If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
Chris wrote:
Then what is your excuse for this lame troll? Why are you so desperate to get the attention of people who consider you a useless pile of ****? I'm not. Then explain your trolling. Do you just like the negative attention? Do you miss the feminazis you dislike so much? Are you just incredibly stupid? Are you just lonely? No. Are YOU? See above. You are proclaiming EXACTLY that. You are claiming that you should not be responsible for your kids because it is not your choice. Not even CLOSE. With all due respect, is English your second language? You are either stupid or lying, I don't care which. You are willing to lie Untrue. But I welcome you to prove that I do not believe my own claim. Done. from one post to the next to try and make your silly point and you wonder why you are not taken seriously. I know EXACTLY why you don't take me seriously; because you reject the truth, that's why! No, because you reject your own responsibilities. I don't care one way or another about a loser like you. I am just helping you understand why nobody bothers to fight with you anymore and why your little dip**** newsgroup is nearly dead. Your question about where everyone went and why this group is completely dead was answered in your first response. Nobody ever realized that, Speak for yourself. I can speak for everyone with an IQ over 80 who has any sense of responsibility in this case. you all just seem desperate to convince people that you are not irresponsible AND that you should have no legal responsibility for your kids. However do you arrive at THAT conclusion? And by the way, how about leaving everybody else out of this. It is between you and ME. By reading your post where you said ... Why should I be responsible for my child .... I didn't have a choice blah blah blah. Nobody of my caliber spends much time here, this is a place for folks of your moral fiber who don't want responsibility for their children. That could not be further from the truth. This is a place for folks to EXPOSE the truth. Hurts, don't it. The truth is that you are and should be responsible for your own children. I am fine with the truth, it is you who seems desperatge to undo evolution. You begged for some attention No I didn't. Yes you did look at the title of your post. "Where did the people I hate go? Why won't they argue with me anymore?" pretty sad. You never thanked me for obliging though, you are rude as well as pathetic. And just what job am I searching for? [You seem to have a fixation on me the person rather than the topic at hand. Attacking the author instead of the argument only proves the folly of the opponent. Don't take MY word for it, google it.] The topic is you and your pathetic attempt to dredge up an argument in this dead newsgroup. I found it funny enough to play along with you. So don't think of this as an attack, just a description of your actions. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
" wrote in message ... Chris wrote: Then what is your excuse for this lame troll? Why are you so desperate to get the attention of people who consider you a useless pile of ****? I'm not. Then explain your trolling. I'm not trolling. Do you just like the negative attention? Do you miss the feminazis you dislike so much? Are you just incredibly stupid? You, you, you. Only problem is, it's NOT about me. Read the topic again, and perhaps you might learn this. Are you just lonely? No. Are YOU? See above. You are proclaiming EXACTLY that. You are claiming that you should not be responsible for your kids because it is not your choice. Not even CLOSE. With all due respect, is English your second language? You are either stupid or lying, False dilemma. So, was that a "yes" or a "no"? I don't care which. You are willing to lie Untrue. But I welcome you to prove that I do not believe my own claim. Done. Where's the proof? from one post to the next to try and make your silly point and you wonder why you are not taken seriously. I know EXACTLY why you don't take me seriously; because you reject the truth, that's why! No, because you reject your own responsibilities. Untrue. I don't care one way or another about a loser like you. I am just helping you understand why nobody bothers to fight with you anymore and why your little dip**** newsgroup is nearly dead. I would wager that it is "nearly dead" because fewer people are willing to help others extort money. Perhaps you can be a hero and soup it up again. Your question about where everyone went and why this group is completely dead was answered in your first response. Nobody ever realized that, Speak for yourself. I can speak for everyone with an IQ over 80 Not without their consent. Not to mention, who are YOU to determine one's IQ? who has any sense of responsibility in this case. you all just seem desperate to convince people that you are not irresponsible AND that you should have no legal responsibility for your kids. However do you arrive at THAT conclusion? And by the way, how about leaving everybody else out of this. It is between you and ME. By reading your post where you said ... Why should I be responsible for my child .... I didn't have a choice blah blah blah. Since your above premise is false, your conclusion simply cannot follow. In other words, I NEVER said that. Nobody of my caliber spends much time here, this is a place for folks of your moral fiber who don't want responsibility for their children. That could not be further from the truth. This is a place for folks to EXPOSE the truth. Hurts, don't it. The truth is that you are and should be responsible for your own children. When you say "you", exactly what do you mean in the above context? I am fine with the truth, Then why the resistance to it? it is you who seems desperatge to undo evolution. You begged for some attention No I didn't. Yes you did look at the title of your post. "Where did the people I hate go? Why won't they argue with me anymore?" pretty sad. With all due respect, ya gotta layoff that pipe. You never thanked me for obliging though, you are rude as well as pathetic. Thank you for your opinion. And just what job am I searching for? Again, what job am I searching for? [You seem to have a fixation on me the person rather than the topic at hand. Attacking the author instead of the argument only proves the folly of the opponent. Don't take MY word for it, google it.] The topic is you No it's not. and your pathetic attempt to dredge up an argument in this dead newsgroup. A question or statement does NOT make an arguement. It is the response that does so. You might want to review the concept. I found it funny enough to play along with you. So don't think of this as an attack, just a description of your actions. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
