The Flu vaccine is worthless and damaging

Lee J. Moore wrote in message
...
But then that's why Godwin's law exists. Too many people on Usenet are
ready to wheel out Hitler whenever they're without suitable retort.

No. Godwin formulated his law in the same way a natural law would be
formulated. It says :

Godwin's Law: prov. [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the
probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There
is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over,
and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was
in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an
upper bound on thread length in those groups.

source: http://www.science.uva.nl/~mes/jargon/g/godwinslaw.html

From this it is clear that Godwin merely formulated a 'natural' law, and in
some groups this is taken as the point at which the thread ends. Just though
I'd be pedantic :-)

--

Robert Bronsing

Can't you see?
It all makes perfect sense,
expressed in dollars and cents, pounds, shillings and pence

(R. Waters)

"Bronsing" wrote in message
...



Lee J. Moore wrote in message
...
But then that's why Godwin's law exists. Too many people on Usenet are
ready to wheel out Hitler whenever they're without suitable retort.

No. Godwin formulated his law in the same way a natural law would be
formulated. It says :

Godwin's Law: prov. [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the
probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
There
is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over,
and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument
was
in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an
upper bound on thread length in those groups.

source: http://www.science.uva.nl/~mes/jargon/g/godwinslaw.html

From this it is clear that Godwin merely formulated a 'natural' law, and
in
some groups this is taken as the point at which the thread ends. Just
though
I'd be pedantic :-)

I can out-pedantic you!

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...9421%40eff.org

Straight from the horse's keyboard!

"Marko Proberto" schreef in bericht
news

"Bronsing" wrote in message
...



Lee J. Moore wrote in message
...
But then that's why Godwin's law exists. Too many people on Usenet
are
ready to wheel out Hitler whenever they're without suitable retort.

No. Godwin formulated his law in the same way a natural law would be
formulated. It says :

Godwin's Law: prov. [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the
probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."
There
is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is
over,
and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument
was
in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of
an
upper bound on thread length in those groups.

source: http://www.science.uva.nl/~mes/jargon/g/godwinslaw.html

From this it is clear that Godwin merely formulated a 'natural' law, and
in
some groups this is taken as the point at which the thread ends. Just
though
I'd be pedantic :-)

I can out-pedantic you!

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...9421%40eff.org

Straight from the horse's keyboard!


All hail to the Pendantic of Pedantics! ;-)


--

Robert Bronsing

But that's okay, see the children bleed
It'll look great on the TV

"Marko Proberto" wrote in message
news
I can out-pedantic you!

Um, Mark, not to quibble or anything (never!), but that should be
"out-pedatize." g

"JG" wrote in message
. ..
"Marko Proberto" wrote in message
news

I can out-pedantic you!

Um, Mark, not to quibble or anything (never!), but that should be
"out-pedatize." g

Yikes! How utterly embarrassing! Before I lose my license to
pedantize, make that "out-pedantize." (Okay, who spilled sticky stuff
on the "n" key???)

"JG" wrote in message
. ..
"Marko Proberto" wrote in message
news
I can out-pedantic you!

Um, Mark, not to quibble or anything (never!), but that should be
"out-pedatize." g

Note deft manner where I return to the subject of m.k.h.

Does that have anything to do with pediatric medicine?

JG wrote:
"JG" wrote in message
. ..
"Marko Proberto" wrote in message
news

I can out-pedantic you!

Um, Mark, not to quibble or anything (never!), but that should be
"out-pedatize." g

Yikes! How utterly embarrassing! Before I lose my license to
pedantize, make that "out-pedantize." (Okay, who spilled sticky stuff
on the "n" key???)

Don't fret, I use the word "pedanticate" quite frequently :-)

"Jan" wrote in message
...
Subject: The Flu vaccine is worthless and damaging
From: Eric Bohlman
Date: 11/18/2003 5:03 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

(Jan) wrote in
:

You can't believe anything Mark says, I serious doubt his business is
big enough to donate that many computers, like his buddies, he most
likely made the whole thing up.

386 computers, my foot.

When a computer-literate person

ZZzz. Insult noted.

sees "386 computers" in the context in
which Mark wrote it, he or she immediately thinks "computers with Intel
80386 processor chips" which were commonly called "386s."

LOL. Sorry, you are completely wrong. When one see 386 computers, they
think
386 computers.

Ho wowoudl yuou know, since there is no evidcen that you think?

He doesn't think
"three hundred and eighty-six different computers." 386 computers used
to
be rather common items to donate; in fact I still see some of them at the
local thrift stores.

And???

Your point???

I see computer is thrift stores also. I also see a lie when it is a
whopper.

We are not talking fast food, but 80386 computers. You just are so desperate
to show people with whom you disagree are liars that you do not have a clue.



I repeat.


You can't believe anything Mark says, I serious doubt his business is
big enough to donate that many computers, like his buddies, he most
likely made the whole thing up.

386 computers, my foot.

You know Eric, I used to think you were one step above the others
debunkers,
with your recent posts, you have reduced to the bottom with them, anything
to
protect your buddies. You are getting absurd.

Actually, you have got to absurd, and with this one, passed it with the red
lights flashing.