Merck's deliberate deception

Los Angeles Times have an article showing how Merck & Co. continued to
supply infant vaccine containing a mercury preservative for two years after
declaring that it had eliminated the chemical.

(More than 4,200 parents have filed claims in the federal Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, alleging that their children suffered autism or other
neurological disorders from mercury in their shots.)

http://www.nynewsday.com/news/health...alth-headlines

Ugly Doug wrote:

Los Angeles Times have an article showing how Merck & Co. continued to
supply infant vaccine containing a mercury preservative for two years after
declaring that it had eliminated the chemical.

(More than 4,200 parents have filed claims in the federal Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, alleging that their children suffered autism or other
neurological disorders from mercury in their shots.)
--------------------------
Except that they didn't and you're lying once again by talking about
two different vaccines at once simply in order to be deceptive.
Steve

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
...
Ugly Doug wrote:

Los Angeles Times have an article showing how Merck & Co. continued to
supply infant vaccine containing a mercury preservative for two years
after
declaring that it had eliminated the chemical.

(More than 4,200 parents have filed claims in the federal Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, alleging that their children suffered autism or
other
neurological disorders from mercury in their shots.)
--------------------------
Except that they didn't and you're lying once again by talking about
two different vaccines at once simply in order to be deceptive.
Steve

No, you deleted the source, in your inept attempt to pretend that I was
lying. See the source on:
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/health...alth-headlines

If you've got a problem with what the newspapers said, which I was quoting,
take it up with them, Troll!

Doug

Ugly Doug wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
...
Ugly Doug wrote:

Los Angeles Times have an article showing how Merck & Co. continued to
supply infant vaccine containing a mercury preservative for two years
after
declaring that it had eliminated the chemical.

(More than 4,200 parents have filed claims in the federal Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, alleging that their children suffered autism or
other
neurological disorders from mercury in their shots.)
--------------------------
Except that they didn't and you're lying once again by talking about
two different vaccines at once simply in order to be deceptive.
Steve

No, you deleted the source, in your inept attempt to pretend that I was
lying.
-------------------------------
That wasn't a "source", that was a 404 error, so I deleted it again,
you ****-****ing liar.


If you've got a problem with what the newspapers said, which I was quoting,
take it up with them, Troll!

Doug
----------------
You're the troll, troll, and a ****ing liar. Anyway, that was an off-
beat paper which cultivates cranks, you ****, and not a decent "source"
of anything!
Steve

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
...
Ugly Doug wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
...
Ugly Doug wrote:

Los Angeles Times have an article showing how Merck & Co. continued
to
supply infant vaccine containing a mercury preservative for two
years
after
declaring that it had eliminated the chemical.

(More than 4,200 parents have filed claims in the federal Vaccine
Injury
Compensation Program, alleging that their children suffered autism
or
other
neurological disorders from mercury in their shots.)
--------------------------
Except that they didn't and you're lying once again by talking about
two different vaccines at once simply in order to be deceptive.
Steve

No, you deleted the source, in your inept attempt to pretend that I was
lying.
-------------------------------
That wasn't a "source", that was a 404 error, so I deleted it again,
you ****-****ing liar.


If you've got a problem with what the newspapers said, which I was
quoting,
take it up with them, Troll!

Doug
----------------
You're the troll, troll, and a ****ing liar. Anyway, that was an off-
beat paper which cultivates cranks, you ****, and not a decent "source"
of anything!
Steve

Ah! If you can't argue with what it says, argue against the reliability! An
old tactic. Pity it never works!

Doug

Ugly Doug wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
...
Ugly Doug wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
...
Ugly Doug wrote:

Los Angeles Times have an article showing how Merck & Co. continued
to
supply infant vaccine containing a mercury preservative for two
years
after
declaring that it had eliminated the chemical.

(More than 4,200 parents have filed claims in the federal Vaccine
Injury
Compensation Program, alleging that their children suffered autism
or
other
neurological disorders from mercury in their shots.)
--------------------------
Except that they didn't and you're lying once again by talking about
two different vaccines at once simply in order to be deceptive.
Steve

No, you deleted the source, in your inept attempt to pretend that I was
lying.
-------------------------------
That wasn't a "source", that was a 404 error, so I deleted it again,
you ****-****ing liar.


If you've got a problem with what the newspapers said, which I was
quoting,
take it up with them, Troll!

Doug
----------------
You're the troll, troll, and a ****ing liar. Anyway, that was an off-
beat paper which cultivates cranks, you ****, and not a decent "source"
of anything!
Steve

Ah! If you can't argue with what it says,
-----------------------------
Oh that's even easier, but it said NOTHING, your url was a 404 error.
I wasn't teasing.


argue against the
reliability! An old tactic. Pity it never works!

Doug
----------------------------
It's a rag, it's known to be a crank rag.

Reliability? HAH!! It is to laugh!
Steve