If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Labor Takes Longer For Overweight And Obese Women, Study Finds
I have a BMI of 28. I'll be sure not to lose any weight before having any
more children, because with my three hour labours I might end up giving birth in a car! Thanks for the tip. -- Amy, Mum to Carlos born sleeping 20/11/02, & Ana born screaming 30/06/04 email: barton . souto @ clear . net . nz (join the dots!) http://www.babiesonline.com/babies/c/carlos2002/ "Guy Necologist" wrote in message ... Source: NIH/National Institute Of Child Health And Human Development Of The National Institutes Of Health Date: 2004-11-05 URL: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1103030549.htm Labor Takes Longer For Overweight And Obese Women, Study Finds Pregnant women who are overweight or obese progress through labor more slowly than do normal weight women, according to a study by researchers at the University of North Carolina and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Mum of Two" wrote in message ... I have a BMI of 28. I'll be sure not to lose any weight before having any more children, because with my three hour labours I might end up giving birth in a car! Thanks for the tip. Hey, don't knock it 'til you've tried it! JennP. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Nicky" wrote in message
... "Guy Necologist" wrote in message ... Source: NIH/National Institute Of Child Health And Human Development Of The National Institutes Of Health Date: 2004-11-05 URL: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1103030549.htm Labor Takes Longer For Overweight And Obese Women, Study Finds Maybe I should be grateful I was overweight with both - the first one took 6 hours, the second took 3 hours, from the first twinge to holding the product : ) We decided 2 was enough, as we lived an hour away from the maternity hospital.... Nicky. Yeah, me too. DS#1 took 5 1/2 hours. Still waiting to see if I'll find out with DS#2 or it's going to be a c/s (he's breech at 36 weeks - see my 36 week update post if interested). I guess if I weighed less, he would've squirted right on out! -- JennL DS 06/26/98 1 tiny angel 11/03 EDD December 4 2004 aka CatnipSlayer @ livin-it-up.net -- Leader of the Cult of Worshippers of BiPolar Long-Haired Sexy Anime Guys with Swords |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LOL! Though in my case of course, it would need to be a big car ;-)
-- Amy, Mum to Carlos born sleeping 20/11/02, & Ana born screaming 30/06/04 email: barton . souto @ clear . net . nz (join the dots!) http://www.babiesonline.com/babies/c/carlos2002/ "JennP" wrote in message news:sv8jd.372420$D%.73134@attbi_s51... "Mum of Two" wrote in message ... I have a BMI of 28. I'll be sure not to lose any weight before having any more children, because with my three hour labours I might end up giving birth in a car! Thanks for the tip. Hey, don't knock it 'til you've tried it! JennP. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Kazh" wrote in message ... Birth 1 - Weighing 140lb - 24 hours Birth 2 - Weighting 210lb - 9 hours Birth 3 - Weighing 230lb - 7 hours I think the rule DOESN'T apply to me !! It sounds like a load of crap to me, that one factor alone like that is going to make the difference. I think you have to look at positioning for labour and delivery, not meaning to stir Todd up, but it seems stupid to put a large (and possibly unfit) woman on her back where she doesn't have gravity to help her. You know, I didn't even think of myself as fat until I read this stupid guy's post, and worked out I had a BMI of 28. I knew I was carrying a bit of extra baby-weight, but I didn't know I was borderline obese. -- Amy, Mum to Carlos born sleeping 20/11/02, & Ana born screaming 30/06/04 email: barton . souto @ clear . net . nz (join the dots!) http://www.babiesonline.com/babies/c/carlos2002/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
For me Birth 1 - Weighing 215 - A grand total of 7 hours and only 20
minutes of pushing That definately doesn't apply to me either. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Mum of Two" wrote in message ... "Kazh" wrote in message ... Birth 1 - Weighing 140lb - 24 hours Birth 2 - Weighting 210lb - 9 hours Birth 3 - Weighing 230lb - 7 hours I think the rule DOESN'T apply to me !! It sounds like a load of crap to me, that one factor alone like that is going to make the difference. I think you have to look at positioning for labour and delivery, not meaning to stir Todd up, but it seems stupid to put a large (and possibly unfit) woman on her back where she doesn't have gravity to help her. You know, I didn't even think of myself as fat until I read this stupid guy's post, and worked out I had a BMI of 28. I knew I was carrying a bit of extra baby-weight, but I didn't know I was borderline obese. Also, if a woman is already pretty heavy and relatively inactive, plus weight gained in pregnancy, this seems that it might correlate to being less willing and able to get up and move around during labor, which would tend to prolong labor. -- Amy, Mum to Carlos born sleeping 20/11/02, & Ana born screaming 30/06/04 email: barton . souto @ clear . net . nz (join the dots!) http://www.babiesonline.com/babies/c/carlos2002/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"JennP" wrote in message news:sv8jd.372420$D%.73134@attbi_s51... "Mum of Two" wrote in message ... I have a BMI of 28. I'll be sure not to lose any weight before having any more children, because with my three hour labours I might end up giving birth in a car! Thanks for the tip. Hey, don't knock it 'til you've tried it! only if I can do it infront of the hospital Kay JennP. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Kaybee" wrote in message ... only if I can do it infront of the hospital Kay LOL. Are you saying I cheated? JennP. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
It sounds like a load of crap to me, that one factor alone like that is going to make the difference. I think you have to look at positioning for labour and delivery, not meaning to stir Todd up, but it seems stupid to put a large (and possibly unfit) woman on her back where she doesn't have gravity to help her. You know, I didn't even think of myself as fat until I read this stupid guy's post, and worked out I had a BMI of 28. I knew I was carrying a bit of extra baby-weight, but I didn't know I was borderline obese. Also, if a woman is already pretty heavy and relatively inactive, plus weight gained in pregnancy, this seems that it might correlate to being less willing and able to get up and move around during labor, which would tend to prolong labor. This is my one and only concern about weight in pregnancy for me. It is DEFINITELY contributing to my mobility difficulty, although the pubic separation pain is probably more the issue. But it's *tiring* to move around a whole lot right now, and I know that I'm going to have to get to the point where I can walk without sending my heartrate through the roof. (My blood pressure is fantastic. My heartrate is not.) Jenrose |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UN FAO & WHO approve Steviol glycosides as sweetener June 2004, imports to UK no longer blocked: Martini: Murray 2004.10.17 rmforall | Rich Murray | Kids Health | 11 | November 3rd 04 06:26 PM |
Arteries Already Stiff in Obese 7-Year-Olds - Study | Roman Bystrianyk | Kids Health | 1 | September 28th 04 11:31 PM |
Low hormone in obese women linked to cutoff in breast-feeding | Jacqui | Pregnancy | 8 | July 29th 04 03:23 AM |
Obese Women | LV | Pregnancy | 0 | February 27th 04 01:49 AM |