The F Crime: Has Chris Gupta (of Friends of Freedom) reported it?

THE F CRIME: HAS CHRIS GUPTA (OF FRIENDS OF FREEDOM) REPORTED IT?

CHRIS GUPTA (of Friends of Freedom, http://www.friendsoffreedom.org) wrote:

Dr. Gastaldo, not sure what to make of this? If you think this is a simple
matter, then I was wondering why you yourself have not proceeded with the
action you state? Obviously someone with your background (as stated in your
note) should make a quick win? And we should all be so grateful.
Chris Gupta ------------


(NEW READERS: The post to which Chris Gupta responded is reproduced below)

OPEN LETTER archived for global access, see below.

Chris,

You are pretending that I have not done what I myself recommend.

By copy of this post to Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers, I am (ONCE AGAIN)
doing what I myself recommend:

1) I am publicly reporting the massive crime of battery against children
(the mass water poisoning/mass child abuse) to law enforcement; and

2) I am publicly encouraging others to report the crime to law
enforcement...

Assuming you, too, suspect that the mass water poisoning is mass battery...

Have YOU publicly reported the mass water poisoning crime to law
enforcement?

Are you publicly encouraging others to do so?

Or - like Paul Connett, PhD - are you indirectly promoting the fluoride
polluters' fraudulent notion that people can VOTE to force medicate other
people?

FOR NEW READERS: Paul indirectly promotes the fraudulent notion that people
can vote to force medicate other people - by uncritically encouraging people
to vote against "fluoridation" - even as he announces election victories.

NOTE: I have NO problem with people VOTING the F out of the water - as long
as it is clearly noted that common law indicates that force medication is a
crime.

When one suspects (as Paul Connett does) that the mass water poisoning is
causing limb amputations in children, encouraging people to identify the
crime as child abuse and report it - becomes that much more important.

REMEMBER CHRIS: When ending a massive water-poisoning-child-abuse crime
thought to cause limb amputations, it is important for people to petition
TWO branches of government: the executive (law enforcement) branch of AND
the legislative branch. (If enough people report the crime, the executive
branch could end it immediately - and in the meantime legislative branches
would likely start more avidly voting to get the F out of the water.)

KEY POINT: As I've noted so many times, when child abuse is so much as
SUSPECTED, legislative branches MANDATE reports to executive branches from
mandatory reporters - and the State of Oregon encourages EVERYONE to report
(see quote below).

So Chris...

Have YOU reported the mass water poisoning child abuse?

Are you encouraging others to report it?

If not, why not?

REMEMBER: If the Harvard research is right, the mass water poisoning child
abuse is causing LIMB AMPUTATIONS in some children.

REMEMBER ALSO: Even if the F crime PREVENTED limb amputations - it would
still be illegal - because forcing people to take even good medicines is
illegal. (See THOR quoted below.)

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA


Copied to: Friends of Freedom via

PS1 Chris, if you don't suspect that the mass water poisoning is mass
battery (see the case laws I quoted), please explain.

PS2 NEW READERS: Here is the post to which Chris Gupta responded...




THE F CRIME: STUPIDITY TO DOCILITY * TO AGGRESSION

³It appears that the judicial use of this toxin [fluoride] can have many
effects all the way from Stupidity...docility to even aggression...²
--Chris Gupta (see full post below)

OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below)

Chris Gupta
Councilmember
Friends of Freedom
http://www.friendsoffreedom.org
Via
Also via:

Chris,

TWO FACTS...

1. It is a battery to force medicate * even if one force medicates with good
medicine (see THOR quoted below) * and battery against children is child
abuse.

2. Mandatory reporters MUST report child abuse when it is so much as
suspected. Everyone else is ENCOURAGED to report (in Oregon at least). See
below.

