James Watson's Ordeal & The Left Control Of Discourse.

"Way Back Jack" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:57:53 -0500, Bob LeChevalier
wrote:

(Way Back Jack) wrote:
Yeah, the administration tripped over its dicks to apologize when no
apology was necessary

The apology was for failing to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully
executed".

I don't recall Nagin or the La. Gov. apologizing.

Then it is up to the voters to respond.

Yeah, blacks are going to criticize a black liberal mayor. He's their
hero, even after the fact; despite having been warned the previous yr.
about the risk of a catastrophic storm

Not that any of this has to do with Gulfport.

I recall the empty school buses in NO, waiting to take people out, but
the dummies who live there expect Uncle Sugar & the Fed. Govt. to wave
a magic wand and make everything all right.

Gulfport is doing just fine and dandy, compared to the morons in NOLA. I
was there a year after the storm.
NOLA has always been a freaking loonie bin. Where else do they hold a
giant party where the cops stand on the corner smoking joints and drinking
beer; or the catholic priests get half-naked and go out looking for a good
time? BTDT.

The racist didn't receive adequate parental guidance.

The racist is prone to criminality.

The racist isn't competent, and isn't trustworthy.

Those who are competent don't need to fear others.

The racist senses, albeit only dimly, his inferiority.

That feeling of humiliation drives the racist to
a state of being untrustworthy.

"The followers must feel humiliated by their enemies: by shifting of rhetorical focus, the
enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak ..."

http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14_pts_2.htm


Racists are also prone to criminality and other failures.

http://www.fatdawg.com/subtleracism.html

"Why do racists have low IQs?"

http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/sayar/riqs.htm

On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:45:06 GMT, (Way Back Jack) wrote:

Fond ...

You're far-too fond of your own failures.

On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:59:58 -0600, Dopeass wrote:

crime rates ...

There are black populations with lower crime
rates than mixed populations.

Just another pesky fact that disproves the
myth-based belief of the inferior racist.

Notice the utter incapacity of the inferior
racist to dispute the facts.


The racist isn't up for reasoning.


Obviously, he isn't up for a web search, either,
or he'd have located "Barbados".

He couldn't even read that for comprehension.

The racist is truly inferior.

He proves it every day, on command.

No wonder he's so vulnerable to feeling humiliated.

Oliver Cromwell wrote:

On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:12:02 -0800, "R. Steve Walz" wrote:

Oliver Cromwell wrote:

Sub Saharan Africa is ruled by rascist bigots. Witness Robert
Mugabe and his African veterans. Blacks who have never fought
in any war to entitle themselves to the epithet veteran. This band
of vandals destroyed farms and drove out the white African farmers
who had been the mainstay of Zimbabwe's economy.
[]
Oh, I should have asked, you were referring to the black African
community, weren't you?
-----------------------------
No. While Mugabe is an ass, the feeling of Africans against the
invasion and occupation and colonialization of their countries
by whites totally justifies their actions, and even if it results
in dire poverty, the kind of freedom they seek is preferable to
wealth and slavery to whites.
Steve

What a stupid reaction. Better free and dying of hunger than being
fed with improving education and health under a beign white
authority.
------------------
Except enslavers aren't "benign".
It is better to be free and destitute than to be a well-fed slave.


I watched a program tonight about the British being driven out of
Aden. When I visited Aden in early 1963 it was a haven of free trade
and prosperity; although the store keeper did try and cheat me.
That is a clue to the mentality of the populace. After driving out the
British the communist rulers (with strong support from the Soviets)
nationalized all private properts (state theft, of course, by any other
name). Then they joined up with the Northern states and then the
standard of living truly crashed. Today several wrere asked if they
would welcome back the Brits - yes, please was the response.
------------------------
Welcoming rich conquerors back is always the reflex of ignorant old
women and pussies.

The only reasons small communisms have a hard time economically is
because the rest of the rich in the world won't trade with them if
they won't be their slaves. Support Communist revolution, it is the
ONLY hope of your children not being slave-drones with bombs in their
chests.


Freedom is a concept, it does not feed bellies or educate your kids,
nor does it pay for health care.
---------------------
And here I thought you were in favor of freedom, obviously you are not!
You obviously want to be a slave. Or is it that you want the rest of
us to be YOUR slave?


The more restrictive the ruling regime the lower the standard of
living. This pattern is easifly seen all around the world.
-----------------------
That's what the rich enslavers of the world want you to believe, which
is why they try to make an example of every nation which tries to escape
their grasp. Actually Communism is FAR more economically effective and
efficient than any Capitalist scheme, because Capitalism funnels part
of the generated wealth solely to the rich for NO WORK ON THEIR PART!
This depletes the wealth available to the common person.

In the USA fully HALF of ALL wealth is stolen in this manner!

You were all born equal on this planet, so why didn't you inherit your
share of it at your birth?? Why do you pay rent or mortgage to anyone?

Kill and eat the rich!

Or cripple them and make them work in factories assembling consumer
goods or else STARVE!
Steve

foolsrushin. wrote:

On 1 Nov, 04:02, "R. Steve Walz" wrote:
.................................................. ...............................................
Way Back Jack wrote:
snip
--------------------------------
You're misinterpreting him. He demolished attempts to classify humans
into "races" by skin-color or regional affiliation.

