What do think????

P.Fritz wrote:
Unless it's approved by a court/judge, it doesn't exist.

Even then, it can always be modified by one party filing a motion.

It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
P.Fritz wrote:
Unless it's approved by a court/judge, it doesn't exist.

Even then, it can always be modified by one party filing a motion.

It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

Of course they can raise it retroactrively, just never decrease it :-)


--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
P.Fritz wrote:
Unless it's approved by a court/judge, it doesn't exist.

Even then, it can always be modified by one party filing a motion.

It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

Of course they can raise it retroactrively, just never decrease it :-)


--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
P.Fritz wrote:
Unless it's approved by a court/judge, it doesn't exist.

Even then, it can always be modified by one party filing a motion.

It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

Of course they can raise it retroactrively, just never decrease it :-)


--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
P.Fritz wrote:
Unless it's approved by a court/judge, it doesn't exist.

Even then, it can always be modified by one party filing a motion.

It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

Of course they can raise it retroactrively, just never decrease it :-)


--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

P.Fritz wrote:
It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

Of course they can raise it retroactrively, just never decrease it
:-)

Ok, now wait. I was under the impression that once an order is done,
it can be modified later, but not increased retroactively. For
example, if an order is established in June 1995 for $200/mo, the CP
can go back and ask for an increase to $350/mo in July 2002, but the
judge cannot order a retroactive increase for additional money prior to
the modification request, prior to July 2002. In general
circumstances, not instances of fraud, or withholding income
information, etc.

--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

P.Fritz wrote:
It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

Of course they can raise it retroactrively, just never decrease it
:-)

Ok, now wait. I was under the impression that once an order is done,
it can be modified later, but not increased retroactively. For
example, if an order is established in June 1995 for $200/mo, the CP
can go back and ask for an increase to $350/mo in July 2002, but the
judge cannot order a retroactive increase for additional money prior to
the modification request, prior to July 2002. In general
circumstances, not instances of fraud, or withholding income
information, etc.

--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

P.Fritz wrote:
It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

Of course they can raise it retroactrively, just never decrease it
:-)

Ok, now wait. I was under the impression that once an order is done,
it can be modified later, but not increased retroactively. For
example, if an order is established in June 1995 for $200/mo, the CP
can go back and ask for an increase to $350/mo in July 2002, but the
judge cannot order a retroactive increase for additional money prior to
the modification request, prior to July 2002. In general
circumstances, not instances of fraud, or withholding income
information, etc.

--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

P.Fritz wrote:
It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

Of course they can raise it retroactrively, just never decrease it
:-)

Ok, now wait. I was under the impression that once an order is done,
it can be modified later, but not increased retroactively. For
example, if an order is established in June 1995 for $200/mo, the CP
can go back and ask for an increase to $350/mo in July 2002, but the
judge cannot order a retroactive increase for additional money prior to
the modification request, prior to July 2002. In general
circumstances, not instances of fraud, or withholding income
information, etc.

--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

In article , The Dave© says...

P.Fritz wrote:
It can be modified, but at least not retroactively. In theory, of
course.

Of course they can raise it retroactrively, just never decrease it
:-)

Ok, now wait. I was under the impression that once an order is done,
it can be modified later, but not increased retroactively. For
example, if an order is established in June 1995 for $200/mo, the CP
can go back and ask for an increase to $350/mo in July 2002, but the
judge cannot order a retroactive increase for additional money prior to
the modification request, prior to July 2002. In general
circumstances, not instances of fraud, or withholding income
information, etc.
=====
Generally true--However, the key is that the "first" order is by judge's
decree--not an agreement between parents, even if notorized.
=====
=====

--
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
~Author Unknown

(PLEASE NOTE: I never bottom-sign my posts.
Check Headers to Verify the Authenticity of This Post)