If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert
Click message tab, then block sender
Life if much nicer not having to read his nasty drivel, same with Wright, in fact not sure if he even posts anymore, such is its effectiveness, as surely he does and probert can't even delete all the unecessary text |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert
JOHN wrote:
Click message tab, then block sender Life if much nicer not having to read his nasty drivel, same with Wright, in fact not sure if he even posts anymore, such is its effectiveness, as surely he does and probert can't even delete all the unecessary text Short form: "NA NA NA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!!!" -- | The brighter the stupid burns, the more | | chance that someone will see the light. | +- D. C. Sessions -+ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert
JOHN wrote:
Click message tab, then block sender Life if much nicer not having to read his nasty drivel, same with Wright, in fact not sure if he even posts anymore, such is its effectiveness, as surely he does and probert can't even delete all the unecessary text OMG !!! You just violated a basic Usenet rule: DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS!!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Probert
In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a
Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner. 92-02731 SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT 183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747 November 9, 1992, Decided PRIOR HISTORY: [***1] Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S. Probert. DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further, HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred. COUNSEL: Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for petitioner. JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur. Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further, Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further, Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further, Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent, Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law. OPINIONBY: Per Curiam. OPINION: [*282] [**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4, 1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee. [**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992. The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the default motion. The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of professional misconduct. The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately Source: NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT Currency Status: ARCHIVE RECORD NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION Name: MARK PROBERT Date Of Birth: 11/XX/1946 Gender: MALE Address: 1698 WEBSTER AVE MERRICK, NY 11566 County: NASSAU Phone: 516-968-5572 EMPLOYER INFORMATION Employer: MARK S PROBERT ESQ Organization: PERSON LICENSING INFORMATION Licensing Agency: NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION License/Certification Type: ATTORNEY License Number: 1253889 Issue Date: 00/00/1978 License Status: DISBARRED License State: NY From: Mark Probert - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 11 2001 4:17 pm Email: Mark Probert Groups: k12.chat.teacher Noah has had one since 11/26/96 (my birthday). http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/P...stProbert.html http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/SandraProbert.htm http://humanticsfoundation.com/Disin...berttheCowward Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant From: (AloysiousX) Date: 07 Jan 2004 18:59:31 GMT Local: Wed, Jan 7 2004 2:59 pm Subject: A New Year's Resolution I have no children, Sistah Jan. As Salaam Aleikum, my Sistah! AloysiousX Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant From: (AloysiousX) Date: 06 Jan 2004 22:31:39 GMT Local: Tues, Jan 6 2004 6:31 pm Subject: A New Year's Resolution You know something, Sistah Ilena, I'm not Mark Probert, but it's pretty clear who the coward is. Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant From: (AloysiousX) Date: 07 Jan 2004 18:57:50 GMT Local: Wed, Jan 7 2004 2:57 pm Subject: A New Year's Resolution Sistah Jan, I'd never heard of you until you made your post in the breast implant group, much in the same way I'd never heard of Mark Probert until Sistah Ilena mentioned him. path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.da llas1.level3.net!news.lev**el3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!washdc3-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!ngpeer.n*e*ws.aol.com! audrey-m2.news.aol.com!not-for-mail Lines: 107 X-Admin: From: (AloysiousX) Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant Date: 06 Jan 2004 17:54:38 GMT References: Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com Subject: A New Year's Resolution Message-ID: Subj: Is There Some Reason... Date: 2/12/2004 2:18:07 PM Pacific Standard Time From: AloysiousX To: JDrew63929 Is there some reason why you won't let me ask you a few questions, Jan? I'm really curious about your involvement with Ilena Rosenthal. But I guess my most basic question is whether or not you are in California (like I am), or over in Indiana, like your profile says. I had thought you were out west, but I guess not. As Salaam Aleikum! Aloysious Mark Probert AloysiousX http://groups.google.com/group/misc....82e2cde098ded5 http://groups.google.com/group/misc....6f648590b39f16 Nov 29 2005 "Mark Probert" wrote in message news:vfZah.18334$mM1.5367@trndny08... I received this email this morning. Since the sender used anonymous email, I have no way of verifying it or knowing whether it is true or not. I post the full header for reference. ---------begin quoted material-------- Delivered-To: Received: by 10.66.239.8 with SMTP id m8cs80233ugh; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:08:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.119.15 with SMTP id r15mr923548agc.1164730133350; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:08:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f12si25098590qba.2006.11.28.08.08.52; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:08:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of designates 65.39.178.135 as permitted sender) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost.hushmail.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4229BA327A for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:08:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailserver8.hushmail.com (mailserver8.hushmail.com [65.39.178.61]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:08:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mailserver8.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 3E378DA84A; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:08:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:08:37 -0500 To: "Mark Probert" Cc: Subject: Jan Drew From: Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: m To: On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:03:56 -0500 Mark Probert wrote: On 11/28/06, wrote: Dear Mr. Probert: You do not know me, but I live in Indiana. I am writing to you, since you are being attacked by Jan Drew. I know you will understand. Years ago my parents placed me in a child care center run by Jan Drew. It was a nightmare. I was physically and verbally abused by her and other people there. When I did not immediately do what they wanted, I was punished. Sometimes I was made to stay in a dark closet, other times I was not allowed to eat or go to the bathroom. I soiled myself several times and was punished, again, for that. The worst part were the spankings with a big paddle They would make me take my pants down and hit my rear with this. Some people seemed to enjoy watching this. On several occasions, someone would touch me, you know where. They told me not to tell anyone, or they would report my parents for child abuse and have me taken from my home. I was scared to death this would happen and stayed silent. Finally, after years of this abuse, I told my parents what was happening, and they filed a complaint with the State of Indiana. The State investigated and closed her down. Even to this day, I am still afraid of her, and what she can do to me. She is a mean, hurtful person who should never have been allowed to be near children. Jack Dear Jack: I am sorry to hear about what happened to you. Can I post your email to Usenet if I do not display your email address? Mark Probert Dear Mr. Probert: Yes, you can post this to Usenet, or send it to her ISP, or whatever else you want to do with it. Hushmail will protect my identity. Wonders of wonders. Send it, Markey. They need a good laugh. BTW, I have never received anything from my ISP, like you said. *You have now acknowledged receipt of a proper warning, as required by your ISP.* She is a very bad person, and I still have nightmares from what she did to me. Good luck, and I hope you find peace. Jack Reid |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Hypocrisy of Mark Probert | Jan Drew | Kids Health | 8 | July 28th 06 04:07 AM |
More on Mark Probert | mike | Kids Health | 12 | December 7th 05 10:37 PM |
Mark Probert | Mark Probert | Kids Health | 84 | November 27th 05 05:25 PM |
Mark Probert | JanD | Kids Health | 5 | November 21st 05 03:59 AM |
Mark Probert | Mark Probert | Kids Health | 5 | November 20th 05 05:27 PM |