Chris wrote:
Then explain your trolling. I'm not trolling. Pointless posts made for the sole reason of getting people to argue with you is trolling. Do you just like the negative attention? Do you miss the feminazis you dislike so much? Are you just incredibly stupid? You, you, you. Only problem is, it's NOT about me. Read the topic again, and perhaps you might learn this. It is about you and your trolling for an argument. This group is so dead now that if I didn't post, your trolling would have been completely ignored. You are either stupid or lying, False dilemma. So, was that a "yes" or a "no"? Stick to the topic of your lame attempts to troll up an argument in a dead newsgroup. Untrue. But I welcome you to prove that I do not believe my own claim. Done. Where's the proof? In all of your posts. No, because you reject your own responsibilities. Untrue. My mistake, you WANT to reject your responsibility if only you could prove that they aren't yours. I would wager that it is "nearly dead" because fewer people are willing to help others extort money. Perhaps you can be a hero and soup it up again. You'd lose, it is dead because of single issue idiots like you posting ridiculous nonsense. Who would bother to take those posts seriously? I can speak for everyone with an IQ over 80 Not without their consent. Not to mention, who are YOU to determine one's IQ? I have their consent, they are all just thrilled that I am willing to do the dirty work and make fun of you so they can continue to ignore you. We had a meeting, of course you didn't know about it. Since your above premise is false, your conclusion simply cannot follow. In other words, I NEVER said that. read your own posts, maybe you were too drunk to remember posting it. The truth is that you are and should be responsible for your own children. When you say "you", exactly what do you mean in the above context? Everyone with children. Yes you did look at the title of your post. "Where did the people I hate go? Why won't they argue with me anymore?" pretty sad. With all due respect, ya gotta layoff that pipe. you don't even understand yourself, do you? What other reason did you have for asking for all the people who make fun of you? A question or statement does NOT make an arguement. It is the response that does so. You might want to review the concept. It was you begging for an argument, since the group is dead you need to troll a little just to get anyone to respond. That is and will remain the topic of my posts. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
" wrote in message ... Chris wrote: Then explain your trolling. I'm not trolling. Pointless posts made for the sole reason of getting people to argue with you is trolling. Since "pointless" is a matter of opinion, and in my opinion it was not pointless, per YOUR definition I was not trolling. Do you just like the negative attention? Do you miss the feminazis you dislike so much? Are you just incredibly stupid? You, you, you. Only problem is, it's NOT about me. Read the topic again, and perhaps you might learn this. It is about you Like I said, read the topic. As a matter of fact, how about quoting it, then explaining what part of it is about ME. and your trolling for an argument. This group is so dead now that if I didn't post, your trolling I was not trolling. would have been completely ignored. You are either stupid or lying, False dilemma. So, was that a "yes" or a "no"? Stick to the topic of your lame attempts to troll up an argument in a dead newsgroup. Again, was that a "yes" or a "no"? Untrue. But I welcome you to prove that I do not believe my own claim. Done. Where's the proof? In all of your posts. In all these posts, what, exactly, have I said that proves so? No, because you reject your own responsibilities. Untrue. My mistake, you WANT to reject your responsibility if only you could prove that they aren't yours. Mistake number TWO. Carefully read what you wrote above, and you just might see that it is a senseless statement. I would wager that it is "nearly dead" because fewer people are willing to help others extort money. Perhaps you can be a hero and soup it up again. You'd lose, Try me! it is dead because of single issue idiots like you posting ridiculous nonsense. Guess again. Who would bother to take those posts seriously? I can speak for everyone with an IQ over 80 Not without their consent. Not to mention, who are YOU to determine one's IQ? I have their consent, And how have you determined their IQs to be over 80? they are all just thrilled that I am willing to do the dirty work and make fun of you so they can continue to ignore you. We had a meeting, of course you didn't know about it. And this is relevant how? Since your above premise is false, your conclusion simply cannot follow. In other words, I NEVER said that. read your own posts, maybe you were too drunk to remember posting it. Enlighten me. The truth is that you are and should be responsible for your own children. When you say "you", exactly what do you mean in the above context? Everyone with children. Meaning biological parents, legal parents, physical guardians.... ? Will you be more specific? Yes you did look at the title of your post. "Where did the people I hate go? Why won't they argue with me anymore?" pretty sad. With all due respect, ya gotta layoff that pipe. you don't even understand yourself, do you? What other reason did you have for asking for all the people who make fun of you? Like I said, the pipe's killin' you...... A question or statement does NOT make an arguement. It is the response that does so. You might want to review the concept. It was you begging for an argument, Perhaps in YOUR opinion. Thanks for sharing. since the group is dead you need to troll a little just to get anyone to respond. I did not troll; therefore, your claim is false. That is and will remain the topic of my posts. Since I am the original poster, I, NOT you, set the topic of this discussion. Any attempt to change it is nothing more than a red herring. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
