If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Constitutional question about CPS Service Plans and LIBERTYINTEREST
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...3597e2f0a9de4c
RVD Just how many people have tried these RVD ideas and found them to be less than RVD fruitful there gregg? G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. DS And I do know what it means. I see you're anxious to explain it. G Did you miss the list of the parties in support, G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION? DS Like so what? DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either. It was a non sequitor question. Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court with these arguments, what is your point? That great wrongs DO take place in our system due to the steam roller effect and momentum? Or is your argument that since it was done that way, it must be constitutional? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Constitutional question about CPS Service Plans and LIBERTYINTEREST
On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/... RVD Just how many people have tried these RVD ideas and found them to be less than RVD fruitful there gregg? G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. DS And I do know what it means. I see you're anxious to explain it. You asked if I knew what it meant. I do. And I said so. If you want to post an explanation, go ahead. G Did you miss the list of the parties in support, G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION? DS Like so what? DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either. It was a non sequitor question. Oh, really? In what way? Or did you mean rhetorical? Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court with these arguments, what is your point? This is YOUR thread, dipstick. What's YOUR point? That great wrongs DO take place in our system due to the steam roller effect and momentum? Is that your point? Or is your argument that since it was done that way, it must be constitutional? You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did. Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Constitutional question about CPS Service Plans and LIBERTYINTEREST
On Apr 20, 6:09*pm, Dan Sullivan wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/... RVD Just how many people have tried these RVD ideas and found them to be less than RVD fruitful there gregg? G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. DS And I do know what it means. I see you're anxious to explain it. You asked if I knew what it meant. I do. And I said so. If you want to post an explanation, go ahead. G Did you miss the list of the parties in support, G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION? DS Like so what? DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either. It was a non sequitor question. Oh, really? In what way? Or did you mean rhetorical? Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court with these arguments, what is your point? This is YOUR thread, dipstick. What's YOUR point? That great wrongs DO take place in our system due to the steam roller effect and momentum? Is that your point? Or is your argument that since it was done that way, it must be constitutional? You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did. Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg? This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Constitutional question about CPS Service Plans and LIBERTYINTEREST
On Apr 21, 2:44 am, Greegor wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:09 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote: On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/... RVD Just how many people have tried these RVD ideas and found them to be less than RVD fruitful there gregg? G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. DS And I do know what it means. I see you're anxious to explain it. You asked if I knew what it meant. I do. And I said so. If you want to post an explanation, go ahead. G Did you miss the list of the parties in support, G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION? DS Like so what? DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either. It was a non sequitor question. Oh, really? In what way? Or did you mean rhetorical? Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court with these arguments, what is your point? This is YOUR thread, dipstick. What's YOUR point? That great wrongs DO take place in our system due to the steam roller effect and momentum? Is that your point? Or is your argument that since it was done that way, it must be constitutional? You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did. Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg? This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan? You asked me a single question and I answered it in the affirmative, greg. You, OTOH, failed to answer Ron's question. It's YOU who don't want to say anything of substance, dipstick. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
piggy said you were trying to catch me in something, greg. Give up,did you?
On Apr 21, 2:44 am, Greegor wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:09 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote: On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/... RVD Just how many people have tried these RVD ideas and found them to be less than RVD fruitful there gregg? G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. DS And I do know what it means. I see you're anxious to explain it. You asked if I knew what it meant. I do. And I said so. If you want to post an explanation, go ahead. G Did you miss the list of the parties in support, G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION? DS Like so what? DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either. It was a non sequitor question. Oh, really? In what way? Or did you mean rhetorical? Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court with these arguments, what is your point? This is YOUR thread, dipstick. What's YOUR point? That great wrongs DO take place in our system due to the steam roller effect and momentum? Is that your point? Or is your argument that since it was done that way, it must be constitutional? You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did. Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg? This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
piggy said you were trying to catch me in something, greg. Giveup, did you?
