Survey: How many voted It Is The Patents Right to Refuse Vaccinations

http://www.naturalnews.com/z022963.html

NaturalNews) A public survey posted on NaturalNews.com reveals that 98% of
survey participants (1919 out of 1954) believe that parents should have the
right to refuse vaccinations for their children. The online survey was
conducted from April 6 to April 8, and survey respondents were
self-selected. A total of 1,954 votes were received at the time of this
writing. The survey asked the question, "What should happen to parents who
refuse to have their children vaccinated?" The results were as follows:

They should be fined: 1% (20 votes)

They should be jailed: 0.2% (4 votes)

They should have their children taken away: 0.6% (11 votes)

Nothing: It's their right to refuse vaccinations: 98.2% (1919 votes)

The survey comes on the heels of the FDA's approval of a vaccine for
diarrhea for children and the growing concern by parents that infants are
being given far too many vaccines that may cause health problems due to the
combination of multiple chemicals being injected. (The survy is republished
at the end of this article, in case you'd like to see the current results or
take the survey yourself.)


Vaccine promotion as a marketing gimmick
Drug companies, meanwhile, are seeking out new "markets" for promoting
vaccines, including lobbying state legislators to pass mandatory vaccination
laws, spreading fear about the Human Papilloma Virus to promote HPV
vaccines, and urging parents to get their babies vaccinated for an
ever-increasing number of health concerns -- including diarrhea.
Intelligent, well-informed parents are increasingly asking, "Do our babies
really need so many injections?"

The vaccination model of medicine is based on medical mythology promoted by
Big Pharma-affiliate health authorities who do not believe the human immune
system is able to adequately protect the body without chemical intervention.
Vaccine believers -- which include most doctors and health officials --
insist that the only way the human immune system can properly recognize a
potentially dangerous invader (such as a virus) is to intervene by injecting
the body with weakened viral elements combined with inflammatory chemicals
designed to activate an artificial immune system response. This inflammatory
response may be partially responsible for the increase in autism and other
diseases following vaccinations. (Some children have died within hours after
receiving vaccine injections.) Author Byron Richards recently authored a
detailed article explaining this: http://www.naturalnews.com/022955.html

This medical mythology goes to great lengths to discount the naturopathic
view of human health, which says that the human immune system should be
supported rather than chemically hijacked, and that when properly supported
through healthy foods, nutrition and an absence of chemical toxins, the
human immune system is a fantastically effective technology that accurately
identifies invading viruses and protects the body with an appropriate immune
system response. Allowing the human immune system to do its job also
subjects it to stresses that allow an adaptive response to unfold -- a
response that strengthens the immune system against future threats,
significantly lowering the risk of infection in the future.

Vaccines, on the other hand, weaken the immune system, denying it the
adaptive response it needs to strengthen its defenses against future
threats. But vaccine promoting health authorities think the only way to
reduce the risk of infection is to administer a never-ending series of
vaccination injections: one for each mutation of a virus that might be
circulating in the wild. At no point does this pro-vaccine medical mythology
believe the human immune system should take over and that vaccines are no
longer needed. Rather, it is based on the idea that infants, children,
adults and seniors must be subjected to hundreds of different vaccine
injections over their lifetime. Each injection, of course, earns revenue for
the drug companies that primarily sponsor the continuation of this outmoded
medical paradigm.


Most vaccines are medically useless
Clinical studies show that vaccines don't work on most people. Even winter
flu shots are little more than a form of medical Russian roulette, since
most vaccines are built to defend against the previous year's viral strains,
not the current year. And that's if they even work at all: The hard science
says that senior citizens who receive vaccine shots have absolutely no
reduction whatsoever in their frequency of catching the flu.

Vaccines, for the most part, are little more than modern medical quackery.
It's Big Pharma's version of snake oil. Most vaccines simply don't work on
most people, and some people are harmed or killed by vaccines. And while
defenders of vaccines (most of whom are on the take from Big Pharma in one
way or another, by the way) may claim that vaccines have eradicated
infectious disease in our world over the last century or so, the simple
truth is that advances in public sanitation are responsible for virtually
all the improvements in infant mortality and the eradication of serious
infectious disease.

