Girl, 14, dies within hours of jab from malignant tumor

She died of a malignant tumor in her chest. The vaccine
had nothing to do with it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217280

"Mark Thorson" wrote in message
...
She died of a malignant tumor in her chest. The vaccine
had nothing to do with it.

So, when it suits your porpuse, a news artical is proof? Easy to fool it
seems.

Smarter Than You wrote:

"Mark Thorson" wrote in message
...
She died of a malignant tumor in her chest. The vaccine
had nothing to do with it.

So, when it suits your porpuse, a news artical is proof? Easy to fool it
seems.

It's not just inn one article -- lots of news
sources are carrying it.

However, here's a link to the UK's National Health Service
which states the facts well.

http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/09Septem...accine-QA.aspx

"Mark Thorson" wrote in message
...
Smarter Than You wrote:

"Mark Thorson" wrote in message
...
She died of a malignant tumor in her chest. The vaccine
had nothing to do with it.

So, when it suits your porpuse, a news artical is proof? Easy to fool it
seems.

It's not just inn one article -- lots of news
sources are carrying it.

However, here's a link to the UK's National Health Service
which states the facts well.

Why should I trust them to tell the truth about this? I mean for real, why?

In message , Mark Thorson wrote:

She died of a malignant tumor in her chest.

From which it presumably follows that vaccines cause
incomparably fast-growing cancers.

The vaccine
had nothing to do with it.

You're only saying that because Big Pharma is paying
you vast sums to post here.

--
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions -+