The Big Lie Repeated Over & Over by the Vaccination Snake-oil Teams

On Mar 30, 11:06*pm, wrote:
On Mar 29, 11:36*am, Mark Probert wrote:





On Mar 28, 10:48*am, PeterB wrote:

On Mar 27, 11:56*pm, (DavidWright) wrote:

In article ,

PeterB wrote:
On Mar 27, 6:51*pm, Ilena Rose wrote:
Note from Ilena Rosenthal ... Health Lover.

Gardasil Shill, Myrl Jeffcoat, goes ballistic and shows how once
again, she will claim I said something I did not ... and then scream
and me for her hallucination. Misquoting is very Barrett-esque!

Watch this:
"Ilena - I have never said that DES is safe! *You are lying through
your teeth about my comments, and the spin you are putting on it! "
* Myrl Jeffcoat, March 27, 2008 4:02p.m.

~~~~~~~~~~

Myrl made this false claim about DES ...

" It believe it was used up until the late 1940s to prevent
miscarriage. " *Myrl Jeffcoat 3/27/2008

FACTS:

*Late 1960s: Six of the seven leading obstetrics textbooks stated that
DES had no effect in preventing miscarriage in any group of patients.
DES was still being prescribed to pregnant women and touted as a
"wonder drug."`

http://www.descancer.org/timeline.html

Myrl Jeffcoat is doing the identical hype and advertisement for
Gardasil as Eli Lilly did for DES ... and although she's been totally
exposed ... her most important 'work' is dessiminating negative and
false information about me.

The rest is just Myrl trying to distract you readers from the even
bigger lies she tells about vaccinations. *

~~~~~~~~~

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/myrl.html
"According to the CDC and most recognized sources, the year mercury
was removed from childhood vaccines was 2001."
* * * * * Myrl Jeffcoat March, 2008www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/myrl.html
Lies about Gardasil, DES, and Ilena Rosenthal

Myrl Jeffcoat is misquoting the CDC .. and lying to all readers. This
is ypical of her tactics since she began promoting the quackery of
Stephen Barrett & QuackWatch while *harassing me after they lost to me
in the Superior, Appeals and Suprme Court of California.

Here is a list of childhood vaccinations that still continue mercury.
Myrl and the Snake-oil (Vaccination) Team have been told this time and
time again, but they repeat their Big Lie.

http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/thi-table.htm

As recently as today, the Ides of March ... after Dr. Kulacz carefully
explained the dangers of thimerosal (mercury) ... up pops Wronger Than
Wright repeating the Big Lie:

"Absolutely correct. For example, the toxicity of mercury in very low
doses and the possible harm that it can do in the human body. Why put
mercury that is known to be so highly toxic into the human body?
The answer is sufficientyly obvious - it should NOT be done. " Dr..
Robert Kulacz

DavidC. Wright, pure and utter liar.
*"And now it's not being done any more, so why are people like you
*getting so exercised about it? "

http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/thi-table.htm

I'm not only aware of the existence of that table, I have posted the
URL many times.

The important thing is that the *only* vaccine on the list recommended
for children is the flu vaccine, and it's available thimerosal-free.
Anti-vax liars tend to omit these facts.

http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.or...er-than-Wright

I like the "DavidC. Wright" part; apparently, Ilena saw thatDavid
"Chris" Wright and didn't realize it was a joke. *'Course, she's not
that bright.

Davidhas been pushing "no-evidence" based medicine so long I think he
sees himself as anartist.

That makes no sense at all, but I don't expect much from you.

ie., no evidence = noscience.

Given that so many of the "facts" you like to post here were pulled
out of your imagination, I don't find your criticism weighing too
heavily on me.

Other than Roman Bystrianyk, no one here has posted more published
scientific evidence than I have. *You won't acknowledge that because
your "views" can't be supported outside mostly industry sources. *If
I'm wrong, list 8 books you've read this past year that back up your
so-called viewpoint.-

Any idiot can write a book and have it self published. Try to use peer
reviewed scientific literature.

You cannot.

I see that David cannot do as I asked and thus you are blocking for
him. *When did I say anything about material that is "self
published?" * All the books, except maybe one, on my reading list are
released by a publishing house. *Peer reviewed studies are not what I
asked about, either.

So let me put the question to you, Markey. *Can you list 8 books
you've read (regardless of time frame) that back up your so-called
viewpoint regarding the merits of modern medicine? * If not, why not


Simple, just for you...books are not the only place knowledge is
stored.

And, your point is utterly bull****, but, you would never understand
the reason.