Chris wrote:
Pointless posts made for the sole reason of getting people to argue with you is trolling. Since "pointless" is a matter of opinion, and in my opinion it was not pointless, per YOUR definition I was not trolling. Right, your point was to get some attention and try to get an argument started in your dead newsgroup. That is trolling. It is about you Like I said, read the topic. As a matter of fact, how about quoting it, then explaining what part of it is about ME. The part where you posted asking where all the people you don't like were rather than just being happy that they ignore you now. The topic of this post is you and your lame trolling. I was not trolling. You were. As dense and unable to face facts as you are, even you can see that your post was just a troll to get people who ignore you to argue with you. Stick to the topic of your lame attempts to troll up an argument in a dead newsgroup. Again, was that a "yes" or a "no"? Was what? Your lame attempt to troll? In all these posts, what, exactly, have I said that proves so? the first trolling post in its entirety. My mistake, you WANT to reject your responsibility if only you could prove that they aren't yours. Mistake number TWO. Carefully read what you wrote above, and you just might see that it is a senseless statement. You can't even own up to the fact that you were trolling this dead newsgroup for an argument, honesty just isn't expected of you anymore. I would wager that it is "nearly dead" because fewer people are willing to help others extort money. Perhaps you can be a hero and soup it up again. You'd lose, Try me! So you are claiming that the regular posters in here were willing to help others extort money? Seems you can't read at all. Or else this is just another lame attempt to troll up an argument. And how have you determined their IQs to be over 80? I tested them they are all just thrilled that I am willing to do the dirty work and make fun of you so they can continue to ignore you. We had a meeting, of course you didn't know about it. And this is relevant how? As relevant as your attempt to troll, just establishing a baseline of your stupidity and inability to understand even the most basic things. read your own posts, maybe you were too drunk to remember posting it. Enlighten me. I'm not equipped to do that, you need a team of psychiatrists and a lawyer before anything will penetrate your dense skull. Meaning biological parents, legal parents, physical guardians.... ? Will you be more specific? No thanks, I'm just here to help you with your trolling, hopefully this uses up some of the time you normally spend neglecting your kids and annoying people in liquor stores. Its a public service I'm doing. It was you begging for an argument, Perhaps in YOUR opinion. Thanks for sharing. It was, and you're quite welcome. since the group is dead you need to troll a little just to get anyone to respond. I did not troll; therefore, your claim is false. Yes you did and I'm here to make sure you aren't completely ignored as you usually are. Maybe this good deed on my part will help you gain some confidence and by this time next year you won't be reduced to trolling in a dead newsgroup for negative attention. That is and will remain the topic of my posts. Since I am the original poster, I, NOT you, set the topic of this discussion. Any attempt to change it is nothing more than a red herring. It is you being a troll, you still don't know where all the feminazis went because everyone except me just ignored you like they usually do. You can thank me for making your troll a semi sucessful one. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
" wrote in message ... Chris wrote: Pointless posts made for the sole reason of getting people to argue with you is trolling. Since "pointless" is a matter of opinion, and in my opinion it was not pointless, per YOUR definition I was not trolling. Right, your point was to get some attention and try to get an argument started in your dead newsgroup. That is trolling. So you're saying that was the point of my post? It is about you Like I said, read the topic. As a matter of fact, how about quoting it, then explaining what part of it is about ME. The part where you posted asking where all the people you don't like I never did any such thing. Now produce QUOTES to back your claim. You DO know what quotes are, right? were rather than just being happy that they ignore you now. The topic of this post is you and your lame trolling. Support your claim. I was not trolling. You were. I was not. As dense and unable to face facts as you are, even you can see that your post was just a troll to get people who ignore you to argue with you. Sorry, I cannot see that which does NOT exist. Stick to the topic of your lame attempts to troll up an argument in a dead newsgroup. Again, was that a "yes" or a "no"? Was what? The answer to my question. Your lame attempt to troll? In all these posts, what, exactly, have I said that proves so? the first trolling post in its entirety. Ok, let's try it this way: How about quoting what I said that proves so. My mistake, you WANT to reject your responsibility if only you could prove that they aren't yours. Mistake number