If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
"Ilena Rose" wrote in message ... From Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal: Driving cars innocent kids kill many people. Where are your sympathies for the kids that drove and killed? When you are instructed as to possible damage you might do using power tools, lawnmowers, automobiles, and all the various sides of homopathetic drugs as well as medicinal drugs do you ever pay attention to them? Or like others do you ignore it all and say it can't happen to me or my kids. Where is your rational? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
"Peter B" .@. wrote in message ... "Ilena Rose" wrote in message ... From Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal: Driving cars innocent kids kill many people. Where are your sympathies for the kids that drove and killed? When you are instructed as to possible damage you might do using power tools, lawnmowers, automobiles, and all the various sides of homopathetic drugs as well as medicinal drugs do you ever pay attention to them? Or like others do you ignore it all and say it can't happen to me or my kids. Where is your rational? This ng is about alternative health and the dangers of pharmaceutical drugs. If there are is a problem with a pharmaceutical drug why should we take it as par for the course? Why are people taking these drugs to adjust their moods at all? Your comments as usual, are inane and stupid. No doubt you threw "homopathetic drugs" into the mix merely as some form of sensationalism merely to get a reaction -- your usual irrational MO. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
"carole" wrote in message nd.com... "Peter B" .@. wrote in message ... "Ilena Rose" wrote in message ... From Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal: Driving cars innocent kids kill many people. Where are your sympathies for the kids that drove and killed? When you are instructed as to possible damage you might do using power tools, lawnmowers, automobiles, and all the various sides of homopathetic drugs as well as medicinal drugs do you ever pay attention to them? Or like others do you ignore it all and say it can't happen to me or my kids. Where is your rational? This ng is about alternative health and the dangers of pharmaceutical drugs. If there are is a problem with a pharmaceutical drug why should we take it as par for the course? Why are people taking these drugs to adjust their moods at all? Your comments as usual, are inane and stupid. No doubt you threw "homopathetic drugs" into the mix merely as some form of sensationalism merely to get a reaction -- your usual irrational MO. PKB? I think so. It is not about the perceived dangers of Pharmaceutical Drugs at all although many of your ilk make it thus. It is supposed to be for alternative meds, not voo doo who do, crystals, rocks, metals and silica. You are as guilty as any plus your sense of humor leaves a lot to be desired. Maybe if you toe the straight and narrow others will too. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
"Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:56:14 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Peter B" .@. wrote in message ... "Ilena Rose" wrote in message ... From Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal: Driving cars innocent kids kill many people. Where are your sympathies for the kids that drove and killed? When you are instructed as to possible damage you might do using power tools, lawnmowers, automobiles, and all the various sides of homopathetic drugs as well as medicinal drugs do you ever pay attention to them? Or like others do you ignore it all and say it can't happen to me or my kids. Where is your rational? This ng is about alternative health and the dangers of pharmaceutical drugs. No Carole, there is nothing in the charter about discussion of dangers of pharmaceutical drugs. You just like to add things which are unnecessary or inflammatory, don't you? If there are is a problem with a pharmaceutical drug why should we take it as par for the course? Why are people taking these drugs to adjust their moods at all? Because without them their quality of life suffers. The problems most people with mental illness, to often, Decide to go off their medications without the support they need to do so. Your comments as usual, are inane and stupid. Are you looking in a mirror again Carole? No doubt you threw "homopathetic drugs" into the mix merely as some form of sensationalism merely to get a reaction -- your usual irrational MO. You know that think you have about shown to be an idiot? You doing it again, Carole. No, this ng is concerned with the uselessness and dangers of drugs, merely to counter all the pharmaceutical apologists that populate it. There are only about 1 or 2 real alties in the group, the vast majority being pro pharmaceutical. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
"Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:49:52 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:56:14 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: "Peter B" .@. wrote in message ... "Ilena Rose" wrote in message ... From Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal: Driving cars innocent kids kill many people. Where are your sympathies for the kids that drove and killed? When you are instructed as to possible damage you might do using power tools, lawnmowers, automobiles, and all the various sides of homopathetic drugs as well as medicinal drugs do you ever pay attention to them? Or like others do you ignore it all and say it can't happen to me or my kids. Where is your rational? This ng is about alternative health and the dangers of pharmaceutical drugs. No Carole, there is nothing in the charter about discussion of dangers of pharmaceutical drugs. You just like to add things which are unnecessary or inflammatory, don't you? If there are is a problem with a pharmaceutical drug why should we take it as par for the course? Why are people taking these drugs to adjust their moods at all? Because without them their quality of life suffers. The problems most people with mental illness, to often, Decide to go off their medications without the support they need to do so. Your comments as usual, are inane and stupid. Are you looking in a mirror again Carole? No doubt you threw "homopathetic drugs" into the mix merely as some form of sensationalism merely to get a reaction -- your usual irrational MO. You know that think you have about shown to be an idiot? You doing it again, Carole. No, this ng is concerned with the uselessness and dangers of drugs, merely to counter all the pharmaceutical apologists that populate it. It isn't up to you to decide that Carole. The users themselves make the decision by participation. Peter b said "No Carole, there is nothing in the charter about discussion of dangers of pharmaceutical drugs. You just like to add things which are unnecessary or inflammatory, don't you?" There are only about 1 or 2 real alties in the group, the vast majority being pro pharmaceutical. Well I happen to be pro-truth. and pro-evidence. That's all very nice bob, but what happens when the evidence is stolen or otherwise goes missing? Do you really think you are in a position to understand how the system works? "Outlawing books that tell me how to heal myself (such as Stale Food Versus Fresh Food) is racketeering activity. What the medical gangsters have done to Rife, Hoxsey, Gerson, Ivy, Durovic, Privitera, Krebs, Koch, Crane, Warner, Keller, Ghadiali, Beard, Taylor, Wright, Brodie, Naessens, Burzynski, Halstead, Richardson, Thurston, Pixley, Bolles and many others are great crimes, nearly invariably done in the name of "protecting the public." " Were is your own evidence about the foot fungus? That right you have none. and most of what you do post, is basically nothing but fallacies. Exactly what I mean bob. Until you get given evidence, you don't believe anything. You live in your own little world, and the idea of a bigger picture where things are manipulated from high up the food chain doesn't compute with you. You think that showing some peer reviewed study or some randomed controlled clinical study shows the evidence and that the evidence can never be wrong. What you don't understand is that there are very few pieces of scientific evidence that haven't got a opposing view, or that can't be controlled or manipulated. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
"carole" wrote in
nd.com: "Outlawing books that tell me how to heal myself (such as Stale Food Versus Fresh Food) is racketeering activity. What the medical gangsters have done to Rife, Hoxsey, Gerson, Ivy, Durovic, Privitera, Krebs, Koch, Crane, Warner, Keller, Ghadiali, Beard, Taylor, Wright, Brodie, Naessens, Burzynski, Halstead, Richardson, Thurston, Pixley, Bolles and many others are great crimes, nearly invariably done in the name of "protecting the public." " Let's take a look of those "heroes" then. Rife's been already dealt with previously, so I won't post about him again. Hoxsey's herbal treatments include a paste of antimony, zinc and bloodroot, arsenic, sulfur, and talc for external treatments. There is also a liquid tonic of licorice, red clover, burdock root, Stillingia root, barberry, Cascara, prickly ash bark, buckthorn bark, and potassium iodide to be taken internally. The paste is very caustic and can burn or scar the skin. The liquid tonic can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anxiety, trembling, abdominal cramps and heart block. Moreover, red clover mimics estrogen, and would never be suitable for women with estrogen-responsive breast tumors. None of those have a known effect against cancer, and it's a matter of record that Hoxey himself died of the cancer his treatment failed to cure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoxsey_Therapy Gerson described his approach in the book A Cancer Therapy: Results of 50 Cases. However, when Gerson's claims were independently evaluated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), it was found that Gerson's records lacked the basic information necessary to systematically evaluate his claims. The NCI concluded that Gerson's data showed no benefit from his treatment. The therapy is considered scientifically unsupported and potentially hazardous. In response the Gerson Institute staff published a case series in the alternative medical literature; however, the series suffered from significant