This is to all idiots who post on this group

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:09:36 -0800,David Simpson
wrote


I don't agree. He did exactly what I did.

Why are we not surprised?

He educated his children as
to the benefits and dangers of sex which is more than most people do.

Most people WARN their children about pedophiles they do not bring
pedophiles home to **** their children.
-------------------
Why do you lie over and over?? She brought him home.


He told them, I believe, that while he might not be happy about them
having sex he would prefer they did it in the safety of their own home
rather than in the back seat of a car.

Ther is no safety for a child in a home where the parents allow
pedophiles in to **** their children.
-----------------------------
He was no pedophile, he had zero interest in pre-pubescent children!


He also encouraged his children
to bring home their partners so that he could assess them.

Any adult wanting sex with an eleven year old child is a pedophile..
What assessment is needed?
----------------------------
You are obviously deficient of the definition of a pedophile, and are
using ignorant trailer-trash notions of such.
Steve

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in
:

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:09:36 -0800,David Simpson
wrote


I don't agree. He did exactly what I did.

Why are we not surprised?

He educated his children as
to the benefits and dangers of sex which is more than most people
do.

Most people WARN their children about pedophiles they do not bring
pedophiles home to **** their children.
-------------------
Why do you lie over and over?? She brought him home.

children who bring home adults to **** have been carefully taught that
it is o.k. to **** adults.

even if you didn't **** your children, as you claim, congrats on the
mind ****. when i "brought home" a 30-year old as a 16-year old after
having been repeatedly raped as a 7-11 year old by an 80-year old, my
father shut down the relationship. i hated my father for it for about a
month, then forgot about it. when i saw the guy again, almost 20 years
later, over the holidays, i thanked my father.

gosh, maybe you should call my dad and me and set us straight with your
inarguable wisdom, r. steve.

****.

you won't though.

goddammitt.

i mean, i already gave you my street address, zip included, to set up a
time to talk, and you stood me up.

wuss.




He told them, I believe, that while he might not be happy about them
having sex he would prefer they did it in the safety of their own
home rather than in the back seat of a car.

Ther is no safety for a child in a home where the parents allow
pedophiles in to **** their children.
-----------------------------
He was no pedophile, he had zero interest in pre-pubescent children!


He also encouraged his children
to bring home their partners so that he could assess them.

Any adult wanting sex with an eleven year old child is a pedophile..
What assessment is needed?
----------------------------
You are obviously deficient of the definition of a pedophile, and are
using ignorant trailer-trash notions of such.
Steve


you are obviously desperate to justify your self-perceived unstoppable
attraction to sex between adults and children (for whatever reason, and
whether or not you "actively" participate in the sex) with semantics.

ok so let's just all argue semantics til the proverbial cows come home
(and after that, too) while we enjoy our (also proverbial) soap boxes
while our children get ****ed (sticks cliche tongue into cliche cheek)
to their hearts' content by horny, selfish, bratty grown-ups who don't
have the balls to **** people their own age.

so.....

while our kids are lubricating and pre-cumming (and maybe dissasociating
and bleeding) for the salacious adults stroking them on the kitchen
table or in the next room, we need to define pedophilia and child
molestation and puberty.

let's party!! whooo-hoooo.

(puh-lease)

friendly face wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in
:

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:09:36 -0800,David Simpson
wrote


I don't agree. He did exactly what I did.

Why are we not surprised?

He educated his children as
to the benefits and dangers of sex which is more than most people
do.

Most people WARN their children about pedophiles they do not bring
pedophiles home to **** their children.
-------------------
Why do you lie over and over?? She brought him home.

children who bring home adults to **** have been carefully taught that
it is o.k. to **** adults.
----------------------------
No, all they have been taught is NOT that any sex they want is bad.


even if you didn't **** your children, as you claim, congrats on the
mind ****. when i "brought home" a 30-year old as a 16-year old after
having been repeatedly raped as a 7-11 year old by an 80-year old, my
father shut down the relationship. i hated my father for it for about a
month, then forgot about it. when i saw the guy again, almost 20 years
later, over the holidays, i thanked my father.
------------------------
God, after being that ****ed up it's a lucky thing you can talk, even
if your thinking is still as distorted as all hell! Of course you'll
never know precisely how ****ed up you are, because you'll never know
what normal is.


gosh, maybe you should call my dad and me and set us straight with your
inarguable wisdom, r. steve.

****.

you won't though.

goddammitt.

i mean, i already gave you my street address, zip included, to set up a
time to talk, and you stood me up.

wuss.
------------------
Liar.


He told them, I believe, that while he might not be happy about them
having sex he would prefer they did it in the safety of their own
home rather than in the back seat of a car.

Ther is no safety for a child in a home where the parents allow
pedophiles in to **** their children.
-----------------------------
He was no pedophile, he had zero interest in pre-pubescent children!

He also encouraged his children
to bring home their partners so that he could assess them.

Any adult wanting sex with an eleven year old child is a pedophile..
What assessment is needed?
----------------------------
You are obviously deficient of the definition of a pedophile, and are
using ignorant trailer-trash notions of such.
Steve

you are obviously desperate to justify your self-perceived unstoppable
attraction to sex between adults and children (for whatever reason, and
whether or not you "actively" participate in the sex) with semantics.
------------------------------
Liar.
Since I haven't any particular desire for kids, all I'm doing is
politically supporting their right to have sex with whomever they
choose.
Steve

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in
:

friendly face wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in
:

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:09:36 -0800,David Simpson
wrote


I don't agree. He did exactly what I did.

