If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Deviation from support guidelines?
calculating the support based on the mother earning minimum wage. For
the last 4 years she has only held minimum wage jobs. For many years prior to that she was a paralegal and earning substantially more than minimum wage. Is there any hope of getting a judge to impute a reasonable income for her? Yes, read the laws in your state for deviation, argue accordingly, appeal if neccessary. 2. My husband and I live in the DC metropolitan area and the cost of living is significantly higher here than it is in Dare County, NC (where the mother and child live). Is there any hope of getting a judge to adjust his salary to Dare County dollars for the calculation? Usually, the law states, expenses are important, so yes. 3. The original motion to increase the support was filed in January 2003 but the case has been continued until November due to my husband's absence. Once we go to court, will the increase be retroactive to January? Yes The first two items are the only two that I can think of that could justify deviating from the guidelines. If there is no hope of either is there any point to retaining an attorney? Read the laws. In my experience, family matters are best argued by yourself. It is simple a household budget you are talking about, lawyers I doubt, ever use a budget. Make sure you have all your expenses into evidence at the hearing (go to a hearing, don't waste your time at the first level, where folks plug in the numbers and out comes some "magical" number that kids "are entitled to". Also, rememeber, most guidelines built today (actually years ago) DO NOT address the fact: "The once intact family NOW has TWO OF EVERY BILL" Therefore, how can they possibly "keep up with the jones"? TIA, Annie Kelly |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Deviation from support guidelines?
"AnnieK" wrote in message om... After a 3 year review, the child support my husband pays is to be modified. They want to increase it by over 50%. He is currently in the army and in Baghdad so I am trying to deal with this myself and I have 3 questions. === (See comments below) === 1. This is an IV-D (some sort of public assistance) case. They are calculating the support based on the mother earning minimum wage. For the last 4 years she has only held minimum wage jobs. For many years prior to that she was a paralegal and earning substantially more than minimum wage. Is there any hope of getting a judge to impute a reasonable income for her? == This depends on your jurisdiction. No one can predict this for you unless they have a good knowledge of the laws in your jurisdiction. Generally, when income is imputed for the custodial parent, they will not go back that far. Why is she on welfare and not working? Whether higher income is imputed to her may be based on the reason she has not been working. (More Below) == 2. My husband and I live in the DC metropolitan area and the cost of living is significantly higher here than it is in Dare County, NC (where the mother and child live). Is there any hope of getting a judge to adjust his salary to Dare County dollars for the calculation? == I have never known a court to do this--doesn't mean it isn't done. It may be at the judge's discretion. Don't count on it, though. (More) == 3. The original motion to increase the support was filed in January 2003 but the case has been continued until November due to my husband's absence. Once we go to court, will the increase be retroactive to January? == Yes. == The first two items are the only two that I can think of that could justify deviating from the guidelines. If there is no hope of either is there any point to retaining an attorney? === Unless there is some kind of variance for military personnel, I can see no reason why you need an attorney at this stage. If you were dealing with arguable arrears and a significant amount of money, I would recommend an attorney--otherwise it can be handled without that expense. Child support modifications are fairly cut and dried. The numbers are plugged into the formula and the amount of support appears. Some jurisdictions allow variances for subsequent families and some don't. Good luck and best wishes. This must be a very strenuous time for you and your husband. BTW, the retroactive support is usually reduced to a small installment tacked on to the monthly payment so it will not likely be a lump sum payout you will have to come up with. === === TIA, Annie Kelly |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Deviation from support guidelines?
"Bob Whiteside" wrote:
"AnnieK" wrote in message . com... It doesn't mattter how much income they impute to the child's mother. If it is high or low your husband will still end up paying the same amount of CS. The CS guidelines and calculation process are loaded to take a fixed percentage from the NCP father. Wrong. There are three different types of child support models used in the US: the Income Shares Model, Percentage of Income Model, and the Melson Formula (which is a more complicated version of the Income Shares Model). See: http://www.ncsl.org/programs/cyf/models.htm North Carolina, when the OP stated the current child support action is from, is a state that uses the Shared Incomes Model. However Washington DC has the Percentage Model. IMHO it would be better for her to keep the case in NC, a shared income state. 2. My husband and I live in the DC metropolitan area and the cost of living is significantly higher here than it is in Dare County, NC (where the mother and child live). Is there any hope of getting a judge to adjust his salary to Dare County dollars for the calculation? Not much. Normally the state CS guidelines where the child(ren) live takes precedence. You can try to show what the CS award would be if it were made in your state with the chidlren living there, but it might actually be higher than the other state. The OP might want to go to this site: http://www.divorcehq.com/calculators.html and use their child support calculator (covers all states) in order to get some idea what she and her husband might be facing. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Deviation from support guidelines?