QUESTION ABOUT THE MASS WATER POISONING: Is it F-Crime-induced stupidity or
docility * or complicity in the F Crime * that keeps ³anti-fluoridationists²
from encouraging lawful (MANDATORY-for-some) acts of aggression (suspected
child abuse reports) to petition law enforcement to stop the mass poisoning of
children and others?

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA



PS The following is a substantial excerpt of a post criticizing Paul
Connett, PhD for failing to encourage reporting of the mass water poisoning
crime...

Paul Connett, PhD puts out much good info (like the quotes from the American
Dental Association/ADA below) * but he is failing to do something obvious...

THE F CRIME: WHY DENTISTS (BLINDLY) PROMOTE "FLUORIDATION"

FACT: "Fluoridation" in most cities is the injection of hazardous substances
from waste sites (FSA, arsenic and lead) into drinking water. (Some cities
use a "pharmaceutical grade" of the cumulative poison fluoride.)

If your dentist is promoting the mass water poisoning, here is the likely
reason why: He or she trusted dentists (or attorneys?) at the American
Dental Association/ADA who reportedly [according to Paul Connett, PhD] wrote
in 1979...

"Individual dentists must be convinced that they need not be familiar with
scientific reports of laboratory and field investigations on fluoridation to
be effective participants in the promotion program and that nonparticipation
is overt neglect of professional responsibility."

The American Dental Association/ADA reportedly (see below) said in 1995:

"The ADA owes no legal duty of care to protect the public from allegedly
dangerous products used by dentists..." Tolhurst v. J & J and ADA, Superior
Court, Santa Clara, CA. Case No. 718228, 1995.

NOTE: Even if "fluoridation"/injection of hazardous substances from waste
sites (FSA, arsenic and lead) into drinking water was GOOD medicine - it
would still be illegal. (As indicated above, some cities force medicate with
a "pharmaceutical grade" of the cumulative poison fluoride.)

FACT: Forced medication - even with good medicine - is a CRIME - battery.
See THOR quoted below.

THEREFORE...

Dentists are blindly urging elected officials and others to VOTE to commit
the crime of putting the poison into the water of people who don't want it
there - and elected officials and others are blindly going along with the
criminal water poisoning gag.

"Fluoridation" is OBVIOUS forced medication with a cumulative poison...

THOR

The California Supreme Court wrote in the 1993 case of Daniel Thor v.
The Superior Court of Solano County 93 C.D.O.S. 5658:

"The common law has long recognized this principle: *A physician who
performs any medical procedure without the patient's consent commits a
battery irrespective of the skill or care used." [Thor at 5659]

JUST THINK: Dentists are blindly urging elected officials and others to
commit a forced medication crime that physicians (and dentists) can get
prosecuted for...

In the US, most "fluoridation" is "unconsented touching" of people's insides
with hazardous substances from waste sites (FSA, lead and arsenic).

KEY POINT: EXPERT TESTIMONY IS NOT NEEDED to prosecute such a crime (at
least not in Missouri and probably not in most states), as in this Missouri
case law,

Wuerz v. Huffaker, 42 S.W.3d 652* (Mo.App. E.D. 2001)
THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI EASTERN DISTRICT
No. ED77427
2001.MO.0000030 http://www.versuslaw.com
January 23, 2001:

"In the absence of any consent, a physician is subject to liability for
battery....Baltzell, 752 S.W.2d at 906; Louisell & Williams, Sections 22.03,
8.06 (1998)."

"To establish battery based on lack of consent, a plaintiff is only required
to prove the occurrence of unconsented touching. Louisell & Williams,
Section 22.03."

"The sole question in such a case is whether the patient was informed of the
nature of the procedure and consented to it. Id. Thus, expert testimony is
not required..."
http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/con...v_Huffaker.htm

AGAIN: EXPERT TESTIMONY IS NOT NEEDED.

NOTE WELL...

When it is so much as SUSPECTED that children are having their water
poisoned...

When it is so much as suspected that children are having limbs amputated as
a consequence (one Harvard dentist is under investigation for covering up
the research)...

Penal law MANDATES that the crime be reported by mandated reporters
immediately.

The State of Oregon encourages reports from EVERYONE when child abuse is
Suspected (other states likely do the same)...

"ALL OREGON CITIZENS ARE ENCOURAGED TO REPORT SUSPECTED [CHILD ABUSE] TO DHS
OR LAW ENFORCEMENT. Over 25 percent of the substantiated cases of child
abuse are reported by concerned citizens who are not required to report.
Failure to report is a violation and carries a maximum penalty of $1,000.00.
Mandatory reporters have also been successfully sued for damages in civil
court for failing to report.©®¢
http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/children/a...s/report.shtml

Oddly, Paul Connett has so far refused to publicize just the fact that
common law indicates that the mass water poisoning is a crime.

Paul Connett has also refused to publicize the fact that poisoning
children's water is obvious child abuse - which is strange because...

Paul Connett likes to tell everyone about how babies who drink formula
reconstituted with poisoned water get as much as 100 times more of the
poison than breastfed babies. See www.fluoridealert.org.

Paul also likes to tell everyone about the Harvard dentistry professor who
apparently concealed the conclusion of one of his own graduate students who
demonstrated that boys who drink the poisoned water are at 700% greater risk
of limb amputation and death than boys who drink water that is not poisoned.
Again, see www.fluoridealert.org.

TRULY STRANGE: Paul Connett is failing to publicize the bizarre QUILES case
rubberstamped by the Florida Supreme Court.

According to QUILES, the mass water poisoning is not forced medication
because Florida cities are "fluoridating" FAUCETS - not bloodstreams!

I only found out about QUILES because Paul Connett fobbed me off on
(instantly had at the ready the email address for) the losing QUILES
attorney - Doug Balog - when I asked Paul why he wasn't publicizing the
criminal aspect of the mass water poisoning....

For details...

See The F Crime: The QUILES faucet fraud...
http://groups.google.com/group/
misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/b6568f6e51f9d395

When one suspects that crime is being committed and that boys are having
limbs amputated as a consequence...

One reports to law enforcement immediately (and urges mandatory reporters to
report)...

IT'S THE LAW.

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA


This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive.

Search http://groups.google.com for ³The F Crime: Stupidity to Docility * to
Aggression²



CHRIS GUPTA WROTE:

The following article yet again shows why Fluoride compounds are a the darling
of the drug industry http://www.mercola.com/2001/aug/18/fluoride_drugs.htm .
Hence one can find many drugs rife with fluorides. These include SSRI's
(selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors) all the way to some cholesterol
drugs such as Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, Celexa to Lipitor. It appears that the
judicial use of this toxin can have many effects all the way from
Stupidity...docility to even aggression...

Extracted from: Fluoride To Make Prisoners 'stupid & Docile
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri...ke_prisoners_s
tupid_docile.htm

"There is a medical problem that affects an estimated 40 percent of people in
developed world. It can cause symptoms that vary wildly from exhaustion to
killer heart disease, and everything in between. The majority of physicians
haven't a clue; they don't know how to diagnose it, they don't know about the
64 diseases it causes, and they don't know a safe and effective way to reverse
it. All but the most progressive doctors leave their patients in limbo."

Extracted from: Doctors Are Dangerous http://www.doctorsaredangerous.com/

These medical problems stem form thyroid dysfunction for which we have the
clueless and pig headed Fluoridationists to blame. Who usurp any attempts to
remove this damaging substance form our drinking water.