methodological flaws, and no independent entity has been able to reproduce the Gerson Institute's claims. When a group of 13 patients sickened by elements of the Gerson Therapy were evaluated in hospitals in San Diego in the early 1980s, all of them were found to still have active cancer. The Gerson Institute's claimed "cure rates" have been questioned; an investigation by Quackwatch found that the Institute's claims of cure were based not on actual documentation of survival, but on "a combination of the doctor's estimate that the departing patient has a 'reasonable chance of surviving,' plus feelings that the Institute staff have about the status of people who call in." In 1994, a study published in the alternative medical literature described 18 patients treated for cancer with the Gerson Therapy. Their median survival from treatment was 9 months. Five years after receiving the Gerson treatment, 17 of the 18 patients had died of their cancer, while the one surviving patient had active non- Hodgkin lymphoma. The coffee enemas Gerson therapy uses have contributed to the deaths of at least three people in the United States. Coffee enemas "can cause colitis (inflammation of the bowel), fluid and electrolyte imbalances, and in some cases septicaemia." The recommended diet may not be nutritionally adequate. The diet has been blamed for the deaths of patients who substituted it for standard medical care. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gerson Dr Ivy was taken in by the Durovic brothers who marketed Krebiozen as a cancer cure. Krebiozen when analyzed was found to be only creatine monohydrate, which is an amino acid present in all animal tissue and without value in the treatment of cancer. At the same time. analysis of samples of the drug as packaged for injection into patients showed that only mineral oil was present. In 15 years of illegal distribution as an investigational drug, Krebiozen was tried on thousands of cancer patients without discernible effects. A National Cancer Institute committee of 24 leading cancer experts reviewed 504 case histories provided by Dr. Ivy and found unanimously that Krebiozen was ineffective as an anti-cancer agent. http://www.cancertreatmen****ch.org/q/janssen.shtml Privitera is a convicted criminal, and did 2 months in prison for selling laetrile, which is a dangerous substance known to have caused deaths from cyanide poisoning. It has no effect on cancer. Krebs is the one responsible for laetrile discussed above. Koch claimed he had synthezised ethylene dione, and marketed it under the name of "glyoxylide" and claimed that it was an antidote to the "toxins" that caused every known disease. He claimed 80% cure rate of diseases such as cancer, tuberculosis and leprosy. Government chemists testified in 1943 that glyoxylide was indistinguishable from distilled water. - Gardner, Fads and Fallacies, 1957 Ghadiali marketed the Spectro-Chrome, and claimed that bathing the body with different coloured light cured diseases. The value of his treatment can be seen from the following: "If you are diabetic you eat lots of starches and brown sugar, and bathe the body alternately with yellow and magenta light." A son told in court how Ghadiali had advised his father, a diabetic, to stop taking insulin and give himself doses of colored light. The father lived three weeks. "In 1925, when Ghadiali was on a lecture tour, he was arrested in Seattle and sentenced under the Mann Act to five years in the Atlanta Penitentiary. He later published a two-volume work, Railroading a Citizen, in which he blamed this unjust "persecution" on the medical trusts, the KKK, Catholics, Negroes, Henry Ford, the Department of Justice, and Great Britain. The book reprints the more sensational parts of the trial in which his teen-age secretary accuses him of rape, forcing her into "unnatural practices," and later performing an abortion. Ghadiali's purpose in reprinting this testimony is to allow himself a chance to interject comments accusing the girl of lying. Unfortunately, the impression left on the reader is that the girl was telling a straightforward story." - Gardner, Fads and Fallacies, 1957 That should be enough about how worthy those guys in reality are. Just because some quack makes a claim that they can heal people it does not mean they are honest. Some are outright charlatans and the rest self- deluded. -- Medicine is the only profession that labours incessantly to destroy the reason for its own existence. -James Bryce --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