'the work of Cavalli-Sforza "challenges the assumption that there are
significant genetic differences between human races, and indeed, the
idea that 'race' has any useful biological meaning at all." (The Human
Genome Survey, 1 July 2000, pg. 11)'

There are differences in IQ, though. What would your reaction be, if
the distrubition of IQ seemed 'unfair' to this or that group, whoever,
whatever, wherever ... ?
--
'foolsrushin.'
------------------------------------
If IQ is unfair, it should be equalized by education. It's a result
of defective education to the unlucky, not genetics.
Steve

Way Back Jack wrote:

Statistics Suggest Race Not a Factor in Katrina Deaths
By Nathan Burchfiel
(CNSNews.com) - Statistics released by the Louisiana Department of
Health and Hospitals suggest that fewer than half of the victims of
Hurricane Katrina were black, and that whites died at the highest rate
of all races in New Orleans.
----------------------
If the population was mostly white, that isn't at all surprising!

You're an idiot. And CNS is Christian (Bigot) News Service.
Steve

Way Back Jack wrote:

Katrina, lies and videotape
By Star Parker
Monday, August 28, 2006

Spike Lee took his cameras and crew to New Orleans to film a
documentary about Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath. The four-hour
production, which aired on HBO, is, unfortunately, about as
destructive as was the disaster it depicts.

At a time when we need light and understanding, Lee has delivered
darkness, anger and hatred. Those who will be hurt the most by the
-------------------------------
All Lee did was report the darkness, anger, and hate displayed in
ignoring the black neighborhoods that were drowning. You know full
well that a batallion of air cavalry with helicopters would have been
out there in hours if they'd been white!
Steve

Way Back Jack wrote:

I don't recall Nagin or the La. Gov. apologizing.
------------------
I don't recall them having reason to.
Steve

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:04:39 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
wrote:


All Lee did.

All the pedophile did was a ignore the article.

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:01:34 -0800, "R. Steve Walz"
wrote:

Way Back Jack wrote:

Statistics Suggest Race Not a Factor in Katrina Deaths
By Nathan Burchfiel
(CNSNews.com) - Statistics released by the Louisiana Department of
Health and Hospitals suggest that fewer than half of the victims of
Hurricane Katrina were black, and that whites died at the highest rate
of all races in New Orleans.
----------------------
If the population was mostly white, that isn't at all surprising!

You're an idiot. And CNS is Christian (Bigot) News Service.
Steve

Looks like the pedophile didn't read the article.

Add this to your glass of black whine when you pay Jamaal reparations
for raping your JAP:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucjl/2006010...atrinaanalysis


MEDIA STILL OVERPLAYING RACE CARD IN KATRINA ANALYSIS


Did New Orleans blacks die at a higher rate than whites in the wake of
Hurricane Katrina? On the evidence so far, the answer is no. Of the
1,100 bodies recovered in Louisiana after Katrina, 836 were found in
New Orleans, and the state has released data on 568 of those that were
judged to be storm-related. As of last week, blacks, who were 67.2
percent of the pre-storm population of New Orleans, account for 50.9
percent of the city victims so far identified by race. It was New
Orleans whites who died way out of proportion to their numbers: 28
percent of the population, 45.6 percent of the city's known Katrina
deaths by race.

(...)

UPDATE:

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:58:43 -0800, "R. Steve Walz" wrote:

foolsrushin. wrote:

On 1 Nov, 04:02, "R. Steve Walz" wrote:
.................................................. ...............................................
Way Back Jack wrote:
snip
--------------------------------
You're misinterpreting him. He demolished attempts to classify humans
into "races" by skin-color or regional affiliation.

'the work of Cavalli-Sforza "challenges the assumption that there are
significant genetic differences between human races, and indeed, the
idea that 'race' has any useful biological meaning at all." (The Human
Genome Survey, 1 July 2000, pg. 11)'

There are differences in IQ, though. What would your reaction be, if
the distrubition of IQ seemed 'unfair' to this or that group, whoever,
whatever, wherever ... ?
--
'foolsrushin.'
------------------------------------
If IQ is unfair, it should be equalized by education. It's a result
of defective education to the unlucky, not genetics.
Steve

That's dumb. It is an absurdity to suggest that any child regardless of
IQ can be educated up to, say, doctorate level. Some children are more
talented than others. Some are good at sports, some are good at maths,
etc.

The best way to judge if there are major differences between races is to
make comparisons between groups with a similar education and see how
far each has progressed.

A (very) quick test for mental ability/agility is to see how many chess
grandmasters each race has produced. You will find Jews are
predominant, followed by a broad mixture of caucasians of different
nationalities. So far as I know there has never yet been a negro
chess grandmaster. Notice I did not say black, because there have
been dark skinned Asian Grandmasters. Education is not necessarily
any advantage here. Bobby Fischer was not especially well
educated, but he is considered by some to have been the greatest
chess player in history.

Of course some may argue that chess may be a prejudicial test for
some reason. Maybe, but in that case let's look at the number of Nobel
prizes offered for Chemistry or Physics. How many Negro mathematicians
are there in universities around the world. How many negro captain's of
industry are there?

Of course the excuse is they have suffered a lower standard of education.
But so have many caucasians who have nevertheless overcome their poor
standard of education (a la Bobby Fischer).

BTW, the initial results of comparing the differences between
chromosomes of different peoples was flawed due to the lack
of resolution in the results. Nowadays it is being found that
there are very significant differences between individuals even
within the same family, let alone the far larger differences
between strangers and especially people of a different race.