"The NRC also reported on pages 231 and 236 that fluoride can ³stimulate
secretion of acid in the stomachŠreduce blood flow away from the stomach
liningŠdilate blood vesselsŠincrease redness of the stomach liningŠand cause
cell death and desquamation of the GI tract epithelium.² "

Impairing the digestive track
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri..._to_cure_ibs.h
tm is a sure way to ill health as the inability to absorb vital nutrients is
the primary cause for disease. The so called authorities continually behave as
though we have deficiency of their toxic drugs and the nutrients are just
incidental! These are very serious issues and we need to take the fluoride
promoters to task as per:

To All Anti-Public Water Fluoridationists In Canada
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri...lic_water_fluo
ridationists_in_canada.htm

Not all Fluoride compounds are same. Silicofluorides primarily used in nearly
all mass medication through our water systems
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri..._violation_of_
medical_ethics_and_human_right.htm is even more harmful and will be the
subject of a later post.

Chris Gupta
http://tinyurl.com/jehyy

http://tinyurl.com/jehyy See also: Questions For Water Fluoridation
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chri...water_fluorida
tion.htm
---------------------------

Fluoride Levels Too High - National Academies
(What the Press Release Did Not Mention)

Copyright 2006 by Mary Sparrowdancer

March 26, 2006 - In what many are regarding as a first step in the
long-awaited correction of a 60-year old nationwide medical mistake, a study
by the National Academies¹ National Research Council (NRC), sponsored by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has found that the current maximum
levels of fluoride allowed by the EPA in drinking water should be lowered due
to concerns over adverse health effects. The current maximum contaminant level
of fluoride is 4 mg/L and the secondary maximum contaminant level is 2 mg/L.
The NRC found that these levels are too high, ³not protective² of the
population and the Council urged further studies.

Although the press release of this fluoride report states, ³The report does
not examine the health risks or benefits of the artificially fluoridated water
that millions of Americans drinkŠ² the 576-page report cites numerous studies
that describe adverse health effects associated with water fluoridation, and
after reviewing this evidence, the committee concluded unanimously that the
maximum contaminant level of fluoride in drinking water should be lowered. (1,
2)

The press release makes reference to tooth enamel discoloration as a side
effect of excessive fluoride consumption, a risk factor for bone fractures and
possibly bone cancer. Again, however, the 576-page report contains numerous
studies showing an association between fluoride ingestion and a variety of
other health problems that are now prevalent and widespread in The United
States, where now two-thirds of the people are exposed to fluoridated drinking
water. Among those now-prevalent conditions found in Americans of all
backgrounds, are thyroid malfunction and GI problems.

Numerous studies are reviewed in the NRC report that indicate subclinical or
malfunctioning thyroid is ³associated with increased cholesterol
concentrations, increased incidence of depression, diminished response to
standard psychiatric treatment, cognitive dysfunction, and in pregnant women,
decreased IQ of their offspring.² (Page 198.) Additionally, their study
reveals that a number of authors have reported enamel disorders in juveniles
suffering from hypothyroidism. Yet, the possibility that dental fluorosis
might actually be late-appearing signs of thyroid fluorosis and malfunction
has not yet been studied in this country.

The NRC also reported on pages 231 and 236 that fluoride can ³stimulate
secretion of acid in the stomachŠreduce blood flow away from the stomach
liningŠdilate blood vesselsŠincrease redness of the stomach liningŠand cause
cell death and desquamation of the GI tract epithelium.²

In referencing a 1961 study pertaining to GI complaints, the NRC tentatively
states on page 230, ³Perhaps it is safe to say that less than 1% of the
population complains of GI symptoms after fluoridation is initiated (Feltman
and Kosel, 1961).² The ³less than 1%² figure based on the 1961 Feltman and
Kosel report does not seem reasonable at the present, however, because we have
new and better evidence than in the past of widespread gastric problems
including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and acid reflux.