"Steelclaws" wrote in message . 16.121... "carole" wrote in nd.com: "Outlawing books that tell me how to heal myself (such as Stale Food Versus Fresh Food) is racketeering activity. What the medical gangsters have done to Rife, Hoxsey, Gerson, Ivy, Durovic, Privitera, Krebs, Koch, Crane, Warner, Keller, Ghadiali, Beard, Taylor, Wright, Brodie, Naessens, Burzynski, Halstead, Richardson, Thurston, Pixley, Bolles and many others are great crimes, nearly invariably done in the name of "protecting the public." " Let's take a look of those "heroes" then. Rife's been already dealt with previously, so I won't post about him again. Hoxsey's herbal treatments include a paste of antimony, zinc and bloodroot, arsenic, sulfur, and talc for external treatments. There is also a liquid tonic of licorice, red clover, burdock root, Stillingia root, barberry, Cascara, prickly ash bark, buckthorn bark, and potassium iodide to be taken internally. The paste is very caustic and can burn or scar the skin. The liquid tonic can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anxiety, trembling, abdominal cramps and heart block. Moreover, red clover mimics estrogen, and would never be suitable for women with estrogen-responsive breast tumors. None of those have a known effect against cancer, and it's a matter of record that Hoxey himself died of the cancer his treatment failed to cure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoxsey_Therapy As noted previously, wikipedia isn't very reliable for anything that concerns establishment policy. The current policy is to support pharmaceutical treatments, which has been going on for a long time as there is big money involved. If you want to get the real story you need to read other sources such as http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#hoxsey and reviews at http://www.amazon.com/When-Healing-B.../dp/0892819251 If I was only going to read the wikipedia story, I would agree that Hoxley was a fraud. However, there are other sources. And if you're going to say that some of Hoxley's ingredients were harmful, how to you explain chemo and radiation? I won't go into the rest of the healers you've looked up because it will be the same story --suppression of alternative cures to eliminate the competition. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
"Bob Officer" wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:58:28 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, "carole" wrote: No, this ng is concerned with the uselessness and dangers of drugs, merely to counter all the pharmaceutical apologists that populate it. It isn't up to you to decide that Carole. The users themselves make the decision by participation. Peter b said "No Carole, there is nothing in the charter about discussion of dangers of pharmaceutical drugs. You just like to add things which are unnecessary or inflammatory, don't you?" Which is true, the red herrings you toss in to discussions are designed to do exactly what? Read what you wrote before my response, moron. There are only about 1 or 2 real alties in the group, the vast majority being pro pharmaceutical. Well I happen to be pro-truth. and pro-evidence. That's all very nice bob, but what happens when the evidence is stolen or otherwise goes missing? What evidence are you talking about, Carole. you mean the stuff you keep calling suppressed which can be found by the hundreds of books and web sites? Remember rummy's quote - There are things we know we know, things we know we don't know, and things we don't know that we don't know. These books would fall into the "things we know we don't know" category. ie the knowledge is there but the practise of it is suppressed. They DDT it with propaganda, and exile the treatments to mexico then do writeups in conventional sources to say it didn't work. Really Carole? You don't have a clue. Evidence which is missing will stand out like a glaring red light, just because it is missing. Like a line of prose with a word missing, the Evidence tells a story, the missing evidence will be just like the missing word. One need not make up through speculation and conspiracy wishes missing evidence.. There are intelligence agencies which run around the world finding and confiscating evidence of anything that is to be kept from the public, for whatever contrived reason that best fits with plausible deniability, ie "concern for the public good", "making the world a safer place", "national security" ...take your pick. Do you really think you are in a position to understand how the system works? I am in a far better position than you, are Carole, because I can understand what I read. I understand the evidence and the technicalities and the "Jargon" as you call it often which is the Precision of the Language developed to discuss the evidence. No, I don't think you're in a better position unfortunately because as a skeptic you look for any reasons to discredit anything that doesn't fit in with the status quo. You are a "yes" man posing as an independent thinker. "Outlawing books that tell me how to heal myself (such as Stale Food Versus Fresh Food) is racketeering activity. Fallacy, you haven't shown books actually tell you how to heal yourself. What the medical gangsters have done to Rife, Hoxsey, Gerson, Ivy, Durovic, Privitera, Krebs, Koch, Crane, Sorry We already debunk the claims to show that Rife's story isn't how you and others presented it Carole. You really need to ditch your skeptic dictionary bob. "Debunking" ...what does that tell us? That you (as a skeptic) have decided using your little (inadequate) processes that some therapy or theory isn't valid. Warner, Keller, Ghadiali, Beard, Taylor, Wright, Brodie, Naessens, Burzynski, Halstead, Richardson, Thurston, Pixley, Bolles and many others are great crimes, nearly invariably done in the name of "protecting the public." " Who are you citing about, Carole. and many of those people you claim as