How many had prior knowledge of the "system"?

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Beverly wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:


Lecher9000 wrote:

My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing
horrible
would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for
everything for
13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never
loved
me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.

So you don't believe that there are pedophiles? If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of police,
and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not be
permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

teachrmama wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

Beverly wrote:

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:



Lecher9000 wrote:


My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing

horrible

would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for

everything for

13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never

loved

me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


So you don't believe that there are pedophiles?

Is there some problem with your reading? IS that how you teach in school?


If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of police,
and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not be
permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

By the time she gets done telling it, Adam will be the scum wife beater
pedophile, and Eve would have escaped to save the child.

By the time she gets done telling it, Joseph will be the scum wife
beater pedophile, and Mary would have escaped to save the child.

Whether or not there are actual pedophiles and wife beaters can not be
determined by listening to wives who would destroy their families.

Bob


--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

teachrmama wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

Beverly wrote:

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:



Lecher9000 wrote:


My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing

horrible

would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for

everything for

13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never

loved

me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


So you don't believe that there are pedophiles?

Is there some problem with your reading? IS that how you teach in school?


If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of police,
and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not be
permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

By the time she gets done telling it, Adam will be the scum wife beater
pedophile, and Eve would have escaped to save the child.

By the time she gets done telling it, Joseph will be the scum wife
beater pedophile, and Mary would have escaped to save the child.

Whether or not there are actual pedophiles and wife beaters can not be
determined by listening to wives who would destroy their families.

Bob


--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

teachrmama wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

Beverly wrote:

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:



Lecher9000 wrote:


My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing

horrible

would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for

everything for

13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never

loved

me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


So you don't believe that there are pedophiles?

Is there some problem with your reading? IS that how you teach in school?


If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of police,
and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not be
permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

By the time she gets done telling it, Adam will be the scum wife beater
pedophile, and Eve would have escaped to save the child.

By the time she gets done telling it, Joseph will be the scum wife
beater pedophile, and Mary would have escaped to save the child.

Whether or not there are actual pedophiles and wife beaters can not be
determined by listening to wives who would destroy their families.

Bob


--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

"Bob" wrote in message
...
teachrmama wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

Beverly wrote:

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:



Lecher9000 wrote:


My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing

horrible

would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for

everything for

13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never

loved

me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it
you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


So you don't believe that there are pedophiles?

Is there some problem with your reading? IS that how you teach in school?


If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of
police,
and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not
be
permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

By the time she gets done telling it, Adam will be the scum wife beater
pedophile, and Eve would have escaped to save the child.

By the time she gets done telling it, Joseph will be the scum wife
beater pedophile, and Mary would have escaped to save the child.

Whether or not there are actual pedophiles and wife beaters can not be
determined by listening to wives who would destroy their families.

Who, then, would you listen to if not the witness? If the woman goes to the
hospital with broken bones, and the child has bruises up and down his body,
how can you say "Don't listen to the woman who wants to break up the
family"? I'm trying to understand what you are saying, Bob. I do not think
marriages whould be ended on a whim, or "to find myself" or any other
nonsense. I am not in favor of breaking up families. But sometimes there
*are* serious problems that have to be addressed from a point of safety.
And your answer to that *seems* to be that the woman does not have the right
to break up the family, because she is probably lying just to get out of the
marriage. So, instead of making the same statement again, please tell me
how it should be determined that an abuser is abusive enough for a woman to
be justified in leaving. Or how it can be determined that a man is a
pdeophile if you are not willing to listen to the wife or the kids.

"Bob" wrote in message
...
teachrmama wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

Beverly wrote:

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:



Lecher9000 wrote:


My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing

horrible

would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for

everything for

13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never

loved

me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it
you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


So you don't believe that there are pedophiles?

Is there some problem with your reading? IS that how you teach in school?


If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of
police,
and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not
be
permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

By the time she gets done telling it, Adam will be the scum wife beater
pedophile, and Eve would have escaped to save the child.

By the time she gets done telling it, Joseph will be the scum wife
beater pedophile, and Mary would have escaped to save the child.

Whether or not there are actual pedophiles and wife beaters can not be
determined by listening to wives who would destroy their families.

Who, then, would you listen to if not the witness? If the woman goes to the
hospital with broken bones, and the child has bruises up and down his body,
how can you say "Don't listen to the woman who wants to break up the
family"? I'm trying to understand what you are saying, Bob. I do not think
marriages whould be ended on a whim, or "to find myself" or any other
nonsense. I am not in favor of breaking up families. But sometimes there
*are* serious problems that have to be addressed from a point of safety.
And your answer to that *seems* to be that the woman does not have the right
to break up the family, because she is probably lying just to get out of the
marriage. So, instead of making the same statement again, please tell me
how it should be determined that an abuser is abusive enough for a woman to
be justified in leaving. Or how it can be determined that a man is a
pdeophile if you are not willing to listen to the wife or the kids.

