If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
On May 13, 12:01�am, "Bob Whiteside" wrote:
"Relayer" wrote in message oups.com... On May 12, 7:52?pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote: Regardless of all that crap- "Kelly noted in his opinion that Frampton had held himself out as a stepparent to the children by being present at the birth of one of the children, contributing "in excess of $13,000" over the last four years, buying them toys and having borrowed money to obtain a vehicle in which to transport the children. " Since when does a step parent required to provide support? In addition, why is this money given a show of support, when 999.9999999999999999999999% of the time, money given like that when it is intended AS support but not earmarked as such upfront considered a gift to child/parent by the court. Because the courts have consistently ruled a gift to the child does not apply against a CS obligation owed to the CP. You may not have thought about this aspect of CS orders before, but this is a most distressing portion of the CS issue. *If an obligor or obligee is deceased a legal battle can ensue over who is the next in line to pay or receive CS. *CS does not legally end when one of the parents die. Subsequent spouses or heirs can be ordered to pay CS out of inheritances in their names.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - In my case, after 15 years of CS and 5 kids, there aren't many scraps left to fight over. However, when I die, I am sad to say I might be forced to miss the "cage match" in which my two ex wives will certainly be engaged. I can't decide what would be better, eternal life in Heaven or eternity in Hell plus a ticket to the "event". |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
Bob Whiteside wrote: "Relayer" wrote in message oups.com... On May 12, 7:52?pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote: Because the courts have consistently ruled a gift to the child does not apply against a CS obligation owed to the CP. See, this has always bugged me big time. As we all know, NCP's have a long history of showering CP's with money above and beyond their CS obligation. It really should be the reverse. ANY money given to CP should be considered CS unless PROVEN otherwise. The burden of proof should be on the CP. Since when is the victim forced to show burden of proof. And when a CP defrauds the court and defrauds the NCP, that makes the NCP the victim. The NCP is the ONE who lost the $$, not the CP. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
"Relayer" wrote in message ps.com... On May 13, 12:01?am, "Bob Whiteside" wrote: "Relayer" wrote in message oups.com... On May 12, 7:52?pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote: Regardless of all that crap- "Kelly noted in his opinion that Frampton had held himself out as a stepparent to the children by being present at the birth of one of the children, contributing "in excess of $13,000" over the last four years, buying them toys and having borrowed money to obtain a vehicle in which to transport the children. " Since when does a step parent required to provide support? In addition, why is this money given a show of support, when 999.9999999999999999999999% of the time, money given like that when it is intended AS support but not earmarked as such upfront considered a gift to child/parent by the court. Because the courts have consistently ruled a gift to the child does not apply against a CS obligation owed to the CP. You may not have thought about this aspect of CS orders before, but this is a most distressing portion of the CS issue. If an obligor or obligee is deceased a legal battle can ensue over who is the next in line to pay or receive CS. CS does not legally end when one of the parents die. Subsequent spouses or heirs can be ordered to pay CS out of inheritances in their names.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - In my case, after 15 years of CS and 5 kids, there aren't many scraps left to fight over. However, when I die, I am sad to say I might be forced to miss the "cage match" in which my two ex wives will certainly be engaged. I can't decide what would be better, eternal life in Heaven or eternity in Hell plus a ticket to the "event". -------------- That's right. The race will be on to see which ex-spouse can file first to receive any Social Security Survivor Benefits. If things turn out, they may kill each other on the steps of the Social Secutity office. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
Bob Whiteside wrote:
CS does not terminate if one of the parents die. An inheritance is considered a gift to the child and does not replace CS payments required to be paid to the CP, i.e. any gift to a minor child does not count towards ongoing CS payments owed to the adult judgment creditor. Okay, a "gift" as in voluntary, right? All right, how about this: I set up my estate to make those child support payments until the child turns 18. Also, in my will, I state that the child will inherit nothing. Let's see how fast it takes them to turn that "gift" into a right. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
