A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Pregnancy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tri-phasic BBT and negative HPT



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 30th 03, 07:46 PM
Ilse Witch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tri-phasic BBT and negative HPT

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:51:40 -0500, SMK wrote:

Have you had normal 28 day cycles aftre your m/c?


I've had one AF after the m/c, this was my second. The cycle after the m/c
was about 28 days, starting the count from the day my BBT dropped (which
it usually does on CD1). My impression was that it definitely was an
implantation error this time, judging from other symptoms. But then again,
I also have a very vivid imaginations. Whatever, I am OK with it now, and
we'll just keep on trying.

--
-- I
mommy to DS (17m)
mommy to a tiny angel (Oct 2003)
guardian of DH (33)
TTC #2.5
War doesn't decide who's right, only who's left

  #12  
Old December 30th 03, 10:50 PM
Elle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tri-phasic BBT and negative HPT

Ilse Witch wrote in message ...
It was quite a blast (in the negative sense) to learn that a tri-phasic
BBT doesn't imply pregnancy.


What a disappointment Ilse. In my many many readings of TCOYF I
interpreted the triphasic to be only a strong *indication* of possible
pregnancy and then definite of course if the high temps span 18 days.
Sometimes also there is the slow rising temp, where maybe what looked
like a jump is actually just a natural rise, but I think you are an
experienced enough temp-er to recognize that.

It is so annoying that just when you think you know what 'typical' is
for your cycle something new and weird happens. It always makes me
doubt the reliability of my cycles/my body, and I think suffering a
loss compounds those doubts.

Good luck
Elle
  #13  
Old December 30th 03, 11:18 PM
Ilse Witch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tri-phasic BBT and negative HPT

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:50:30 -0800, Elle wrote:

Ilse Witch wrote in message
...
It was quite a blast (in the negative sense) to learn that a tri-phasic
BBT doesn't imply pregnancy.


What a disappointment Ilse. In my many many readings of TCOYF I
interpreted the triphasic to be only a strong *indication* of possible
pregnancy and then definite of course if the high temps span 18 days.


Thanks Elle. Yes, when reading back that is what it says, but it could be
interpreted either way. And being an optimist...

It is so annoying that just when you think you know what 'typical' is
for your cycle something new and weird happens. It always makes me doubt
the reliability of my cycles/my body, and I think suffering a loss
compounds those doubts.


True enough. But I do start to develop a sort of gut feeling about what is
going on. I think my body is actually more reliable than I give it credit
for, it's the thermometer that I sometimes seriously doubt...

--
-- I
mommy to DS (17m)
mommy to a tiny angel (Oct 2003)
guardian of DH (33)
TTC #2.5
War doesn't decide who's right, only who's left

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.