AnnieK wrote:
snip All good advice, from the above. My two sense. 1. It doesn't hurt to argue any of the facts you stated above. The judge's have and use discretion. If you can present enough of a good reason for the judge to do it differently he can and possibly will. But, make sure you present it right. 2. You might want to talk to someone at your husbands base. I do know that certain states have passed and are considering legislation affecting those in the military, regarding CS payments. Also, they may be able to help by providing legal counsel at no or low cost considering the circumstances. It doesn't hurt to ask. ~ Dani |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Deviation from support guidelines?
Not an attoreny, but here is my opinion based on my experience.
AnnieK wrote in message om... After a 3 year review, the child support my husband pays is to be modified. They want to increase it by over 50%. He is currently in the army and in Baghdad so I am trying to deal with this myself and I have 3 questions. 1. This is an IV-D (some sort of public assistance) case. They are calculating the support based on the mother earning minimum wage. For the last 4 years she has only held minimum wage jobs. For many years prior to that she was a paralegal and earning substantially more than minimum wage. Is there any hope of getting a judge to impute a reasonable income for her? Of course it is possible. But reasonable depends on circumstances. For instances, why is she only earning minimum wages? Where was the case filed? What are the differences in the cost of living between where she lives and where he lives. For the same job, what is the difference in pay between locations? Where was the case filed? All of these question may have a bearing on the outcome of the case. 2. My husband and I live in the DC metropolitan area and the cost of living is significantly higher here than it is in Dare County, NC (where the mother and child live). Is there any hope of getting a judge to adjust his salary to Dare County dollars for the calculation? If the cost of living is significantly lower in Dare County, I think the best hope lies in getting the case heard in Dare County. 3. The original motion to increase the support was filed in January 2003 but the case has been continued until November due to my husband's absence. Once we go to court, will the increase be retroactive to January? In all likelihood, yes. It isn't required, but it is legal. Unless the NCP can set aside the difference between the current payment and the increased payment, it is to his advantage to get the case heard in the proper venue as soon as possible. The first two items are the only two that I can think of that could justify deviating from the guidelines. If there is no hope of either is there any point to retaining an attorney? I think your best hope lies in getting Dare County to claim jurisdiction, and showing that there is a significant difference between the cost of living in Dare County and the DC metro area, and the the pay for similar jobs is not different . But you will need hard numbers and proof of those numbers. I think what you ask is a stretch, but you don't get what you don't ask for! As for an attorney, my advise is get one if she has one. Since it is a IV-D case she probably has one, it probably is the state that is seeking the increase. TIA, Annie Kelly |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Deviation from support guidelines?
PrchrdnS wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote: "AnnieK" wrote in message . com... It doesn't mattter how much income they impute to the child's mother. If it is high or low your husband will still end up paying the same amount of CS. The CS guidelines and calculation process are loaded to take a fixed percentage from the NCP father. Wrong. Under the income shares model it still is true. I live in an income shares state, and my ex's income has practically no effect on the amount of CS, I pay. The formulae may be different between models, but the end results are virtually identical. There are three different types of child support models used in the US: the Income Shares Model, Percentage of Income Model, and the Melson Formula (which is a more complicated version of the Income Shares Model). See: http://www.ncsl.org/programs/cyf/models.htm North Carolina, when the OP stated the current child support action is from, is a state that uses the Shared Incomes Model. However Washington DC has the Percentage Model. IMHO it would be better for her to keep the case in NC, a shared income state. Except for the fact that regardless of the model used by a particular state, the outcome for the NCP is almost the same, dollar-wise, even though the formula is different. However, I agree that NC is probably the better venue, because I think the success of showing circumstances that warrant a deviation are better. The poster really should run the numbers under Dare County guidelines and their county of residence guidelines, to make an informed decision. 2. My husband and I live in the DC metropolitan area and the cost of living is significantly higher here than it is in Dare County, NC (where the mother and child live). Is there any hope of getting a judge to adjust his salary to Dare County dollars for the calculation? Not much. Normally the state CS guidelines where the child(ren) live takes precedence. You can try to show what the CS award would be if it were made in your state with the chidlren living there, but it might actually be higher than the other state. Again not true, precedence is established by original jurisdiction, under the theory that the venue of original jurisdiction is more competent to adjudicate the matter, and the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution (You can't court shop in an attempt to find a sympathetic court). You can argue this, but the nod goes to the court that has original jurisdiction. IOW, to sucessfully change venues in the face of opposition, requires an additional showing, such as hardship, lack of competence, etc. The OP might want to go to this site: http://www.divorcehq.com/calculators.html and use their child support calculator (covers all states) in order to get some idea what she and her husband might be facing. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Deviation from support guidelines?