"John Meyer" wrote in message . .. Bob Whiteside wrote: CS does not terminate if one of the parents die. An inheritance is considered a gift to the child and does not replace CS payments required to be paid to the CP, i.e. any gift to a minor child does not count towards ongoing CS payments owed to the adult judgment creditor. Okay, a "gift" as in voluntary, right? All right, how about this: I set up my estate to make those child support payments until the child turns 18. Also, in my will, I state that the child will inherit nothing. Let's see how fast it takes them to turn that "gift" into a right. I'm not your enemy. I'm just pointing out reality. And obviously this is an area of CS law you have not considered before. CS obligations after death do not automatically end. The courts still have jurisdiction over both parents' estates and can rule against what is in a will unless the will fits into the legal perimeters court's recognize. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
Bob Whiteside wrote:
"John Meyer" wrote in message . .. Bob Whiteside wrote: CS does not terminate if one of the parents die. An inheritance is considered a gift to the child and does not replace CS payments required to be paid to the CP, i.e. any gift to a minor child does not count towards ongoing CS payments owed to the adult judgment creditor. Okay, a "gift" as in voluntary, right? All right, how about this: I set up my estate to make those child support payments until the child turns 18. Also, in my will, I state that the child will inherit nothing. Let's see how fast it takes them to turn that "gift" into a right. I'm not your enemy. I'm just pointing out reality. And obviously this is an area of CS law you have not considered before. CS obligations after death do not automatically end. The courts still have jurisdiction over both parents' estates and can rule against what is in a will unless the will fits into the legal perimeters court's recognize. I know Bob, and I'm not attacking you. I'm just saying that you'll see a lot of two-faced judges out there who will turn that "gift" into a legal right of some sorts. Heads you lose, tails you lose. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
"John Meyer" wrote in message . .. Bob Whiteside wrote: "John Meyer" wrote in message . .. Bob Whiteside wrote: CS does not terminate if one of the parents die. An inheritance is considered a gift to the child and does not replace CS payments required to be paid to the CP, i.e. any gift to a minor child does not count towards ongoing CS payments owed to the adult judgment creditor. Okay, a "gift" as in voluntary, right? All right, how about this: I set up my estate to make those child support payments until the child turns 18. Also, in my will, I state that the child will inherit nothing. Let's see how fast it takes them to turn that "gift" into a right. I'm not your enemy. I'm just pointing out reality. And obviously this is an area of CS law you have not considered before. CS obligations after death do not automatically end. The courts still have jurisdiction over both parents' estates and can rule against what is in a will unless the will fits into the legal perimeters court's recognize. I know Bob, and I'm not attacking you. I'm just saying that you'll see a lot of two-faced judges out there who will turn that "gift" into a legal right of some sorts. Heads you lose, tails you lose. There are two gross inequities in family law related to this topic. First, only the obligor is required to carry life insurance to guarantee their CS payments. It would seem to me that if the CP actually has an obligation to provide their share of CS too, then they would also be required to carry life insurance to guarantee their portion of CS. And second, life insurance is ordered in a fixed amount. That means the last payment (let's say it's $500 per month) is guaranteed by the full amount of the insurance policy (let's say it's $100,000). What really needs to be done about this is to allow decreasing term life insurance that goes down in value and cost over the course of the CS payments. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
On May 14, 1:08 pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote:
First, only the obligor is required to carry life insurance to guarantee their CS payments. It would seem to me that if the CP actually has an obligation to provide their share of CS too, then they would also be required to carry life insurance to guarantee their portion of CS. Isn't this part of a due process and equal protection argument in how child support is ordered in the first place. I have never seen a Virginia Child Support Order mandate that a custodial parent pay ONE DIME toward the support of a child - never. As such, I'm placed into a category of being ordered to support a child merely because I was named the non-custodial parent. I'm off to Roanoke, Virginia today, folks. There is a U.S. District Court hearing relating to a father suing the Prince William County Circuit Court, which happens to be the jurisdiction all of my support proceedings take place in. The hearing is obviously a Motion to Dismiss by the Judges, etc. If it's not dismissed, I'm going to join as a third-party plaintiff. The hearing is a 1:30 this afternoon for any local parties who may wish to attend. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