Far from the mission of saving lives, Big Pharma is now pushing vaccines for
conditions that pose very little threat to life in the first place. The fact
that vaccines are now being pushed to prevent infant diarrhea is a perfect
example. If infants are suffering from diarrhea, they need proper nutrition
(get off those processed infant formula products!) and immune system
support. They do not need to have their immune systems attacked by yet
another chemical cocktail injected into their bodies at Big Pharma profit
centers (also known as clinics and hospitals).

Vaccination is the great medical hoax of our time. One day it will stand
alongside mercury fillings, public water fluoridation, antibiotics abuse,
the cholesterol "disease" hoax and psychiatric drugs as one of the grandest
medical cons ever perpetrated on the American people. Modern medicine has
become a system driven almost entirely by profit, not by any genuine desire
to save lives. And the promotion of "treatments" is more about sales and
marketing than disease prevention.

Parents would do well to think twice before submitting their children to
vaccines. Remember this: Autism is not reversible. The damage caused by
vaccines is permanent. Protect your healthy baby from brain damage or death.
Inform yourself about the side effects of vaccines, and find the courage to
"just say no" to vaccine quackery.


Inform yourself now
I encourage all parents considering this issue to seek out a qualified
naturopathic health practitioner and find your own answers to this
vaccination question. Some parents may decide to have one or two vaccines
and skip the rest, reducing the total chemical burden on their children.
Some may even decide to subject their children to no vaccines whatsoever.
The choice is yours.

And that's my point, actually. I believe the choice of vaccination should be
up to the parents, not the government. Medical pill-pushers, on the other
hand, strenuously disagree. They believe so strongly in their vaccine
quackery that they insist parents who refuse to subject their children to an
unlimited number of vaccines should be arrested, fined or thrown in prison.
That is the view of mainstream medicine, with all its medical schools,
"scientific" journals and FDA cheerleading. It is a system of medical
imperialism that seeks to overthrow fundamental health freedoms and remove
parents from the chain of decision making that determines the health outcome
of their own children. Vaccine-pushing doctors and drug companies literally
seek to criminalize parents who do not agree with their own distorted
opinions on vaccines, and they truly hope to limit consumer choice,
restricting parents to a single system of chemical-based medicine that has
been arbitrarily designated as the one true system of medical belief by
those who stand to gain the most from its adoption.

Vaccines, in other words, have been chosen not because they are based on
scientific validity, but because they are consistent with the shared
illusions that now serve as the very foundation of modern pharmacological
medicine: That the human body has no ability protect or heal itself, and
that any "real medicine" must come from outside the body, to be forcefully
injected where it can override the body's innate biochemistry and eradicate
some real or imagined threat. For doctors to abandon the mythology of
vaccines, they would have to throw out their entire (mis)understanding of
the human body and start from scratch. And they're not about to venture down
that road unless someone forces them to... because who knows where that road
might lead... like, perhaps, to the most frightening of all concepts to
vaccine-pushing doctors: Homeopathy!

Vaccines are popular in the modern medical community for no reason other
than the fact that they support the arrogant notion that doctors do all the
healing, not patients. That's why the continued mythology of vaccines and
chemical intervention is so dangerous to human health -- because by
definition it excludes the acknowledgement of the only pathway to true
healing: That the patient is the healer and that achieving lasting health
can only be accomplished by supporting the patient's own internal healing
technology... the amazing human immune system!

I guarantee you this: My own immune system knows more about my health than
any doctor. In fact, my own immune system knows more about my health than my
own conscious mind! It is impossible for a human brain to comprehend the
miraculous complexity of the underlying immune system technology that
protects it.


But are vaccines ever useful?
Of course, there are certain limited situations in which vaccines can be
quite useful. If you're about to work in a class IV biohazard laboratory,
where highly aggressive viruses like Ebola or Marburg can kill you in
minutes or hours, then receiving a vaccine injection to protect you from
these various strains makes good sense because the risk of injury is so high
from your professional work that it makes the risk of harm from a vaccine
seem small by comparison. But should the public be vaccinated against these
highly virulent strains? Of course not. Such strains can never become
epidemics for the simple reason that they kill their hosts too quickly.