visionaries were crackpots. (Young and Kock) Take them one by one and I'll look into them. I'm not going to do the whole list ...one will do for now. And don't use conventional sources to look them up, or wikipedia, the establishment approved encyclopedia. Were is your own evidence about the foot fungus? That right you have none. and most of what you do post, is basically nothing but fallacies. Exactly what I mean bob. Until you get given evidence, you don't believe anything. Which is how science works carole. your anecdotal account is called a story unless backed by evidence. In all things, the burden of proof is the onus of the claimant. There are problems with that MO though - the evidence can be confiscated, there may be reasons such as expense that don't allow satisfactory tests, or the science might not agree with conventional thinking, a whole list of reasons for no evidence - and vice versa. Things WITH evidence may not be satisfactory for various reasons. You live in your own little world, and the idea of a bigger picture where things are manipulated from high up the food chain doesn't compute with you. You do not understand I do see the bigger picture. I understand how the system works and work with it. It is why I am successful person. It all depends on your definition of success - different people have different definitions. All societies develop systems and methods. What you claim as conspiracy is just you anto-social behavior. Oh so you're into playing "blame the victim". Its not the fault of the corrupt system, its the fault of the person talking about it. You think that showing some peer reviewed study or some randomed controlled clinical study shows the evidence and that the evidence can never be wrong. No It could be wrong. when it is wrong it will be shown to be wrong sooner or later. that reason it will show up wrong sooner or later is because those test and data should be tested and replicated and if they are not in agreement then we know something is wrong. Maybe but in the meantime? That's why when you cite a web page which shows the only person which could even preform the tests or see the results claimed was just one person, it is self-evidence that something isn't right. What you don't understand is that there are very few pieces of scientific evidence that haven't got a opposing view, or that can't be controlled or manipulated. Sorry, Carole that is your claim, it is up to you to prove it. carole www.conspiracee.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
"carole" wrote in
news "Outlawing books that tell me how to heal myself (such as Stale Food Versus Fresh Food) is racketeering activity. What the medical gangsters have done to Rife, Hoxsey, Gerson, Ivy, Durovic, Privitera, Krebs, Koch, Crane, Warner, Keller, Ghadiali, Beard, Taylor, Wright, Brodie, Naessens, Burzynski, Halstead, Richardson, Thurston, Pixley, Bolles and many others are great crimes, nearly invariably done in the name of "protecting the public." " Let's take a look of those "heroes" then. Rife's been already dealt with previously, so I won't post about him again. Hoxsey's herbal treatments include a paste of antimony, zinc and bloodroot, arsenic, sulfur, and talc for external treatments. There is also a liquid tonic of licorice, red clover, burdock root, Stillingia root, barberry, Cascara, prickly ash bark, buckthorn bark, and potassium iodide to be taken internally. The paste is very caustic and can burn or scar the skin. The liquid tonic can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anxiety, trembling, abdominal cramps and heart block. Moreover, red clover mimics estrogen, and would never be suitable for women with estrogen-responsive breast tumors. None of those have a known effect against cancer, and it's a matter of record that Hoxey himself died of the cancer his treatment failed to cure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoxsey_Therapy As noted previously, wikipedia isn't very reliable for anything that concerns establishment policy. As noted previously, you only have empty assertions about your claim, but evidence is missing. Please also remember I do check the references, and wikipedia editors cannot change the contents of external links. The current policy is to support pharmaceutical treatments, which has been going on for a long time as there is big money involved. If you want to get the real story you need to read other sources such as http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#hoxsey and reviews at http://www.amazon.com/When-Healing-Becomes-Crime- Alternative/dp/0892819 251 Healing is not a crime - huckstering stuff that cannot work and can be dangerous for big bucks IS. If I was only going to read the wikipedia story, I would agree that Hoxley was a fraud. However, there are other sources. Find me an other source that says Hoxley did not die of cancer - complete with the death certificate showing some other cause. The fact that Hoxley himself died of cancer shows his treatment was ineffective. The same goes for Hulda Clark. And if you're going to say that some of Hoxley's ingredients were harmful, how to you explain chemo and radiation? Tu quoque fallacy. Nobody's claimed chemo is completely harmless, but it has been shown