The California Numbers are NOT Going Down!-Evidence of NO HARM!

http://www.kevinleitch.co.uk/wp/index.php?p=409

"In short, CDDS numbers continue to rise in the age group that would
show a dramatic drop if thiomersal was the culprit."

http://autismnaturalvariation.blogsp...-kirby-do.html

Back in November, 2005, David Kirby had a discussion with Citizen Cain
about the correct interpretation of the California DDS numbers. Citizen
Cain explained that 'entries' or 'new cases' and 'net gain' are not the
same thing. To avoid confusion, Citizen Cain proposed using the 3-5
cohort caseload as a gauge of incidence. Clearly, any incidence drops
should reflect quickly in that cohort. David Kirby apparently understood
Citizen Cain's analysis and finally agreed to the following:


If the total number of 3-5 year olds in the California DDS system has
not declined by 2007, that would deal a severe blow to the
autism-thimerosal hypothesis.

Why is David Kirby silent?

"Mark Probert" wrote in message
...
http://www.kevinleitch.co.uk/wp/index.php?p=409

"In short, CDDS numbers continue to rise in the age group that would show
a dramatic drop if thiomersal was the culprit."

http://autismnaturalvariation.blogsp...-kirby-do.html

Back in November, 2005, David Kirby had a discussion with Citizen Cain
about the correct interpretation of the California DDS numbers. Citizen
Cain explained that 'entries' or 'new cases' and 'net gain' are not the
same thing. To avoid confusion, Citizen Cain proposed using the 3-5 cohort
caseload as a gauge of incidence. Clearly, any incidence drops should
reflect quickly in that cohort. David Kirby apparently understood Citizen
Cain's analysis and finally agreed to the following:


If the total number of 3-5 year olds in the California DDS system has not
declined by 2007, that would deal a severe blow to the autism-thimerosal
hypothesis.

Why is David Kirby silent?

Fact: He isn't.

http://www.evidenceofharm.com/

Speaking Engagements.



August 15 & 19th.

NY.coming