A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, published in a 1997
issue of Gastroenterology also decried a lack of available data on GERD.
³Gastroesophageal reflux is considered a common condition, but detailed
population-based data on reflux in the United States are lacking.² The
findings of their study in Olmsted were, ³The prevalence per 100 of heartburn
and/or acid regurgitation experienced at least weekly was 19.8.² Olmsted
County was fluoridated 1959, and according to the CDC¹s records, most of
Olmsted is now fluoridated at 1.20 mg/L. (3, 4, 5,)

The IMS Health¹s list of top ranking pharmaceuticals sales for 2005 also
indicates a much greater prevalence of national GI problems. Two drugs that
decrease stomach acid, Prevacid and Nexium, were among the top ten
bestsellers, with sales for the combined products totaling 9.7 billion US
dollars during 2005. The top seller for 2005 according to this report was
Lipitor, a cholesterol-lowering agent, with sales of 12.9 billion US dollars.
(6)

According to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists,
approximately 27,000,000 Americans have thyroid disorders, but only about half
of them are aware of it. In the RxList website¹s, ³Top 300 Prescriptions for
2004 by Number of US Prescriptions Dispensed,² Synthroid, a thyroid drug, is
ranked as the fifth most popular prescription, with a total of 44,056,176
prescriptions dispensed during that year. Lipitor, had the second highest
number of prescriptions dispensed, at 69,766,431. The NRC states on Page 2 of
their report that in 2000, there were approximately 162,000,000 people
receiving water artificially fluoridated at levels of 0.7 to 1.2 mg/L. (7, 8)

One report studied by the NRC on page 194 showed ³statistically significant
changes in TSH concentrations (increased), T3 concentrations (decreased),²
following ³prolonged consumption of Œhigh-fluoride,¹² at 2.3 mg/L. On page
195, another study examined children in a high fluoride and low iodine area.
The ³high² fluoride level in this study was ³0.88 mg/L.² The children were
found to have a ³lower mean IQ,² as well as deviations in TSH and T3 levels.
An additional study by Susheela et al. (2005), found ³well-defined hormonal
derangements² in children with fluorosis from drinking water with ³1.1 - 14.3
mg/L² fluoride. On page 196, the NRC states that ³studies showing no effect of
fluoride on thyroid function did not measure actual hormone concentrationsŠdid
not report iodine intakes,² and used lower fluoride doses than other studies.

³Thus,² NRC stated on page 197, ³several lines of information² were reviewed
that indicated fluoride exposure had an effect on thyroid function. The
effects included decreased production of thyroid hormone, disruption of
conversion of T4 to T3, and effects on blood transport - the details of which
remain unclear. Also mentioned was the fact that some studies were not
available in English.

The historic impact of this extraordinary report is immeasurable. I contacted
Dr. Hardy Limeback - BSc, PhD, DDS, Associate Professor and Head of Preventive
Dentistry, University of Toronto - one of the twelve members of the NRC who
had co-authored the report. I asked if there were any comments he might have.

His reply was, ³I, for one, would look at the graph at the top of page194 and
ask, ŒAre undernourished black children in fluoridated cities (1 ppm) more
susceptible to thyroid problems than those living in non-fluoridated cities,
as that graph might suggest?¹ Perhaps. As far as I know, we have no data for
this problem in North America.²

Perhaps, indeed, this might explain the pandemic of obesity and type-2
diabetes seen in low-income, ethnic neighborhoods in the United States.

Since current recommendations suggest that babies up to six months of age
receive no fluoride at all, Dr. Luise Light, former USDA Director of Dietary
Guidance and Nutrition Education, proposed other questions that concerned
parents should now ask: ³How do we avoid giving babies fluoridated water if
it¹s in our municipal water systems? Does this mean we have to buy special
water to make our babies¹ food and drinks? And what about the water we bathe
them in?²

Because the EPA has now been advised of the potentially adverse effects
fluoride has on the entire body when administered systemically in unknowable
doses via drinking water, it would be in the interest of this nation if
diligent members of the EPA would now locate and have translated the extensive
German studies dating back to the 1930s. That was when German scientists
discovered that fluorides could be used as an effective agent to block thyroid
function in patients suffering from overactive thyroids. Of particular
national interest would be translations of the German studies in which
hundreds of patients with overactive thyroids had their thyroid function
blocked by being bathed in fluoridated water.

