If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
COURTS REFUSE TO SEE FATHERS AS NECESSARY
http://www.silive.com/siadvance/stor...970.xml&coll=1
COURTS REFUSE TO SEE FATHERS AS NECESSARY Saturday, February 07, 2009 Staten Island Advance I read with interest how "More Staten Island dads are waging custody wars." But I keep asking, "Why?" Why do custody courts "award" the child of divorce to one parent (usually the mother) if both parents are fit and loving? And why do these same courts order the other parent (usually the dad) to pay child support if both parents earn an equitable amount? Could it be because the state has a stake in broken families? Many people do not know that for every child support order, the state receives money from Washington. And the larger the child-support order, the more the state receives. I guess my cry of "why?" is actually a cry of "Waah!" The only aspect of sole custody sadder than taking a child away from a fit father is taking a father away from a child. When will our legal system realize this wisdom? Children need both parents! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
COURTS REFUSE TO SEE FATHERS AS NECESSARY
Children have a right to both parents, the State needs to keep their greedy
hands out of a family's business! "Dusty" wrote in message ... http://www.silive.com/siadvance/stor...970.xml&coll=1 COURTS REFUSE TO SEE FATHERS AS NECESSARY Saturday, February 07, 2009 Staten Island Advance I read with interest how "More Staten Island dads are waging custody wars." But I keep asking, "Why?" Why do custody courts "award" the child of divorce to one parent (usually the mother) if both parents are fit and loving? And why do these same courts order the other parent (usually the dad) to pay child support if both parents earn an equitable amount? Could it be because the state has a stake in broken families? Many people do not know that for every child support order, the state receives money from Washington. And the larger the child-support order, the more the state receives. I guess my cry of "why?" is actually a cry of "Waah!" The only aspect of sole custody sadder than taking a child away from a fit father is taking a father away from a child. When will our legal system realize this wisdom? Children need both parents! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Refuse CPS Services? | Greegor | Spanking | 13 | June 15th 07 03:54 AM |
Refuse CPS Services? | Greegor | Spanking | 0 | June 9th 07 06:29 AM |
Refuse CPS Services? | Greegor | Foster Parents | 0 | June 9th 07 06:29 AM |
VACCINATIONS AND THE RIGHT TO REFUSE | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 6 | December 13th 06 10:00 PM |
VACCINATIONS AND THE RIGHT TO REFUSE | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 7 | July 28th 06 03:18 PM |