Why are we not surprised?

He educated his children as
to the benefits and dangers of sex which is more than most people
do.

Most people WARN their children about pedophiles they do not bring
pedophiles home to **** their children.
-------------------
Why do you lie over and over?? She brought him home.

children who bring home adults to **** have been carefully taught
that it is o.k. to **** adults.
----------------------------
No, all they have been taught is NOT that any sex they want is bad.

right. they have been taught that if they want sex with adults it is
o.k. to **** adults. that's what i just said.


even if you didn't **** your children, as you claim, congrats on the
mind ****. when i "brought home" a 30-year old as a 16-year old
after having been repeatedly raped as a 7-11 year old by an 80-year
old, my father shut down the relationship. i hated my father for it
for about a month, then forgot about it. when i saw the guy again,
almost 20 years later, over the holidays, i thanked my father.
------------------------
God, after being that ****ed up it's a lucky thing you can talk, even
if your thinking is still as distorted as all hell! Of course you'll
never know precisely how ****ed up you are, because you'll never know
what normal is.

thanks for the compassion. i'll keep this short since i feel a
catharsis coming on.

gosh, maybe you should call my dad and me and set us straight with
your inarguable wisdom, r. steve.

****.

you won't though.

goddammitt.

i mean, i already gave you my street address, zip included, to set up
a time to talk, and you stood me up.

wuss.
------------------
Liar.

it's NOT a lie!! did you actually miss those posts? i sent you some
suggestions for a time. you picked a time. and then i sent my address.
i confirmed the time, told you i'd make the munchies if you would bring
the beer. really thought you might actually show up, but you didn't. i
thought you stood me up? but maybe you just didn't see the next post?

(er, friday daytimes are still good....)


He told them, I believe, that while he might not be happy about
them having sex he would prefer they did it in the safety of
their own home rather than in the back seat of a car.

Ther is no safety for a child in a home where the parents allow
pedophiles in to **** their children.
-----------------------------
He was no pedophile, he had zero interest in pre-pubescent
children!

He also encouraged his children
to bring home their partners so that he could assess them.

Any adult wanting sex with an eleven year old child is a
pedophile.. What assessment is needed?
----------------------------
You are obviously deficient of the definition of a pedophile, and
are using ignorant trailer-trash notions of such.
Steve

you are obviously desperate to justify your self-perceived
unstoppable attraction to sex between adults and children (for
whatever reason, and whether or not you "actively" participate in the
sex) with semantics.
------------------------------
Liar.
Since I haven't any particular desire for kids, all I'm doing is
politically supporting their right to have sex with whomever they
choose.
Steve

noble cause. you must enjoy that.

friendly face wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in
:

children who bring home adults to **** have been carefully taught
that it is o.k. to **** adults.
----------------------------
No, all they have been taught is NOT that any sex they want is bad.

right. they have been taught that if they want sex with adults it is
o.k. to **** adults. that's what i just said.
---------------------------------
No. You're deluded. Kids do NOT have to be TAUGHT that sex is alright,
they ONLY must NOT BE TAUGHT that is NOT alright. You fail to realize
that the Natural procliviries of children who are NOT ABUSED by your
kind of bull**** are to seek and enjoy sex because they were not made
ashamed or afraid of it!! They need NOT be "taught" that!!
Steve

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:

On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:55:47 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
wrote:

friendly face wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in
:

children who bring home adults to **** have been carefully taught
that it is o.k. to **** adults.
----------------------------
No, all they have been taught is NOT that any sex they want is bad.

right. they have been taught that if they want sex with adults it is
o.k. to **** adults. that's what i just said.
---------------------------------
No. You're deluded. Kids do NOT have to be TAUGHT that sex is alright,
they ONLY must NOT BE TAUGHT that is NOT alright. You fail to realize
that the Natural procliviries of children who are NOT ABUSED by your
kind of bull**** are to seek and enjoy sex because they were not made
ashamed or afraid of it!! They need NOT be "taught" that!!

Capital N for natural..

The certain unmistakable badge of the k00k.
------------------------------
Calling adversary a "k00k", the unmistakable mark of the loser of the
previous argument.
Steve

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:

On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:59:43 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
wrote:

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:

On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:55:47 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
wrote:

friendly face wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in
:

children who bring home adults to **** have been carefully taught
that it is o.k. to **** adults.
----------------------------
No, all they have been taught is NOT that any sex they want is bad.

right. they have been taught that if they want sex with adults it is
o.k. to **** adults. that's what i just said.
---------------------------------
No. You're deluded. Kids do NOT have to be TAUGHT that sex is alright,
they ONLY must NOT BE TAUGHT that is NOT alright. You fail to realize
that the Natural procliviries of children who are NOT ABUSED by your
kind of bull**** are to seek and enjoy sex because they were not made
ashamed or afraid of it!! They need NOT be "taught" that!!

Capital N for natural..

The certain unmistakable badge of the k00k.
------------------------------
Calling adversary a "k00k", the unmistakable mark of the loser of
the previous argument.
Steve