"Bob" wrote in message
...
teachrmama wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

Beverly wrote:

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:



Lecher9000 wrote:


My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing

horrible

would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for

everything for

13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never

loved

me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it
you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


So you don't believe that there are pedophiles?

Is there some problem with your reading? IS that how you teach in school?


If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of
police,
and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not
be
permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

By the time she gets done telling it, Adam will be the scum wife beater
pedophile, and Eve would have escaped to save the child.

By the time she gets done telling it, Joseph will be the scum wife
beater pedophile, and Mary would have escaped to save the child.

Whether or not there are actual pedophiles and wife beaters can not be
determined by listening to wives who would destroy their families.

Who, then, would you listen to if not the witness? If the woman goes to the
hospital with broken bones, and the child has bruises up and down his body,
how can you say "Don't listen to the woman who wants to break up the
family"? I'm trying to understand what you are saying, Bob. I do not think
marriages whould be ended on a whim, or "to find myself" or any other
nonsense. I am not in favor of breaking up families. But sometimes there
*are* serious problems that have to be addressed from a point of safety.
And your answer to that *seems* to be that the woman does not have the right
to break up the family, because she is probably lying just to get out of the
marriage. So, instead of making the same statement again, please tell me
how it should be determined that an abuser is abusive enough for a woman to
be justified in leaving. Or how it can be determined that a man is a
pdeophile if you are not willing to listen to the wife or the kids.

teachrmama wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

teachrmama wrote:

"Bob" wrote in message
...


Beverly wrote:


On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:




Lecher9000 wrote:



My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing

horrible


would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for

everything for


13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never

loved


me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it

you're

the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


So you don't believe that there are pedophiles?

Is there some problem with your reading? IS that how you teach in school?



If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of

police,

and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not

be

permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

By the time she gets done telling it, Adam will be the scum wife beater
pedophile, and Eve would have escaped to save the child.

By the time she gets done telling it, Joseph will be the scum wife
beater pedophile, and Mary would have escaped to save the child.

Whether or not there are actual pedophiles and wife beaters can not be
determined by listening to wives who would destroy their families.


Who, then, would you listen to if not the witness? If the woman goes to the
hospital with broken bones, and the child has bruises up and down his body,
how can you say "Don't listen to the woman who wants to break up the
family"? I'm trying to understand what you are saying, Bob. I do not think
marriages whould be ended on a whim, or "to find myself" or any other
nonsense.

Most do actually. In data that has been posted several times over the
past year those are the most common reasons.

I am not in favor of breaking up families. But sometimes there
*are* serious problems that have to be addressed from a point of safety.

Usually not. Children are usually, statistically, safer staying with
their fathers.

And your answer to that *seems* to be that the woman does not have the right
to break up the family, because she is probably lying just to get out of the
marriage. So, instead of making the same statement again, please tell me
how it should be determined that an abuser is abusive enough for a woman to
be justified in leaving. Or how it can be determined that a man is a
pdeophile if you are not willing to listen to the wife or the kids.



One day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf! wolf!"
The people of the town all ran out to save his sheep, but there was no
wolf.

The next day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf!
wolf!" The people of the town all ran out to save his sheep, but there
was no wolf.

The next day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf!
wolf!" The people of the town all ran out to save his sheep, but there
was no wolf.

The next day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf!
wolf!" The people of the town sat home and hoisted another glass of beer
because by then nobody gave a **** whether there was a wolf or not.

Females who cry "wife beating pedophile" are like the shepherd. They've
been crying the same lying crap so many times nobody gives a **** any
more whether it's true this time or not.

Bob


--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

teachrmama wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

teachrmama wrote:

"Bob" wrote in message
...


Beverly wrote:


On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:




Lecher9000 wrote:



My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing

horrible


would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for

everything for


13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never

loved


me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it

you're

the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


So you don't believe that there are pedophiles?

Is there some problem with your reading? IS that how you teach in school?



If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of

police,

and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not

be

permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

By the time she gets done telling it, Adam will be the scum wife beater
pedophile, and Eve would have escaped to save the child.

By the time she gets done telling it, Joseph will be the scum wife
beater pedophile, and Mary would have escaped to save the child.

Whether or not there are actual pedophiles and wife beaters can not be
determined by listening to wives who would destroy their families.