The EPA should call for an immediate moratorium on water fluoridation until
scientists and healthcare professionals can determine - at last - what the
true health impacts have been and will continue to be as a result of
fluoridating a nation of people through their drinking water.

--------------------------------------
Mary Sparrowdancer is the author of The Love Song of the Universe, (2001,
Hampton Roads), and is a science and health writer with training in clinical
laboratory sciences, including bacteriology, electroencephalography,
hematology and microscopic evaluation. www.sparrowdancer.com

http://www.sparrowdancer.com/ Mary co-authors a health newsletter with Dr.
Luise Light, author of ³What to Eat,² (2006, McGraw-Hill). Luise is former
USDA Director of Dietary Guidance and Nutrition Education, and was the creator
of the real fruit and vegetable Food Pyramid.
www.luiselight.com http://www.luiselight.com/
------------------------------
References

1. National Academies Press - ³Fluoride in Drinking Water,² Full Report. Table
of Contents. March 2006 http://darwin.nap.edu/books/030910128X/html/

2. News Release - National Academies - ³EPA Standard for Fluoride in Drinking
Water Is Not Protective; Tooth Enamel Loss, Bone Fractures of Concern at High
Levels² March 2006
http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/030910128X?OpenDocument

3. Medscape - Gastroenterology, 1997, ³Prevalence and clinical spectrum of
gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County,
Minnesota.² March 2006. http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/9136821

4. Rochester, MN - Olmstead Fluoridation record: 1959. March 2006.
https://www.rochestermn.gov/departments/attorney/ordinances/pdf/ORD140.pdf

5. CDC - My Water¹s Fluoride, Olmstead County. March 2006.
http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/MWF/SearchResultsV.asp

6. IMS Health - ³Leading Products by Global Pharmaceutical Sales, 2005² -
March 2006
http://www.imshealth.com/ims/portal/...77478579_77479
663,00.html

7. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists - ³Thyroid Awareness
Month, 2003.² March 2006 http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/cgi-bin/
http://www.aace.com/public/awareness/tam/2003/facts.php

8. RxList - Internet Drug Index - ³The Top 300 Prescriptions for 2004 by
Number of US Prescriptions Dispensed.² March 2006
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/cgi-bin/ http://www.rxlist.com/top200.htm

GERMAN TRANSLATIONS http://www.bruha.com/pfpc/html/thyroid_history.html
9. Schuld, Andreas, Parents of Fluoride Poisoned Children -
A. ³History of Fluoride² - ³Around the same time (1932) Gorlitzer von Mundy,
being aware that fluorides also get absorbed through the skin, began fluoride
treatments of hyperthyroid patients in Austria by prescribing 20 minute baths
containing 30ccm (0.03l) HF per 200 liters of water. He reported on his
successful treatment spanning over 30 years and involving over 600 patients at
a 1962 symposium on fluoride toxicityŠin Bern, also attended by other
world-leading experts includingŠGeorge Waldbott.²
B. Gorlitzer von Mundy V - "Ein neuer Weg zur Behandlung der Thyreotoxikose
mit Fluorwasserstoffsäure" Med Klin 21:&17-719 (1932)
(reports on the first successful use of baths containing HF in the treatment
of hyperthyroidism)
C. Gautier - Bull Soc Chim 14:241 (1914); cited in: Kraft K -³Beiträge zur
Biochemie des Fluors I.Über den Antagonismus zwischen Fluor und Thyroxin.²
Hoppe-Seglers Z.Physiol. Chem 245:58 -65 (1937)
D. May W - "Behandlung der Hypothyreosen einschließlich des schweren genuinen
Morbus Basedow mit Fluor" Klin Wochenschr 16:562-564 (1937) March 2006
Schuld, Andreas, PFPC