TWO. Carefully read what you wrote above, and you just might see that it is a senseless statement. You can't even own up to the fact I own up to any fact concerning my actions; and guess what, trolling AIN'T one of 'em. that you were trolling Untrue. this dead newsgroup for an argument, honesty just isn't expected of you anymore. I would wager that it is "nearly dead" because fewer people are willing to help others extort money. Perhaps you can be a hero and soup it up again. You'd lose, Try me! So you are claiming that the regular posters in here were willing to help others extort money? No. Seems you can't read at all. Or else this is just another lame attempt to troll up an argument. False dilemma. And how have you determined their IQs to be over 80? I tested them they are all just thrilled that I am willing to do the dirty work and make fun of you so they can continue to ignore you. We had a meeting, of course you didn't know about it. And this is relevant how? As relevant as your attempt to troll, Then that'd be about as relevant as the jewish Pope. just establishing a baseline of your stupidity and inability to understand even the most basic things. read your own posts, maybe you were too drunk to remember posting it. Enlighten me. I'm not equipped to do that, Nor is anybody else since it is IMPOSSIBLE to reproduce that which was never produced in the first place. you need a team of psychiatrists and a lawyer before anything will penetrate your dense skull. Meaning biological parents, legal parents, physical guardians.... ? Will you be more specific? No thanks, I see, it remains a mystery just who these folks are. I'm just here to help you with your trolling, hopefully this uses up some of the time you normally spend neglecting your kids and annoying people in liquor stores. Its a public service I'm doing. It was you begging for an argument, Perhaps in YOUR opinion. Thanks for sharing. It was, and you're quite welcome. since the group is dead you need to troll a little just to get anyone to respond. I did not troll; therefore, your claim is false. Yes you did No, I didn't. and I'm here to make sure you aren't completely ignored as you usually are. Maybe this good deed on my part will help you gain some confidence and by this time next year you won't be reduced to trolling in a dead newsgroup for negative attention. That is and will remain the topic of my posts. Since I am the original poster, I, NOT you, set the topic of this discussion. Any attempt to change it is nothing more than a red herring. It is you being a troll, Correction: I am not a troll. Now, care to address the topic? you still don't know where all the feminazis went I know EXACTLY where they went; they crawled back into their holes. because everyone except me just ignored you Untrue. like they usually do. You can thank me for making your troll Irrelevant since "your troll" does not exist AND is a red herring. a semi sucessful one. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
Chris wrote:
Right, your point was to get some attention and try to get an argument started in your dead newsgroup. That is trolling. So you're saying that was the point of my post? It is understandable, you need a place to regurgitate your mensrights.org blog articles and argue with people about them. Unfortunately for you nobody really cares anymore and that has become a bore. Even the whine choir who usually agrees with your regurgitations and swears to your lies doesn't bother to post anymore. I can see why you are trolling a dead newsgroup now with your Rush Limbaugh feminazis stupidity, you are desperate to drag someone back into your arguments and want to try and revive the newsgroup so when you cut and paste your nitwit articles there will be someone here who cares. Some times it is just best to let it go, nobody cares, the newsgroup is dead and no amount of trolling on your part will bring it back to life. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
" wrote in message ... Chris wrote: Right, your point was to get some attention and try to get an argument started in your dead newsgroup. That is trolling. So you're saying that was the point of my post? It is understandable, you need a place to regurgitate your mensrights.org blog articles and argue with people about them. Unfortunately for you nobody really cares anymore and that has become a bore. Even the whine choir who usually agrees with your regurgitations and swears to your lies doesn't bother to post anymore. I can see why you are trolling a dead newsgroup now with your Rush Limbaugh feminazis stupidity, you are desperate to drag someone back into your arguments and want to try and revive the newsgroup so when you cut and paste your nitwit articles there will be someone here who cares. Some times it is just best to let it go, nobody cares, the newsgroup is dead and no amount of trolling on your part will bring it back to life. I must admit, the above beats Daddy Dewdrop's version HANDS DOWN! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
" wrote in message
... [snip] Some times it is just best to let it go, nobody cares, the newsgroup is dead and no amount of trolling on your part will bring it back to life. Then why are -you- here?? Trolling, eh? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Where'd all the feminazis go?
Dusty wrote:
" wrote in message ... [snip] Some times it is just best to let it go, nobody cares, the newsgroup is dead and no amount of trolling on your part will bring it back to life. Then why are -you- here?? Trolling, eh? Look you finally have a friend to play with. Good for you 2, maybe now you can get back to the trolling for interest in your dead newsgroup. Good luck to you both, happy trolling. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
where'd everyone go? | Moon Shyne | Single Parents | 5 | January 30th 07 04:14 AM |
Steve Irwin, the feminazis' poster child | Chris | Child Support | 3 | September 5th 06 11:20 PM |
where'd she go? | xkatx | Single Parents | 1 | October 26th 05 04:01 PM |