Who, then, would you listen to if not the witness? If the woman goes to the
hospital with broken bones, and the child has bruises up and down his body,
how can you say "Don't listen to the woman who wants to break up the
family"? I'm trying to understand what you are saying, Bob. I do not think
marriages whould be ended on a whim, or "to find myself" or any other
nonsense.

Most do actually. In data that has been posted several times over the
past year those are the most common reasons.

I am not in favor of breaking up families. But sometimes there
*are* serious problems that have to be addressed from a point of safety.

Usually not. Children are usually, statistically, safer staying with
their fathers.

And your answer to that *seems* to be that the woman does not have the right
to break up the family, because she is probably lying just to get out of the
marriage. So, instead of making the same statement again, please tell me
how it should be determined that an abuser is abusive enough for a woman to
be justified in leaving. Or how it can be determined that a man is a
pdeophile if you are not willing to listen to the wife or the kids.



One day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf! wolf!"
The people of the town all ran out to save his sheep, but there was no
wolf.

The next day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf!
wolf!" The people of the town all ran out to save his sheep, but there
was no wolf.

The next day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf!
wolf!" The people of the town all ran out to save his sheep, but there
was no wolf.

The next day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf!
wolf!" The people of the town sat home and hoisted another glass of beer
because by then nobody gave a **** whether there was a wolf or not.

Females who cry "wife beating pedophile" are like the shepherd. They've
been crying the same lying crap so many times nobody gives a **** any
more whether it's true this time or not.

Bob


--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

teachrmama wrote:
"Bob" wrote in message
...

teachrmama wrote:

"Bob" wrote in message
...


Beverly wrote:


On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 19:26:42 -0600, Bob wrote:




Lecher9000 wrote:



My "mistake" was believing that if I "did the right thing", nothing

horrible


would happen to me. I never cheated on my wife, paid her way for

everything for


13 years, then she bailed out on me, with my son, because she " never

loved


me". And she took me for everything she could get.


Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it

you're

the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


And if she can prove the man is a pedophile? For your information,
not all pedophiles are arrested and convicted. It is a psychological
diagnoses based, in part, on the actions of the diagnosed. My ex was
diagnosed long before I ever met him. It was not until one of my
children accused him of things that I ever found out. Had I known
before we were married, he'd have no child support order for our
children because there wouldn't be any. There would have been no
divorce because there would not have been a marriage.



Yep, they do that, and by the time she gets done telling about it you're
the scum wife beater pedophile and she escaped to save your child.


So you don't believe that there are pedophiles?

Is there some problem with your reading? IS that how you teach in school?



If there did happen to be a
pedophile who was caught in the act by the preacher, the chief of

police,

and Mother Teresa herself, would you think that, perhaps, he should not

be

permitted to be alone with children? That, maybe, his wife would be
justified in leaving him in order to protect the children?

By the time she gets done telling it, Adam will be the scum wife beater
pedophile, and Eve would have escaped to save the child.

By the time she gets done telling it, Joseph will be the scum wife
beater pedophile, and Mary would have escaped to save the child.

Whether or not there are actual pedophiles and wife beaters can not be
determined by listening to wives who would destroy their families.


Who, then, would you listen to if not the witness? If the woman goes to the
hospital with broken bones, and the child has bruises up and down his body,
how can you say "Don't listen to the woman who wants to break up the
family"? I'm trying to understand what you are saying, Bob. I do not think
marriages whould be ended on a whim, or "to find myself" or any other
nonsense.

Most do actually. In data that has been posted several times over the
past year those are the most common reasons.

I am not in favor of breaking up families. But sometimes there
*are* serious problems that have to be addressed from a point of safety.

Usually not. Children are usually, statistically, safer staying with
their fathers.

And your answer to that *seems* to be that the woman does not have the right
to break up the family, because she is probably lying just to get out of the
marriage. So, instead of making the same statement again, please tell me
how it should be determined that an abuser is abusive enough for a woman to
be justified in leaving. Or how it can be determined that a man is a
pdeophile if you are not willing to listen to the wife or the kids.



One day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf! wolf!"
The people of the town all ran out to save his sheep, but there was no
wolf.

The next day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf!
wolf!" The people of the town all ran out to save his sheep, but there
was no wolf.

The next day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf!
wolf!" The people of the town all ran out to save his sheep, but there
was no wolf.

The next day the little shepherd ran into town crying "wolf! wolf!
wolf!" The people of the town sat home and hoisted another glass of beer
because by then nobody gave a **** whether there was a wolf or not.

Females who cry "wife beating pedophile" are like the shepherd. They've
been crying the same lying crap so many times nobody gives a **** any
more whether it's true this time or not.

Bob


--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]