I'm not kidding when I say that the best way to stop the spread of these
rare, aggressive outbreaks of viral strains from the Conga is for all the
hospital staff to flee into the hills and thereby create distance between
themselves. It is an inarguable, well-documented fact that the primary hubs
for the spread of such aggressive diseases are, in fact, the hospital
workers themselves. Think about it: Where do sick people go first? To the
hospital! And that's where the virus catches hold and starts to spread. The
most dangerous place to go during any epidemic is to the hospital.

But getting back to babies and mild viral infections, should babies be
subjected to the risks of vaccines in order to prevent mild, non-fatal
conditions like diarrhea? Of course not. That makes no scientific sense. It
does, however, make great marketing sense if you're a shareholder for one of
the companies manufacturing the infant diarrhea vaccines.

Funny thing, though: The healthiest children I see are the ones playing in
the dirt, wearing no sunscreen, breatfeeding and receiving no vaccine shots
whatsoever. It's all the kids following the modern "scientific" lifestyle
that are sick. They're the ones eating processed foods, drinking
corporate-sponsored infant formula, smearing on toxic sunscreen chemicals,
chugging artificial sports drinks and getting jabbed with needles all the
time. Those are the kids who have allergies and weakened immune systems.
Coincidence? You be the judge.

I can tell you this, though: If I have children, I would never subject them
to any vaccines. And as they grow up healthy, I'll slap a bumper sticker on
my car that reads, "My Vaccine-Free Kid is Smarter than Your Honor Student!"

You may take the survey now, if you haven't already:

"Jan Drew" wrote:

A public survey posted on NaturalNews.com reveals that 98% of
survey participants (1919 out of 1954) believe that parents should have the
right to refuse vaccinations for their children. The online survey was
conducted from April 6 to April 8, and survey respondents were
self-selected. A total of 1,954 votes were received at the time of this
writing.

The first thing I was taught in my first statistics class - look at
where the sample came from and how it was selected.

I would be very surprised if a self-selected sample of fans of a
quackery site would have given any other result.

snip remainder of stuff which would score "Please rework and
resubmit" in Stats 101 anywhere

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"Jan Drew" wrote in message
...
http://www.naturalnews.com/z022963.html

NaturalNews) A public survey posted on NaturalNews.com reveals that 98% of
survey participants (1919 out of 1954) believe that parents should have
the
right to refuse vaccinations for their children. The online survey was
conducted from April 6 to April 8, and survey respondents were
self-selected. A total of 1,954 votes were received at the time of this
writing. The survey asked the question, "What should happen to parents who
refuse to have their children vaccinated?" The results were as follows:

They should be fined: 1% (20 votes)

They should be jailed: 0.2% (4 votes)

They should have their children taken away: 0.6% (11 votes)

Nothing: It's their right to refuse vaccinations: 98.2% (1919 votes)

The survey comes on the heels of the FDA's approval of a vaccine for
diarrhea for children and the growing concern by parents that infants are
being given far too many vaccines that may cause health problems due to
the
combination of multiple chemicals being injected. (The survy is
republished
at the end of this article, in case you'd like to see the current results
or
take the survey yourself.)


Vaccine promotion as a marketing gimmick
Drug companies, meanwhile, are seeking out new "markets" for promoting
vaccines, including lobbying state legislators to pass mandatory
vaccination
laws, spreading fear about the Human Papilloma Virus to promote HPV
vaccines, and urging parents to get their babies vaccinated for an
ever-increasing number of health concerns -- including diarrhea.
Intelligent, well-informed parents are increasingly asking, "Do our babies
really need so many injections?"

