|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
April 27th 05, 09:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message . net... FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Yo Toddster, What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%? See the postscript. Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic says, "Strictly speaking, nutrition is not chiropractic." http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/petersen/index.html Donald, There is scientific evidence that dietary error exists and causes disease and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrrected. There is NO scientific evidence that chiropractic's hypothetical biomechanical error ("vertebral subluxation") exists and causes disease and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrected. For Dr. DD Palmer, adjusting/correcting error was definitely chiropractic. Why would adjusting/correcting dietary error not be part of chiropractic? Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians a 1) routinely closing birth canals up to 30%; 2) routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck; and 3) routinely pulling with hands, forceps and vacuums with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. Sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some get paralyzed - some "only" have their spines gruesomely wrenched. Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should also be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians are slicing vaginas and abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals - even as they close birth canals up to 30%. DONALD: Many chiros indicate that birth trauma can cause vertebral subluxations. Thanks in part to your editorial silence, the chiropractic profession is missing a golden opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. Of course, you are not the only silent voice in chiropractic... See Birth and German 'lay manipulators' (heilpraktikers) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3493 See also: Chiropractic, Pediatrics and Pregnancy http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3471 And see: Chiro exams *at* birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3491 And don't miss: Birth and the International Chiropractors Association http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3498 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "For chiros only: Speaking of strictly speaking" 
|
|
#3
April 28th 05, 06:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message . net... FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Yo Toddster, What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd See the postscript. Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic says, "Strictly speaking, nutrition is not chiropractic." http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/petersen/index.html Donald, There is scientific evidence that dietary error exists and causes disease and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrrected. There is NO scientific evidence that chiropractic's hypothetical biomechanical error ("vertebral subluxation") exists and causes disease and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrected. For Dr. DD Palmer, adjusting/correcting error was definitely chiropractic. Why would adjusting/correcting dietary error not be part of chiropractic? Todd Dr. Gastaldo PS FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING... Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians a 1) routinely closing birth canals up to 30%; 2) routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck; and 3) routinely pulling with hands, forceps and vacuums with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%. Sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some get paralyzed - some "only" have their spines gruesomely wrenched. Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should also be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians are slicing vaginas and abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals - even as they close birth canals up to 30%. DONALD: Many chiros indicate that birth trauma can cause vertebral subluxations. Thanks in part to your editorial silence, the chiropractic profession is missing a golden opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust by hand. Of course, you are not the only silent voice in chiropractic... See Birth and German 'lay manipulators' (heilpraktikers) http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3493 See also: Chiropractic, Pediatrics and Pregnancy http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3471 And see: Chiro exams *at* birth http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3491 And don't miss: Birth and the International Chiropractors Association http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3498 Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "For chiros only: Speaking of strictly speaking"
|
|
#4
April 28th 05, 11:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states .......
|
|
#5
April 28th 05, 12:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
OB PERPS
Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by OBs. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states ...... Joel, It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB perps remain at large. OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below. THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley: "ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of medico-legal care..." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm In cases where the baby MUST be resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this question. My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse. A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online after I complained. OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed to www.ohsuwomenshealth.com... See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU) http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986 (If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to know about it.) PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above. THE SOLUTION: 1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. 2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place. NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today. I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes kills. Thanks for reading everyone. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA
|
|
#6
April 28th 05, 02:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who is humorously making light?
I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted .... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... OB PERPS Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by OBs. "Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message ... "Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message k.net... ? As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal. Todd REPLY WoW! Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states ...... Joel, It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB perps remain at large. OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below. THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley: "ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of medico-legal care..." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm In cases where the baby MUST be resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this question. My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse. A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online after I complained. OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed to www.ohsuwomenshealth.com... See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU) http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986 (If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to know about it.) PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above. THE SOLUTION: 1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. 2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place. NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today. I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes kills. Thanks for reading everyone. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Birth stuff (also: Dr. Mal is part of God - chiropractically speaking) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | February 21st 05 05:55 PM |
Hybrid Mode