10. Meiers, Peter - (Historian) - http://www.fluoride-history.de/
A. ³Guenther Schiemann, Wolfgang Winkelmueller, Wilhelm Roselius: ŒVerfahren
zur Darstellung von Kondensationsprodukten kernfluorierter Arylaldehyde¹,
German Patent DE 621,862; filed July 1, 1932; pat. Nov. 14, 1935.² - Patent
for fluoride medication used to treat hyperthyroidism.
B. Kurt Kraft, Ferdinand Dengel: ³Verfahren zur Herstellung kernsubstituierter
Phenylessigsäuren,² German Patent DE 819,696; filed Feb. 3, 1943; pat. Nov. 5,
1951 (A compound similar to fluorotyrosine, i.e.
3-Fluoro-4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, was patented by Kraft and Dengel of
Knoll, pharmaceutical company of Ludwigshafen, and became known under the
names of ³Capacin,² ³Kapacin,² and ³Wiflucin² [marketed by Knoll] as a
treatment against hyperthyroidism. - s.a. The Merck Index, 9th edition, Merck
& Co., Rahway, N.J., 1976) March 2006
Meiers, Peter


To subscribe / unsubscribe:

List information is at: http://tinyurl.com/2xohw
ARCHIVES: http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/archives.htm
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/archives.htm Share The Wealth:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/
Communication Agents: http://www.communicationagents.com/
Council Member: Friends of Freedom - http://www.friendsoffreedom.org
http://www.friendsoffreedom.org/

END CHRIS GUPTA¹S POST

I say again:

JUST THINK: Dentists are blindly urging elected officials and others to
commit a forced medication crime that physicians (and dentists) can get
prosecuted for...

In the US, most "fluoridation" is "unconsented touching" of people's insides
with hazardous substances from waste sites (FSA, lead and arsenic).

KEY POINT: EXPERT TESTIMONY IS NOT NEEDED to prosecute such a crime (at
least not in Missouri and probably not in most states), as in this Missouri
case law,

Wuerz v. Huffaker, 42 S.W.3d 652* (Mo.App. E.D. 2001)
THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI EASTERN DISTRICT
No. ED77427
2001.MO.0000030 http://www.versuslaw.com
January 23, 2001:

"In the absence of any consent, a physician is subject to liability for
battery....Baltzell, 752 S.W.2d at 906; Louisell & Williams, Sections 22.03,
8.06 (1998)."

"To establish battery based on lack of consent, a plaintiff is only required
to prove the occurrence of unconsented touching. Louisell & Williams,
Section 22.03."

"The sole question in such a case is whether the patient was informed of the
nature of the procedure and consented to it. Id. Thus, expert testimony is
not required..."
http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/con...v_Huffaker.htm

AGAIN: EXPERT TESTIMONY IS NOT NEEDED.

NOTE WELL...

When it is so much as SUSPECTED that children are having their water
poisoned...

When it is so much as suspected that children are having limbs amputated as
a consequence (one Harvard dentist is under investigation for covering up
the research)...

Penal law MANDATES that the crime be reported by mandated reporters
immediately.

The State of Oregon encourages reports from EVERYONE when child abuse is
Suspected (other states likely do the same)...

"ALL OREGON CITIZENS ARE ENCOURAGED TO REPORT SUSPECTED [CHILD ABUSE] TO DHS
OR LAW ENFORCEMENT. Over 25 percent of the substantiated cases of child
abuse are reported by concerned citizens who are not required to report.
Failure to report is a violation and carries a maximum penalty of $1,000.00.
Mandatory reporters have also been successfully sued for damages in civil
court for failing to report.©®¢
http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/children/a...s/report.shtml

QUESTION: Is it F-Crime-induced stupidity or docility * or complicity in
the F Crime * that keeps ³anti-fluoridationists² from encouraging lawful
(MANDATORY-for-some) acts of aggression (suspected child abuse reports) to
petition law enforcement to stop the mass poisoning of children and others?

Again, thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA


This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive.

Search http://groups.google.com for ³The F Crime: Stupidity to Docility * to
Aggression²