The vaccination model of medicine is based on medical mythology promoted
by
Big Pharma-affiliate health authorities who do not believe the human
immune
system is able to adequately protect the body without chemical
intervention.
Vaccine believers -- which include most doctors and health officials --
insist that the only way the human immune system can properly recognize a
potentially dangerous invader (such as a virus) is to intervene by
injecting
the body with weakened viral elements combined with inflammatory chemicals
designed to activate an artificial immune system response. This
inflammatory
response may be partially responsible for the increase in autism and other
diseases following vaccinations. (Some children have died within hours
after
receiving vaccine injections.) Author Byron Richards recently authored a
detailed article explaining this: http://www.naturalnews.com/022955.html

This medical mythology goes to great lengths to discount the naturopathic
view of human health, which says that the human immune system should be
supported rather than chemically hijacked, and that when properly
supported
through healthy foods, nutrition and an absence of chemical toxins, the
human immune system is a fantastically effective technology that
accurately
identifies invading viruses and protects the body with an appropriate
immune
system response. Allowing the human immune system to do its job also
subjects it to stresses that allow an adaptive response to unfold -- a
response that strengthens the immune system against future threats,
significantly lowering the risk of infection in the future.

Vaccines, on the other hand, weaken the immune system, denying it the
adaptive response it needs to strengthen its defenses against future
threats. But vaccine promoting health authorities think the only way to
reduce the risk of infection is to administer a never-ending series of
vaccination injections: one for each mutation of a virus that might be
circulating in the wild. At no point does this pro-vaccine medical
mythology
believe the human immune system should take over and that vaccines are no
longer needed. Rather, it is based on the idea that infants, children,
adults and seniors must be subjected to hundreds of different vaccine
injections over their lifetime. Each injection, of course, earns revenue
for
the drug companies that primarily sponsor the continuation of this
outmoded
medical paradigm.


Most vaccines are medically useless
Clinical studies show that vaccines don't work on most people. Even winter
flu shots are little more than a form of medical Russian roulette, since
most vaccines are built to defend against the previous year's viral
strains,
not the current year. And that's if they even work at all: The hard
science
says that senior citizens who receive vaccine shots have absolutely no
reduction whatsoever in their frequency of catching the flu.

Vaccines, for the most part, are little more than modern medical quackery.
It's Big Pharma's version of snake oil. Most vaccines simply don't work on
most people, and some people are harmed or killed by vaccines. And while
defenders of vaccines (most of whom are on the take from Big Pharma in one
way or another, by the way) may claim that vaccines have eradicated
infectious disease in our world over the last century or so, the simple
truth is that advances in public sanitation are responsible for virtually
all the improvements in infant mortality and the eradication of serious
infectious disease.

Far from the mission of saving lives, Big Pharma is now pushing vaccines
for
conditions that pose very little threat to life in the first place. The
fact
that vaccines are now being pushed to prevent infant diarrhea is a perfect
example. If infants are suffering from diarrhea, they need proper
nutrition
(get off those processed infant formula products!) and immune system
support. They do not need to have their immune systems attacked by yet
another chemical cocktail injected into their bodies at Big Pharma profit
centers (also known as clinics and hospitals).

Vaccination is the great medical hoax of our time. One day it will stand
alongside mercury fillings, public water fluoridation, antibiotics abuse,
the cholesterol "disease" hoax and psychiatric drugs as one of the
grandest
medical cons ever perpetrated on the American people. Modern medicine has
become a system driven almost entirely by profit, not by any genuine
desire
to save lives. And the promotion of "treatments" is more about sales and
marketing than disease prevention.

Parents would do well to think twice before submitting their children to
vaccines. Remember this: Autism is not reversible. The damage caused by
vaccines is permanent. Protect your healthy baby from brain damage or
death.
Inform yourself about the side effects of vaccines, and find the courage
to
"just say no" to vaccine quackery.


Inform yourself now
I encourage all parents considering this issue to seek out a qualified
naturopathic health practitioner and find your own answers to this
vaccination question. Some parents may decide to have one or two vaccines
and skip the rest, reducing the total chemical burden on their children.
Some may even decide to subject their children to no vaccines whatsoever.
The choice is yours.