On Apr 22, 7:31*am, Dan Sullivan wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:44 am, Greegor wrote: On Apr 20, 6:09 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote: On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/.... RVD Just how many people have tried these RVD ideas and found them to be less than RVD fruitful there gregg? G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. DS And I do know what it means. I see you're anxious to explain it. You asked if I knew what it meant. I do. And I said so. If you want to post an explanation, go ahead. G Did you miss the list of the parties in support, G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION? DS Like so what? DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either. It was a non sequitor question. Oh, really? In what way? Or did you mean rhetorical? Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court with these arguments, what is your point? This is YOUR thread, dipstick. What's YOUR point? That great wrongs DO take place in our system due to the steam roller effect and momentum? Is that your point? Or is your argument that since it was done that way, it must be constitutional? You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did. Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg? G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan? DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch me in something, greg. Give up, did you? What would I catch you at, Dan? g |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
piggy said you were trying to catch me in something, greg. Giveup, did you?
On Apr 22, 2:29 pm, Greegor wrote:
On Apr 22, 7:31 am, Dan Sullivan wrote: On Apr 21, 2:44 am, Greegor wrote: On Apr 20, 6:09 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote: On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/... RVD Just how many people have tried these RVD ideas and found them to be less than RVD fruitful there gregg? G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan? DS That's not an answer to Ron's question. DS And I do know what it means. I see you're anxious to explain it. You asked if I knew what it meant. I do. And I said so. If you want to post an explanation, go ahead. G Did you miss the list of the parties in support, G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION? DS Like so what? DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either. It was a non sequitor question. Oh, really? In what way? Or did you mean rhetorical? Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court with these arguments, what is your point? This is YOUR thread, dipstick. What's YOUR point? That great wrongs DO take place in our system due to the steam roller effect and momentum? Is that your point? Or is your argument that since it was done that way, it must be constitutional? You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did. Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg? G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan? DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch me in something, greg. Give up, did you? What would I catch you at, Dan? g I don't have any idea what's in your feeble mind, greg. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
piggy said you were trying to catch me in something, greg. Giveup, did you?
G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan? DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch DS * * * * me in something, greg. Give up, did you? G What would I catch you at, Dan? * g G I don't have any idea what's in your feeble mind, greg. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsyNNKb4wLg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GS1Dj-EnGI |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
piggy said you were trying to catch me in something, greg. Giveup, did you?
On Apr 22, 5:38 pm, Greegor wrote:
G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan? DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch DS me in something, greg. Give up, did you? G What would I catch you at, Dan? g G I don't have any idea what's in your feeble mind, greg. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsyNN...?v=6GS1Dj-EnGI Of course you live your pathetic life vicariously on youtube! Where else? Not in the real world. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
piggy said you were trying to catch me in something, greg. Giveup, did you?
G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan? DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch DS * * * * me in something, greg. Give up, did you? G What would I catch you at, Dan? * g DS I don't have any idea what's in your feeble mind, greg. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsyNNKb4wLg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GS1Dj-EnGI DS Of course you live your pathetic life vicariously on youtube! DS Where else? DS Not in the real world. Dan Sullivan posting history http://groups.google.com/groups/prof...vA1U01ExQS2_8A |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Constitutional question about CPS Service Plans and LIBERTY INTEREST | Ron | Spanking | 14 | April 23rd 08 01:45 PM |
Privacy Service Or Pedo Service? | R. Steve Walz | Solutions | 0 | July 19th 07 10:08 AM |
Locate a school, day care service, after-school program, camp, or other service free at childcareboard.org | childcareboard.org | Twins & Triplets | 0 | July 4th 07 05:14 AM |
Locate a school, day care service, after-school program, camp, or other service free at childcareboard.org | childcareboard.org | Spanking | 0 | July 4th 07 05:14 AM |
Locate a school, day care service, after-school program, camp, or other service free at childcareboard.org | childcareboard.org | Solutions | 0 | July 4th 07 05:14 AM |