On May 15, 9:29�am, " wrote:
On May 14, 1:08 pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote: First, only the obligor is required to carry life insurance to guarantee their CS payments. *It would seem to me that if the CP actually has an obligation to provide their share of CS too, then they would also be required to carry life insurance to guarantee their portion of CS. Isn't this part of a due process and equal protection argument in how child support is ordered in the first place. I have never seen a Virginia Child Support Order mandate that a custodial parent pay ONE DIME toward the support of a child - never. As such, I'm placed into a category of being ordered to support a child merely because I was named the non-custodial parent. I'm off to Roanoke, Virginia today, folks. There is a U.S. District Court hearing relating to a father suing the Prince William County Circuit Court, which happens to be the jurisdiction all of my support proceedings take place in. The hearing is obviously a Motion to Dismiss by the Judges, etc. If it's not dismissed, I'm going to join as a third-party plaintiff. The hearing is a 1:30 this afternoon for any local parties who may wish to attend. Illinois also does not require the CP to pay a dime towards the upbringing of the children. The CP could sit on her ass all day, eating bon-bons and watching soap operas and thats A-OK with Illinois. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
PA: Sperm doner MUST pay child support
On May 11, 2:08 pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote:
"John Meyer" wrote in message . .. wrote: http://blog.pennlive.com/patriotnews...ourt_rules_tha.... html Superior Court holds sperm donor responsible for child support for children of separated lesbian couple Posted by Reggie Sheffield/The Patriot-News May 09, 2007 13:00PM In what legal experts are calling a precedent, a three-judge panel of the state Superior Court has ruled that a York County man must pay child support for two children of a lesbian couple for whom he acted as a sperm donor. Quoting an earlier court decision, Senior Judge John T.K. Kelly wrote that "stepparents who have held a child out as their own are liable for support; biological parents who have exercised the rights appurtenant to that status can be no less bound." Actually, isn't this the case where the estate has to pay child support? And if that's the case, I have a question: in joint couples, I believe requirements for support stop when you die. There's inheritance, but that is not a regular payment. CS does not terminate if one of the parents die. An inheritance is considered a gift to the child and does not replace CS payments required to be paid to the CP, i.e. any gift to a minor child does not count towards ongoing CS payments owed to the adult judgment creditor. There are three possible scenarios a court can order for CS after the death of the obligor. 1.) Payments can be continued. This is usually by agreement of the parties. 2.) Payments can be converted to a lump sum. This is usually the life insurance value required to guarantee future CS. 3.) Payments can be terminated. All of those options are for dealing with an existing CS order. What is unique about the subject ruling is CS, and how it will be handled in the event of the obligor's death, is going to be set after the obligor has died. And of course, the CS will be allocated between three parents rather than two. When the obligee dies, payments continue until the court order is modified to change the custodian for the children. Then the CS payments are either continued, ceased, modified, and paid to a different custodian. Since the obligee is dead they no longer have the need for housing, transportation, food, etc. so the value of these "saved" amounts are counted as income which is used to establish CS payments to the new custodian. This is one of the scenarios where a second husband can be ordered to pay CS to the bio-dad who gets custody of children after his wife's death.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, once again, children of intact family are NOT entitled to further financial support from their parents...in any case, an inheritance...yet the children of divorce are entitled once again...sickning. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sign our Child Support patition for child support reform | [email protected] | Child Support | 0 | February 24th 07 10:01 AM |
Dad paid support for 11 years after child killed - and he just found out child is dead | Dusty | Child Support | 47 | June 17th 06 10:24 PM |
P. Diddy: Child support lawsuit really about 'adult support' | Dusty | Child Support | 0 | September 13th 04 12:35 AM |
Child Support HELP She wants child support & I had custody! | Live Wire Cycles NY/LI | Child Support | 18 | August 1st 03 10:04 PM |
Fear of child unfair child support laws have shaped and defined my life... | Hobbit | Child Support | 9 | July 11th 03 01:27 AM |