If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0)
On Nov 11, 11:02 pm, "JOHN" wrote:
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/shea.html The first problem is that there are over 100 strains of HPV, only 30 of which are even theoretically linked with cervical cancer. In addition, HPV is present in at least half the normal population, almost never causing any disease or problems whatsoever. Indeed, HPV has never been proven as a pathogen for any disease. Wrong, HPV has been proven numerous times to being involved in 100% of CIN III and 99.7% of cervical cancer. And yes, there are over 100 HPV strains, but HPV 16 and 18 account for over 70% of all cervical cancers. If you give us numbers, give us all of them, not only those who suit you. ....All that has ever been shown is that HPV is sometimes present in cervical cancer tissue, but as we know it's also present in half the normal population. There is a total lack of evidence that cervical cancer appears in women with HPV more often than in women without it. And yet this will be the focus of the vaccine: to pretend to eliminate this ubiquitous virus from the body. Wrong, as already said, HPV is almost always (99.7%) present in women with cervical cancer. The second enormous impediment to credibility is that the average age for cervical cancer is 50 years. But the plan is to mandate Gardasil to 12 years olds. And the manufacturer is only claiming efficacy for 5 years. So using their own statistics, this makes the vaccine worthless in the long run, because by the time most females need immunity, it will have worn off long ago. Wrong, the immunity lasts for your life. Be thankful of that, otherwise you'd have to vaccinate the girls every 5-10 years. And the idea behind vaccinating 12 year olds is that by the age of 12, they (hopefully) haven't had sex and therefore haven't already catched the HPV. ....The original phrase used by Merck to link HPV with cervical cancer was "there is a strong connection." How that phrase got transformed to 'is the cause of' in the past two years is more a matter of marketing than of science. Gardasil's not been evaluated for carcinogenicity or impairment of fertility. That's great. They want to vaccinate all American 12 year olds with a vaccine for cancer and they don't even know for sure whether or not it causes cancer, or makes the recipients infertile. Yeah, sign my kid up for that one. HPV - The First Cancer Vaccine Dr Tim O'Shea Your conclusions are wrong, as shown a few lines up in this answer. And claiming that the HPV vaccine may make you infertile is a shameful wild speculation lacking not only any evidence, but also any possible biological mechanism. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0)
"SanHolo" wrote in message Wrong, the immunity lasts for your life. Be thankful of that, How come the package insert says: "The duration of immunity following a complete schedule of immunization with GARDASIL has not been established." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0)
On Nov 12, 1:22 pm, "JOHN" wrote:
"SanHolo" wrote in message Wrong, the immunity lasts for your life. Be thankful of that, How come the package insert says: "The duration of immunity following a complete schedule of immunization with GARDASIL has not been established." Maybe because Gardasil has not been available for long enough to ensure that? But it _should_ last long enough based on current knowledge; only time will tell if they were right with that conclusion. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0)
"SanHolo" wrote in message ups.com... On Nov 12, 1:22 pm, "JOHN" wrote: "SanHolo" wrote in message Wrong, the immunity lasts for your life. Be thankful of that, How come the package insert says: "The duration of immunity following a complete schedule of immunization with GARDASIL has not been established." Maybe because Gardasil has not been available for long enough to ensure that? But it _should_ last long enough based on current knowledge; only time will tell if they were right with that conclusion. Corn holio, Have you had this problem truth long? Why can you not simply admit that your statement was false? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0)
On Nov 12, 2:50 pm, "t" wrote:
"SanHolo" wrote in message ups.com... On Nov 12, 1:22 pm, "JOHN" wrote: "SanHolo" wrote in message Wrong, the immunity lasts for your life. Be thankful of that, How come the package insert says: "The duration of immunity following a complete schedule of immunization with GARDASIL has not been established." Maybe because Gardasil has not been available for long enough to ensure that? But it _should_ last long enough based on current knowledge; only time will tell if they were right with that conclusion. Corn holio, Have you had this problem truth long? Why can you not simply admit that your statement was false? It wasn't false since obviously even the developers of Gardasil think this to be true. If I truly was wrong, Gardasil would be on vaccination schedule every 10 years like diphtheria or tetanus is. John is right with his quote, it's not possible to _establish_ the duration of immunity, but that does not make my statement wrong. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0)
"SanHolo" wrote in message It wasn't false since obviously even the developers of Gardasil think this to be true. If I truly was wrong, Gardasil would be on vaccination schedule every 10 years like diphtheria or tetanus is. John is right with his quote, it's not possible to _establish_ the duration of immunity, but that does not make my statement wrong. LOL. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0)
"JOHN" wrote in message ... "SanHolo" wrote in message Wrong, the immunity lasts for your life. Be thankful of that, How come the package insert says: "The duration of immunity following a complete schedule of immunization with GARDASIL has not been established." Once again, it looks like "SanHolo" hasn't done his pharma-assigned homework! He's just flying here on a wing and a prayer... Yuri. Yuri Kuchinsky -=O=- http://www.globalserve.net/~yuku "May as well consult a butcher on the value of vegetarianism as a doctor on the worth of vaccination." -- George Bernard Shaw |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0) | SanHolo | Pregnancy | 24 | November 13th 07 04:58 AM |
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0) | SanHolo | Kids Health | 24 | November 13th 07 04:58 AM |
Gardasil, another great Merck product ;0) | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 0 | November 11th 07 11:52 PM |
Gardasil Video ... good to see for anyone considering this Merck Drug | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 7 | October 4th 07 01:10 AM |
Gardasil Video ... good to see for anyone considering this Merck Drug | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 0 | September 14th 07 07:38 PM |