If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
U.S. Court To Hear DCF Plea
U.S. Court To Hear DCF Plea
February 9, 2004 By COLIN POITRAS, Courant Staff Writer State officials looking to renegotiate tens of millions of dollars' worth of federally ordered improvements to the Department of Children and Families are getting their day in court. U.S. District Judge Alan H. Nevas has agreed to listen to the state's argument that his court-ordered improvements are unfair at a hearing scheduled for noon Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport. The hearing has huge significance to the state as the legislature begins preparing a budget for the coming fiscal year. The 28-page order Nevas handed down in December compelled the department to meet 22 specific standards of care for foster children in order for the agency to remove itself from federal oversight. The improvements range from reducing workers' caseloads to speeding adoptions and providing better medical, dental and mental health care. The agency has until November 2006 to get the job done. The 22 standards Nevas adopted were recommended by federal court monitor D. Ray Sirry as part of a plan for the agency to avoid federal receivership and end a 12-year-old federal consent decree. State officials say some of the standards are unreasonable and excessive. Office of Policy and Management Secretary Marc Ryan, the state's budget czar, has said that making such a massive investment of resources requires full legislative approval and could violate the state's spending cap. Ryan, Sirry and DCF Commissioner Darlene Dunbar are managing the department as part of a special task force overseeing the sweeping changes. Attorneys representing thousands of abused and neglected children who rely on the department for foster care have called the state's arguments frivolous and say they have no basis in law. The attorneys, who represent the children in the federal class-action lawsuit that led to the consent decree, say the latest move is another attempt by the state to avoid its responsibilities. Under an earlier agreement, the lawyers say, the court-ordered improvements are supposed to be binding and nonnegotiable. http://www.ctnow.com/news/local/hc-d...eadlines-local Defend your civil liberties! Get information at http://www.aclu.org, become a member at http://www.aclu.org/join and get active at http://www.aclu.org/action. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Florida Fluoride Is For Faucets - Not People! | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | July 20th 04 07:46 PM |
Canadian Court Rethinks Spanking | Hammer | Spanking | 0 | January 25th 04 07:54 PM |