to have a beneficial effect, unlike Hoxley's quackery. I won't go into the rest of the healers you've looked up because it will be the same story --suppression of alternative cures to eliminate the competition. LOL. Run, carole, run. Don't look into anything, just stay the dumb believer that you are. The reality is that some of those "cures" are either useless or downright harmful, laetrile being a good example. I fully support prosecuting charlatans who peddle harmful "cures" to the gullible. Look up Ghadiali, btw. Maybe you like sexual predators, but I don't. He did 5 years in jail for violating the Mann Act. The case is Ghadiali v. United States, 9 Cir., 17 F.2d 236 "In 1925, when Ghadiali was on a lecture tour, he was arrested in Seattle and sentenced under the Mann Act to five years in the Atlanta Penitentiary. He later published a two-volume work, Railroading a Citizen, in which he blamed this unjust "persecution" on the medical trusts, the KKK, Catholics, Negroes, Henry Ford, the Department of Justice, and Great Britain. The book reprints the more sensational parts of the trial in which his teen-age secretary accuses him of rape, forcing her into "unnatural practices," and later performing an abortion. Ghadiali's purpose in reprinting this testimony is to allow himself a chance to interject comments accusing the girl of lying. Unfortunately, the impression left on the reader is that the girl was telling a straightforward story." - Gardner, Fads and Fallacies, 1957 -- The trouble with the World is that the stupid are so confident while the intelligent are full of doubt. -Bertrand Russell --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
On 9/9/10 10:04 AM, carole wrote:
wrote in message . 16.121... wrote in nd.com: "Outlawing books that tell me how to heal myself (such as Stale Food Versus Fresh Food) is racketeering activity. What the medical gangsters have done to Rife, Hoxsey, Gerson, Ivy, Durovic, Privitera, Krebs, Koch, Crane, Warner, Keller, Ghadiali, Beard, Taylor, Wright, Brodie, Naessens, Burzynski, Halstead, Richardson, Thurston, Pixley, Bolles and many others are great crimes, nearly invariably done in the name of "protecting the public." " Let's take a look of those "heroes" then. Rife's been already dealt with previously, so I won't post about him again. Hoxsey's herbal treatments include a paste of antimony, zinc and bloodroot, arsenic, sulfur, and talc for external treatments. There is also a liquid tonic of licorice, red clover, burdock root, Stillingia root, barberry, Cascara, prickly ash bark, buckthorn bark, and potassium iodide to be taken internally. The paste is very caustic and can burn or scar the skin. The liquid tonic can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anxiety, trembling, abdominal cramps and heart block. Moreover, red clover mimics estrogen, and would never be suitable for women with estrogen-responsive breast tumors. None of those have a known effect against cancer, and it's a matter of record that Hoxey himself died of the cancer his treatment failed to cure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoxsey_Therapy As noted previously, wikipedia isn't very reliable for anything that concerns establishment policy. The current policy is to support pharmaceutical treatments, which has been going on for a long time as there is big money involved. The current treatments have also been shown to work clinically. If you want to get the real story you need to read other sources such as http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#hoxsey and reviews at http://www.amazon.com/When-Healing-B.../dp/0892819251 If I was only going to read the wikipedia story, I would agree that Hoxley was a fraud. However, there are other sources. What other sources? References and evidence that it works, please. Alternative medicine really means unproven medicine. This certainly is the case with the Hoxley treatment. And if you're going to say that some of Hoxley's ingredients were harmful, how to you explain chemo and radiation? They work by killing cancerous cells. And, they have proven tract records. Modern medicine (including surgery) cures about 80% of kids with cancer. I won't go into the rest of the healers you've looked up because it will be the same story --suppression of alternative cures to eliminate the competition. You've got the wrong words in the last sentence: "cures" is inappropriate because those treatments don't work; competition is also inappropriate - a better phrase would be "unproven treatments that don't work and waste people's time and resources." Jeff carole www.conspiracee.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BOSTON, MA -- Psychotropic Medications Overprescribed in Foster-Care | fx | Spanking | 0 | November 2nd 07 07:13 AM |
BOSTON, MA -- Psychotropic Medications Overprescribed in Foster-Care | fx | Foster Parents | 0 | November 2nd 07 07:13 AM |
if you take prescription drugs, you need to read | [email protected] | General | 0 | February 20th 07 12:31 AM |
Are Parents Increasing The Need For Psychotropic Drugs? | Jan Drew | Kids Health | 0 | September 19th 06 06:40 AM |
2/3 Fosters TX on psychotropic *chemical restraints* One on 17 | Fern5827 | Spanking | 0 | November 12th 04 03:38 PM |