Bob Whiteside wrote in message rthlink.net... "PrchrdnS" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote: "AnnieK" wrote in message . com... It doesn't mattter how much income they impute to the child's mother. If it is high or low your husband will still end up paying the same amount of CS. The CS guidelines and calculation process are loaded to take a fixed percentage from the NCP father. Wrong. Have you ever run some varying income numbers for a CP through the income shares model support calculators? For every $5,000 change in the CP's income, plus or minus, the NCP's share of the CS changes $5-18 per month. Sure there are minor fluctuations, but the NCP always pays essentially the same percentage of their income regardless of how much the CP earns. Here are some examples from my state for one child with standard visitation: Father's income - $40,000 Mother's income/CS paid by NCP Min wage/$450 $20k/$445 $25k/$436 $30k/$418 $35k/$413 $40k/$408 My point was it makes no sense to spend too much time worrying about how the CP's income is treated since the outcome remains essentially the same for what the NCP pays. Exactly, both the "percent of income model" and the "income shares model" result in virtually the same outcome for the NCP. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Deviation from support guidelines?
frazil wrote: PrchrdnS wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote: "AnnieK" wrote in message e.com... It doesn't mattter how much income they impute to the child's mother. If it is high or low your husband will still end up paying the same amount of CS. The CS guidelines and calculation process are loaded to take a fixed percentage from the NCP father. Wrong. Today I was surfing the PA websites and read something in the DR section of the laws regarding custody which states the mother's status of having custody is her portion of the CS and the dad's absence leaves him monetary support for his children as his only way to provide a comperable amout of support. Give me a while to sort through the history on my browser and I'll find the link for you. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Deviation from support guidelines?
There seems to be some confusion. My point is that under either the income
shares model or the percent of income model the CP income, all other things being equal, makes no difference in the amount the NCP pays. Further, given the same CP and NCP incomes the income shares model and the percent of income model give the same dollar amount. Virginia wrote in message ... frazil wrote: PrchrdnS wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote: "AnnieK" wrote in message e.com... It doesn't mattter how much income they impute to the child's mother. If it is high or low your husband will still end up paying the same amount of CS. The CS guidelines and calculation process are loaded to take a fixed percentage from the NCP father. Wrong. Today I was surfing the PA websites and read something in the DR section of the laws regarding custody which states the mother's status of having custody is her portion of the CS and the dad's absence leaves him monetary support for his children as his only way to provide a comperable amout of support. Give me a while to sort through the history on my browser and I'll find the link for you. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[FAQ] Posting guidelines for misc.kids.moderated | Moderation Team | General (moderated) | 0 | May 5th 04 08:21 PM |
[FAQ] Posting guidelines for misc.kids.moderated | Moderation Team | General (moderated) | 0 | April 5th 04 10:04 PM |
[FAQ] Posting guidelines for misc.kids.moderated | Moderation Team | General (moderated) | 0 | December 5th 03 09:29 PM |
[FAQ] Posting guidelines for misc.kids.moderated | Moderation Team | General (moderated) | 0 | November 5th 03 09:07 PM |
[FAQ] Posting guidelines for misc.kids.moderated | Moderation Team | General (moderated) | 0 | July 5th 03 10:01 PM |