And that's my point, actually. I believe the choice of vaccination should
be
up to the parents, not the government. Medical pill-pushers, on the other
hand, strenuously disagree. They believe so strongly in their vaccine
quackery that they insist parents who refuse to subject their children to
an
unlimited number of vaccines should be arrested, fined or thrown in
prison.
That is the view of mainstream medicine, with all its medical schools,
"scientific" journals and FDA cheerleading. It is a system of medical
imperialism that seeks to overthrow fundamental health freedoms and remove
parents from the chain of decision making that determines the health
outcome
of their own children. Vaccine-pushing doctors and drug companies
literally
seek to criminalize parents who do not agree with their own distorted
opinions on vaccines, and they truly hope to limit consumer choice,
restricting parents to a single system of chemical-based medicine that has
been arbitrarily designated as the one true system of medical belief by
those who stand to gain the most from its adoption.

Vaccines, in other words, have been chosen not because they are based on
scientific validity, but because they are consistent with the shared
illusions that now serve as the very foundation of modern pharmacological
medicine: That the human body has no ability protect or heal itself, and
that any "real medicine" must come from outside the body, to be forcefully
injected where it can override the body's innate biochemistry and
eradicate
some real or imagined threat. For doctors to abandon the mythology of
vaccines, they would have to throw out their entire (mis)understanding of
the human body and start from scratch. And they're not about to venture
down
that road unless someone forces them to... because who knows where that
road
might lead... like, perhaps, to the most frightening of all concepts to
vaccine-pushing doctors: Homeopathy!

Vaccines are popular in the modern medical community for no reason other
than the fact that they support the arrogant notion that doctors do all
the
healing, not patients. That's why the continued mythology of vaccines and
chemical intervention is so dangerous to human health -- because by
definition it excludes the acknowledgement of the only pathway to true
healing: That the patient is the healer and that achieving lasting health
can only be accomplished by supporting the patient's own internal healing
technology... the amazing human immune system!

I guarantee you this: My own immune system knows more about my health than
any doctor. In fact, my own immune system knows more about my health than
my
own conscious mind! It is impossible for a human brain to comprehend the
miraculous complexity of the underlying immune system technology that
protects it.


But are vaccines ever useful?
Of course, there are certain limited situations in which vaccines can be
quite useful. If you're about to work in a class IV biohazard laboratory,
where highly aggressive viruses like Ebola or Marburg can kill you in
minutes or hours, then receiving a vaccine injection to protect you from
these various strains makes good sense because the risk of injury is so
high
from your professional work that it makes the risk of harm from a vaccine
seem small by comparison. But should the public be vaccinated against
these
highly virulent strains? Of course not. Such strains can never become
epidemics for the simple reason that they kill their hosts too quickly.

I'm not kidding when I say that the best way to stop the spread of these
rare, aggressive outbreaks of viral strains from the Conga is for all the
hospital staff to flee into the hills and thereby create distance between
themselves. It is an inarguable, well-documented fact that the primary
hubs
for the spread of such aggressive diseases are, in fact, the hospital
workers themselves. Think about it: Where do sick people go first? To the
hospital! And that's where the virus catches hold and starts to spread.
The
most dangerous place to go during any epidemic is to the hospital.

But getting back to babies and mild viral infections, should babies be
subjected to the risks of vaccines in order to prevent mild, non-fatal
conditions like diarrhea? Of course not. That makes no scientific sense.
It
does, however, make great marketing sense if you're a shareholder for one
of
the companies manufacturing the infant diarrhea vaccines.

Funny thing, though: The healthiest children I see are the ones playing in
the dirt, wearing no sunscreen, breatfeeding and receiving no vaccine
shots
whatsoever. It's all the kids following the modern "scientific" lifestyle
that are sick. They're the ones eating processed foods, drinking
corporate-sponsored infant formula, smearing on toxic sunscreen chemicals,
chugging artificial sports drinks and getting jabbed with needles all the
time. Those are the kids who have allergies and weakened immune systems.
Coincidence? You be the judge.

I can tell you this, though: If I have children, I would never subject
them
to any vaccines. And as they grow up healthy, I'll slap a bumper sticker
on
my car that reads, "My Vaccine-Free Kid is Smarter than Your Honor
Student!"

You may take the survey now, if you haven't already: