If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Mikey says...
Gini wrote in message ... In article , Mikey says... ........................... Ya' know, I understand all of this "be fair to the kids" stuff, as in, pay child support so that both houses have roughly the same lifestyle. ==== That isn't the position of the state. The state (excepting a few--PA is one) is not concerned with equality of the separate homes. The NCP is expected to have a substantial decline in lifestyle so that the CP's lifestyle (NOT the childrens') is commensurate with a two-earner family--As though the divorce never occured. ==== ==== Wow, why not just poor salt in the wound. I'd rather they at least explain it as what's best for the kids, not the CP. === They do. I don't. === Why should the CP get squat, that's what alimony is for, === No can do. Alimony is taxable. CS is not (to the CP). Divorce settlements are intended to make life as stress free and easy for the CP (woman) as possible regardless of whom wanted out and for what reason (no fault). === if it's found to be needed and justified. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Gini wrote in message ...
In article , Mikey says... Gini wrote in message ... In article , Mikey says... ........................... Ya' know, I understand all of this "be fair to the kids" stuff, as in, pay child support so that both houses have roughly the same lifestyle. ==== That isn't the position of the state. The state (excepting a few--PA is one) is not concerned with equality of the separate homes. The NCP is expected to have a substantial decline in lifestyle so that the CP's lifestyle (NOT the childrens') is commensurate with a two-earner family--As though the divorce never occured. ==== ==== Wow, why not just poor salt in the wound. I'd rather they at least explain it as what's best for the kids, not the CP. === They do. I don't. === Why should the CP get squat, that's what alimony is for, === No can do. Alimony is taxable. CS is not (to the CP). Divorce settlements are intended to make life as stress free and easy for the CP (woman) as possible regardless of whom wanted out and for what reason (no fault). === if it's found to be needed and justified. That's it, I'm moving to Europe. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to stay home with my Baby!!!! | Chasity Pullum | Pregnancy | 2 | April 22nd 13 10:24 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | October 29th 04 05:23 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | September 29th 04 05:17 AM |
Anything in FH make u afraid? Cw mandated to ask | Kane | Foster Parents | 20 | July 19th 04 02:12 PM |
DCF CT monitor finds kids *worsen* while in state custody | Kane | General | 8 | August 13th 03 07:43 AM |