If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
In alt.support.divorce Miss_Kristie wrote:
: Cloaked wrote: : Try this..... : Looked exactly the same to me in his original posting and your "try : this" posting. Perhaps it has to do with the settings our : prospective computers? : -- : Miss Kristie I copied it to MSWord from a HTML document and converted it to text. Then read it in to a Linux based newsreader. It displayed reasonably good on this end. I'd suspect some nonprintable characters may have messed up the works. Nonetheless, it's a landmark decision and "reasonably readable" with my ASCII newsreader program (tin). b. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
In alt.support.divorce Miss_Kristie wrote:
: Cloaked wrote: : Try this..... : Looked exactly the same to me in his original posting and your "try : this" posting. Perhaps it has to do with the settings our : prospective computers? : -- : Miss Kristie I copied it to MSWord from a HTML document and converted it to text. Then read it in to a Linux based newsreader. It displayed reasonably good on this end. I'd suspect some nonprintable characters may have messed up the works. Nonetheless, it's a landmark decision and "reasonably readable" with my ASCII newsreader program (tin). b. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
In alt.support.divorce Miss_Kristie wrote:
: Cloaked wrote: : Try this..... : Looked exactly the same to me in his original posting and your "try : this" posting. Perhaps it has to do with the settings our : prospective computers? : -- : Miss Kristie I copied it to MSWord from a HTML document and converted it to text. Then read it in to a Linux based newsreader. It displayed reasonably good on this end. I'd suspect some nonprintable characters may have messed up the works. Nonetheless, it's a landmark decision and "reasonably readable" with my ASCII newsreader program (tin). b. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
This is good, good news in a landmark case that was being watched very closely by many groups. The decision simply allowes the court to consider the relationship of the child to the parents when considering change of custody requests with circumstance. Of course, the National Organization of Women and other "women's groups" bitterly opposed this concept in cases like this - because it puts the interest of the children ahead of the interest of the custodial parent - who in 85% of the cases is a woman. So, they consider this ruling to be an "erosion of women's rights". Pretty transparent agenda, as you can see. Best - Fido wrote in : Court: Closer scrutiny in custody case moves |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
This is good, good news in a landmark case that was being watched very closely by many groups. The decision simply allowes the court to consider the relationship of the child to the parents when considering change of custody requests with circumstance. Of course, the National Organization of Women and other "women's groups" bitterly opposed this concept in cases like this - because it puts the interest of the children ahead of the interest of the custodial parent - who in 85% of the cases is a woman. So, they consider this ruling to be an "erosion of women's rights". Pretty transparent agenda, as you can see. Best - Fido wrote in : Court: Closer scrutiny in custody case moves |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
This is good, good news in a landmark case that was being watched very closely by many groups. The decision simply allowes the court to consider the relationship of the child to the parents when considering change of custody requests with circumstance. Of course, the National Organization of Women and other "women's groups" bitterly opposed this concept in cases like this - because it puts the interest of the children ahead of the interest of the custodial parent - who in 85% of the cases is a woman. So, they consider this ruling to be an "erosion of women's rights". Pretty transparent agenda, as you can see. Best - Fido wrote in : Court: Closer scrutiny in custody case moves |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Calif. Custody Law-Very good change
Justice Joyce Kennard, the sole dissenter, said Bruiniers "never
mentioned the potential harm to the children from losing their mother as their primary caretaker, despite undisputed evidence that this harm would be significant." Justice Kennard is conveniently ignoring the fact that the mother is *choosing* to leave. The kids have a family. A mother and a father. That should not even be allowed to be broken any more than divorce already does that, when any or either of the parents wants to maintain their relationships with their kids. One parent gets married and wants to move? Tough. They have a choice to make. -- Jealousy is simply and clearly the fear that you do not have value. Jealousy scans for evidence to prove the point - that others will be preferred and rewarded more than you. ~ Jennifer James |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on breastpumps, Part 1/2 | Beth Weiss | Info and FAQ's | 1 | June 28th 04 07:42 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | April 17th 04 12:26 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | April 17th 04 12:24 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on breastpumps, Part 1/2 | Beth Weiss | Info and FAQ's | 1 | April 3rd 04 12:36 PM |
A Good Man | chillin' | Child Support | 83 | September 28th 03 05:37 AM |