One less threat

Tennessee woman who kills her husband did her children a favor. She removed
the father from their lives thus eliminating a threat to them. The feminists
and "child support" people ought to be jumping for joy now.

"Chris" wrote in message
news:az3Vf.1214$qd.461@fed1read08...
Tennessee woman who kills her husband did her children a favor. She
removed
the father from their lives thus eliminating a threat to them. The
feminists
and "child support" people ought to be jumping for joy now.

Huh..?? Care to enlighten us?

Got a site or other place we can check out your facts...? If not, you're
nothing more than another antagonist.

"Dusty" wrote in message ...
"Chris" wrote in message news:az3Vf.1214$qd.461@fed1read08...
Tennessee woman who kills her husband did her children a favor. She removed
the father from their lives thus eliminating a threat to them. The feminists
and "child support" people ought to be jumping for joy now.

Huh..?? Care to enlighten us?

Got a site or other place we can check out your facts...? If not, you're nothing more than another antagonist.

He's an antagonist. The father was a minister, and there was no mention of divorce, or child support.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/nati...=1&oref=slogin

(psst.,...... it's the AP, it's only posted on the ny times site - you can find the same AP listing on any online
newspaper that carried the Associated Press)

He's an antagonist. The father was a minister, and there was no mention
of divorce, or child support.

It's been all over the news, but the police are not saying anything about
motive yet.

As per usual, some will assume that something went wrong where there is a
woman involved. Roll Eyes

"DB" wrote in message . com...

He's an antagonist. The father was a minister, and there was no mention of divorce, or child support.

It's been all over the news, but the police are not saying anything about motive yet.

As per usual, some will assume that something went wrong where there is a woman involved. Roll Eyes

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...LATE=DEFA ULT

"Tennessee Bureau of Investigation agent John Mehr said police know why Winkler shot her husband, but he would not
disclose the motive except to say police did not believe it was infidelity. He would not comment on whether Mary Winkler
had accused her husband of abuse. Court papers offered no hint of a motive.'"

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...LATE=DEFA ULT

"Mary and Matthew Winkler were married in 1996. They met at Freed-Hardeman
University, a Church of Christ-affiliated school in Henderson where
Matthew's father was an adjunct professor. Mary took education classes, and
Matthew took Bible classes. Neither graduated."

Hmmm, wonder how this works with Tonita's theory of human nature?

Here we have a good Christian woman with a loaded gun and look what she did
with it!

If there was a problem in the marriage and all the laws in her favor, what
possible motive could she use to justify killing the man?

"DB" wrote
............

If there was a problem in the marriage and all the laws in her favor, what
possible motive could she use to justify killing the man?
==
All we know now is that it was his fault, just as it was Rusty's fault his
wife killed their kids.
It is well known that the only demons residing in women are the ones men put
there.
==

"Dusty" wrote in message
...
"Chris" wrote in message
news:az3Vf.1214$qd.461@fed1read08...
Tennessee woman who kills her husband did her children a favor. She
removed
the father from their lives thus eliminating a threat to them. The
feminists
and "child support" people ought to be jumping for joy now.

Huh..?? Care to enlighten us?

Got a site or other place we can check out your facts...? If not, you're
nothing more than another antagonist.

You wouldn't think for one second that these folks separate a father from
his children because he is an asset to their well being, would you?

"Chris" wrote in message
news:az3Vf.1214$qd.461@fed1read08...
Tennessee woman who kills her husband did her children a favor. She
removed
the father from their lives thus eliminating a threat to them. The
feminists
and "child support" people ought to be jumping for joy now.

Actually, I'd think they'd be rather ****ed off. Just think about it, one
less man to pilfer money from means that it's that much less interest, fees
and penalties that CSE can charge for. They make less money for the state,
therefore, less Federal taxpayer money the state can get it's greedy mitts
on to spend.

I'll grant you that the femitwits would be overjoyed, but they're wing-nuts
anyway.