A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Am I responsible for daycare on my week with a stay-at-home mom?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old November 17th 04, 06:20 PM
Gini
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Mikey says...

Gini wrote in message ...
In article , Mikey says...
...........................

Ya' know, I understand all of this "be fair to the kids" stuff, as in,
pay child support so that both houses have roughly the same lifestyle.

====
That isn't the position of the state. The state (excepting a few--PA is one) is
not concerned with equality of the separate homes. The NCP is expected to have a
substantial decline in lifestyle so that the CP's lifestyle (NOT the childrens')
is commensurate with a two-earner family--As though the divorce never occured.
====
====



Wow, why not just poor salt in the wound. I'd rather they at least
explain it as what's best for the kids, not the CP.

===
They do. I don't.
===
Why should the CP
get squat, that's what alimony is for,

===
No can do. Alimony is taxable. CS is not (to the CP). Divorce settlements are
intended to make life as stress free and easy for the CP (woman) as possible
regardless of whom wanted out and for what reason (no fault).
===
if it's found to be needed and
justified.


  #12  
Old November 18th 04, 01:59 PM
Mikey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gini wrote in message ...
In article , Mikey says...

Gini wrote in message ...
In article , Mikey says...
...........................

Ya' know, I understand all of this "be fair to the kids" stuff, as in,
pay child support so that both houses have roughly the same lifestyle.
====
That isn't the position of the state. The state (excepting a few--PA is one) is
not concerned with equality of the separate homes. The NCP is expected to have a
substantial decline in lifestyle so that the CP's lifestyle (NOT the childrens')
is commensurate with a two-earner family--As though the divorce never occured.
====
====



Wow, why not just poor salt in the wound. I'd rather they at least
explain it as what's best for the kids, not the CP.

===
They do. I don't.
===
Why should the CP
get squat, that's what alimony is for,

===
No can do. Alimony is taxable. CS is not (to the CP). Divorce settlements are
intended to make life as stress free and easy for the CP (woman) as possible
regardless of whom wanted out and for what reason (no fault).
===
if it's found to be needed and
justified.


That's it, I'm moving to Europe.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to stay home with my Baby!!!! Chasity Pullum Pregnancy 2 April 22nd 13 10:24 AM
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year [email protected] Info and FAQ's 0 October 29th 04 05:23 AM
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year [email protected] Info and FAQ's 0 September 29th 04 05:17 AM
Anything in FH make u afraid? Cw mandated to ask Kane Foster Parents 20 July 19th 04 02:12 PM
DCF CT monitor finds kids *worsen* while in state custody Kane General 8 August 13th 03 07:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.