If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What? I thought DCSE is not supposed to represent the custodial parent.
Here's a quotation from an article appearing in the Potomac News, a
Prince William County-based newspaper, where the Director of the Division of Child Support Enforcement is justifying the $25 fee they're imposing on custodial parents receiving at least $500 of child support annually: "Where could you hire a lawyer, an accountant, a court specialist and case worker for $2 a month?" Young said. The entire article is here, although the media all across the Commonwealth appear to be really worked up about this $25 fee...none will do a story on the class action lawsuit pending against DCSE though. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What? I thought DCSE is not supposed to represent the custodial parent.
wrote in Here's a quotation from an article appearing in the Potomac News, a Prince William County-based newspaper, where the Director of the Division of Child Support Enforcement is justifying the $25 fee they're imposing on custodial parents receiving at least $500 of child support annually: So that's everybody in the system! It's only $25 today, 10 years from now it will be $2500 and all justified! It's just a nice Christmas bonus for the directors in appreciation for all their hard work! LOLOLOLOL |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What? I thought DCSE is not supposed to represent the custodial parent.
On Aug 28, 12:58 pm, "DB" wrote:
wrote in Here's a quotation from an article appearing in the Potomac News, a Prince William County-based newspaper, where the Director of the Division of Child Support Enforcement is justifying the $25 fee they're imposing on custodial parents receiving at least $500 of child support annually: So that's everybody in the system! It's only $25 today, 10 years from now it will be $2500 and all justified! It's just a nice Christmas bonus for the directors in appreciation for all their hard work! LOLOLOLOL No, I'm sure the CPs will complain they can't live with 25 less a year, so the NCP should pay... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What? I thought DCSE is not supposed to represent the custodial parent.
wrote in message oups.com... Here's a quotation from an article appearing in the Potomac News, a Prince William County-based newspaper, where the Director of the Division of Child Support Enforcement is justifying the $25 fee they're imposing on custodial parents receiving at least $500 of child support annually: "Where could you hire a lawyer, an accountant, a court specialist and case worker for $2 a month?" Young said. The entire article is here, although the media all across the Commonwealth appear to be really worked up about this $25 fee...none will do a story on the class action lawsuit pending against DCSE though. This change is absurd and turns the CS system on its head! For years CSE insisted obligors were the only parents to interact formally with the state in support establishment and enforcement proceedings. They claimed they had difficulty getting IV-D staff to accept their role to interact with both parents. Some states faced litigation to force IV-D staff to recognize their responsibility to obligees as well as obligors. Now Virginia wants parents to accept the fact they are providing services for hire to obligees and they should be allowed to charge for those services. What happened to change the CS and CSE model to become an advocate for obligees when their stated purpose is to manage the state's relationship with obligors? I suspect Virginia has finally come to the realization they are advocates for obligees against the rights of the obligors. This change is a clear signal the state is no longer neutral in CS matters. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What? I thought DCSE is not supposed to represent the custodial parent.
The thing is the FEE's come from EVERYONE involved!
The government is such a bad stewart of the money in its care that its not funny and WHO can step in to "take over" like the state does when a city goes belly up? (the city of Hamtramck in Michigan went into "recievership" years ago and had to lay off ALL its employees due to them being bankrupt!) The state and county had to take over all services when that happened. "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... Here's a quotation from an article appearing in the Potomac News, a Prince William County-based newspaper, where the Director of the Division of Child Support Enforcement is justifying the $25 fee they're imposing on custodial parents receiving at least $500 of child support annually: "Where could you hire a lawyer, an accountant, a court specialist and case worker for $2 a month?" Young said. The entire article is here, although the media all across the Commonwealth appear to be really worked up about this $25 fee...none will do a story on the class action lawsuit pending against DCSE though. This change is absurd and turns the CS system on its head! For years CSE insisted obligors were the only parents to interact formally with the state in support establishment and enforcement proceedings. They claimed they had difficulty getting IV-D staff to accept their role to interact with both parents. Some states faced litigation to force IV-D staff to recognize their responsibility to obligees as well as obligors. Now Virginia wants parents to accept the fact they are providing services for hire to obligees and they should be allowed to charge for those services. What happened to change the CS and CSE model to become an advocate for obligees when their stated purpose is to manage the state's relationship with obligors? I suspect Virginia has finally come to the realization they are advocates for obligees against the rights of the obligors. This change is a clear signal the state is no longer neutral in CS matters. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
father becoming custodial parent and changing child support orders | toddneedsadvise | Child Support | 21 | January 4th 07 09:47 PM |
Self-Represent Law resource | TrashBBRT | Child Support | 0 | May 22nd 04 10:09 PM |
Custodial Parent Won't Communicate | Child Support | 23 | May 22nd 04 04:31 PM | |
How to Represent Yourself in Court | Wizardlaw | Single Parents | 0 | March 28th 04 10:45 PM |
Social Services: Non Custodial Parent Weapon? | Jason Fackler | Single Parents | 3 | December 9th 03 02:50 PM |