
wrote:

Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah
in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked
next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to
him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And
this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently.

So he'll spend the rest of his life with another guy in a tiny
bunk-bed prison cell, instead of being out and economizing, or even
running away to Brazil and starting over there. That doesn't sound
like a sensible reaction to me.
==
These things don't happen when the person is being "sensible."
They happen when the person has lost the ability to think sensibly.

Then he's not guilty by reason of insanity )

No, but you would be. Learn what is the difference between insanity
and nonsensical, dipweed.

Hey Ratface, has your baby talking AUK group thrown you out? Ha Ha Ha Ha

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:02:57 GMT, "Gini" wrote:


"John Larkin" wrote
wrote:

Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah
in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked
next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to
him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And
this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently.

So he'll spend the rest of his life with another guy in a tiny
bunk-bed prison cell, instead of being out and economizing, or even
running away to Brazil and starting over there. That doesn't sound
like a sensible reaction to me.
==
These things don't happen when the person is being "sensible."
They happen when the person has lost the ability to think sensibly.


And consider the damage that he's done to his own kid.

John

"Avenger" wrote in message
news:SXBmi.4020$fj5.590@trnddc08...
teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"John Larkin" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:46:06 GMT, "Avenger"
wrote:

What probably happened in this case is that he didn't have any money 20
years ago which is why the bitch didn't go after him before, and may
have
only made or come into some recently. The sneaky bitch found out about
it
and in her greed tried to get her hands on it. But why would she need
it
now? The kid is grown, so obviously they survived and had the money to
survive. Besides, what's a 40 yo bitch doing having a kid anyway and
ruining
the best years of a man's life when he should be enjoying his
youth.Well
one
good thing about this is at least he won't have to pay the money and
will
have plenty to spend in prison )

He wouldn't pay 200 a month to help support his own child?

Was there a DNA test? Was none 20 years ago so this Ho may be lying. In
80%
of these cases the man isn't even the father.


Maybe he didn't have it at the time. Who knows? The best I've been
able
to find out is that they were never married, and that the woman refused
to
let him have a relationship with the child. I haven't been able to find
out when the order was issued, whether or not it was ongoing support
from
the birth of the child, or support assigned when the child was 15, and
ordered back to the birth of the child, leaving him at the starting gate
with a staggering arrearage. The most I've found is that the child was
born sometime in the 80s, maybe. I would certainly like to know way
more
about this story. As the wife of a man-who-
found-out-he-had-a-child-just-before-said-child-turned-13, I can tell
you
that the blow to ones financial well-being is substantial. And my
husband, due to current laws, only had to pay 2 years of instant
arrearages. It used to be that arrearages were assigned back to the
birth
of the child, including pregnancy and birth expenses--well padded, of
course.

Why would a man have to pay birth expenses lol

It's just another fancy label for the free cash extorted by the government
people.

"John Larkin" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:19:35 -0700, "
wrote:

Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah
in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked
next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to
him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And
this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently.

So he'll spend the rest of his life with another guy in a tiny
bunk-bed prison cell, instead of being out and economizing, or even
running away to Brazil and starting over there. That doesn't sound
like a sensible reaction to me.

It does to someone who believes in erasing wicked people.


John

"John Larkin" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:46:06 GMT, "Avenger"
wrote:

What probably happened in this case is that he didn't have any money 20
years ago which is why the bitch didn't go after him before, and may have
only made or come into some recently. The sneaky bitch found out about it
and in her greed tried to get her hands on it. But why would she need it
now? The kid is grown, so obviously they survived and had the money to
survive. Besides, what's a 40 yo bitch doing having a kid anyway and
ruining
the best years of a man's life when he should be enjoying his youth.Well
one
good thing about this is at least he won't have to pay the money and will
have plenty to spend in prison )

He wouldn't pay 200 a month to help support his own child?

The above question authored by yet another individual deceived by the
government people.


John

"John Larkin" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:02:57 GMT, "Gini" wrote:


"John Larkin" wrote
wrote:

Yeah. You read that right. He drove all the way from Arizona to Ukiah
in California and shot the succubus in the head. And then he walked
next door to the courthouse and surrendered. You gotta hand it to
him. There's only so much abuse a man can take before reacting. And
this is the kind of man that pushes back, violently.

So he'll spend the rest of his life with another guy in a tiny
bunk-bed prison cell, instead of being out and economizing, or even
running away to Brazil and starting over there. That doesn't sound
like a sensible reaction to me.
==
These things don't happen when the person is being "sensible."
They happen when the person has lost the ability to think sensibly.


And consider the damage that he's done to his own kid.

Which PALES in comparison to the damage the mother inflicted on her own kid.
But we don't talk about that, you see. The good news is that this wicked
woman will NEVER harm another man............. or child.


John

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:12:50 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"John Larkin" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:46:06 GMT, "Avenger"
wrote:

What probably happened in this case is that he didn't have any money 20
years ago which is why the bitch didn't go after him before, and may have
only made or come into some recently. The sneaky bitch found out about it
and in her greed tried to get her hands on it. But why would she need it
now? The kid is grown, so obviously they survived and had the money to
survive. Besides, what's a 40 yo bitch doing having a kid anyway and
ruining
the best years of a man's life when he should be enjoying his youth.Well
one
good thing about this is at least he won't have to pay the money and will
have plenty to spend in prison )

He wouldn't pay 200 a month to help support his own child?

The above question authored by yet another individual deceived by the
government people.

You don't think that men have any responsibility to support their
children?

I think that not only do men have such a responsibility, most actually
want to.

John

"John Larkin" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:12:50 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"John Larkin" wrote in
message
. ..
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:46:06 GMT, "Avenger"
wrote:

What probably happened in this case is that he didn't have any money 20
years ago which is why the bitch didn't go after him before, and may
have
only made or come into some recently. The sneaky bitch found out about
it
and in her greed tried to get her hands on it. But why would she need
it
now? The kid is grown, so obviously they survived and had the money to
survive. Besides, what's a 40 yo bitch doing having a kid anyway and
ruining
the best years of a man's life when he should be enjoying his
youth.Well
one
good thing about this is at least he won't have to pay the money and
will
have plenty to spend in prison )

He wouldn't pay 200 a month to help support his own child?

The above question authored by yet another individual deceived by the
government people.

You don't think that men have any responsibility to support their
children?

I think that not only do men have such a responsibility, most actually
want to.

Most probably also want a relationship with their children, and today's
system does not seem to see that as being as important to the child as $$$$$
is. Try to imagine being a man who does not find out he has a child until
that child is a teenager. Then try dealing with years of arrearages, which
totally trashes your finances, and any hopes of ever retiring. How would
you feel if that child lived too far away to develop a face to face
relationship, and you're called a deadbeat dad, threatened with jail, have
your credit trashed, even though you NEVER miss a single payment from the
time the order is set. Picture having your bank account raided to help pay
the arrearages that you never knew you owed because the mother never let you
know you were a father--and there is no money left that month to support
your family--the children you brought into this world and have loved
unconditionally before you even knew the other child existed. Seriously,
John, think about it. How would you feel in a situation like that. (And
please don't go all preachy on me and tell me how you would *never* behave
in such a way as to create such a problem)

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:38:32 -0700, "teachrmama"
wrote:


John, think about it. How would you feel in a situation like that. (And
please don't go all preachy on me and tell me how you would *never* behave
in such a way as to create such a problem)


I have no idea. I wouldn't get into a situation like that.

John