Doan strikes ...... again! was Kids should work...

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:19:18 -0800, Doan wrote:

For you latecomers:

Doan seems to think "anti-spanking zealots" (you can tell us by our
white hats...R R R R) can't tell the difference between a beating and
a spanking. He says we are logic impaired. Of course he posts nothing
original as he drones on year after year, just the same garbage he
claims no one successfully challenges him on, when in fact he drones
them to death with is childish prattle.

So folks, will Doan come up with a scientific proof (as he demands of
others, with data and citations) of exactly where spanking becomes
abuse, a beating?

Or, will he choke?

Lay your bets before you scroll down...The Tree will hold the pot...
after all, could a Plant be dishonest?

So Doan, you think that spanking is not a form of beating. I think
that you have been asked a valid question:

Just what is the difference between spanking and beating?

It is based on the "reasonable person" standard.

Just where does the boundary lie?


It is where a "reasonable" person said it is. The is the same
question
in the 80's with regard to pornography. Where do draw the line?

Where a reasonable person does, of course, just as you say.

But you seem to have fallen a tad short on the criteria you demand of
others, have you not? Where is the data, the citations, the
authorities, the PROOF?


In other words, you have not really answered the question at all. Why
am I not bowled or with surprize?

You have posed two new questions. Neither of which you'll be able to
answer with anything but more questions.

Here they are for you:

1. What is a reasonable person?

Define reasonableness please, and this time follow the request of you
I made to meet your own demands...scientific proof please. You
weaseled this time and you will again of course.

2. What WOULD more than one "reasonable person" actually say the line
is?


Get five, see I make it easy...not to many in the sample, people you
think or can prove to yourself are reasonable.

Without them having access to each other, determine that they all
agree to what a spanking is and a beating is and more especially at
what point the lessor becomes the greater, abuse wise that is.

And please, if you EVER plan to be taken seriously again when you
demand scientific proof on the level of the evidence you offered by
the good medical doctor that is based on experimentation to be valid,
provide us with scientific proof NOW, bubbah.


Doan


One thing the self defined "clever" ALWAYS do, is step into their own
traps.

These ngs are full of them. They are outstanding in their clumsiness.

The problem isn't so much stupidity (which of course you have an ample
supply by way of the proof of you believing you are so clever) but
dishonesty.

To play their tricks they MUST LIE AND CHEAT and cut corners, and
weasel words, and avoid admitting when they have screwed themselves
publically.

So who yah gonna call, Ghostbusters?

Kane

And others may disagree with you! ;-)

Doan


I consider myself a reasonable person.

As a reasonable person, I think that more or less any form of violence
against children and child beating, is not reasonable and is child
abuse, at the very least when it is applied to toddlers.

i

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:19:18 -0800, Doan wrote:
So Doan, you think that spanking is not a form of beating. I think
that you have been asked a valid question:

Just what is the difference between spanking and beating?

It is based on the "reasonable person" standard.

Just where does the boundary lie?


It is where a "reasonable" person said it is. The is the same
question
in the 80's with regard to pornography. Where do draw the line?

On 3 Dec 2003, Kane wrote:

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:19:18 -0800, Doan wrote:

For you latecomers:

Listen to the public clown! ;-)

Doan seems to think "anti-spanking zealots" (you can tell us by our
white hats...R R R R) can't tell the difference between a beating and
a spanking.

So you can't you or can't tell the difference between a spanking and
a beating?

He says we are logic impaired.

Very true! :-)

Of course he posts nothing
original as he drones on year after year, just the same garbage he
claims no one successfully challenges him on, when in fact he drones
them to death with is childish prattle.

LOL! I cited my sources and logically defended my arguments. Sad thing
is I can't say that about you. In fact, the only thing you are good at
is calling other women "smelly-****"!

So folks, will Doan come up with a scientific proof (as he demands of
others, with data and citations) of exactly where spanking becomes
abuse, a beating?

I don't need to. You are welcome to make up your mind. Just don't force
others to follow your "beliefs". :-)

Or, will he choke?

Lay your bets before you scroll down...The Tree will hold the pot...
after all, could a Plant be dishonest?

LOL! You are a street clown! ;-0


So Doan, you think that spanking is not a form of beating. I think
that you have been asked a valid question:

Just what is the difference between spanking and beating?

It is based on the "reasonable person" standard.

Just where does the boundary lie?


It is where a "reasonable" person said it is. The is the same
question
in the 80's with regard to pornography. Where do draw the line?

Where a reasonable person does, of course, just as you say.

But you seem to have fallen a tad short on the criteria you demand of
others, have you not? Where is the data, the citations, the
authorities, the PROOF?

Proof of what??? That there are "reasonable" person????

In other words, you have not really answered the question at all. Why
am I not bowled or with surprize?

You have posed two new questions. Neither of which you'll be able to
answer with anything but more questions.

Here they are for you:

1. What is a reasonable person?

Define reasonableness please, and this time follow the request of you
I made to meet your own demands...scientific proof please. You
weaseled this time and you will again of course.

2. What WOULD more than one "reasonable person" actually say the line
is?


Get five, see I make it easy...not to many in the sample, people you
think or can prove to yourself are reasonable.

Without them having access to each other, determine that they all
agree to what a spanking is and a beating is and more especially at
what point the lessor becomes the greater, abuse wise that is.

And please, if you EVER plan to be taken seriously again when you
demand scientific proof on the level of the evidence you offered by
the good medical doctor that is based on experimentation to be valid,
provide us with scientific proof NOW, bubbah.

I guess there no "reasonable" person in the anti-spanking zealotS's world.
:-)


Doan


One thing the self defined "clever" ALWAYS do, is step into their own
traps.

These ngs are full of them. They are outstanding in their clumsiness.

The problem isn't so much stupidity (which of course you have an ample
supply by way of the proof of you believing you are so clever) but
dishonesty.

And you are the perfect example. :-)

To play their tricks they MUST LIE AND CHEAT and cut corners, and
weasel words, and avoid admitting when they have screwed themselves
publically.

You forgot to add puffering: I teach math at the college level; I am a
member of MENSA; I have a Ph.D; I am a computer expert.... ;-)

So who yah gonna call, Ghostbusters?

That's good one, Kane. It's one of my favorite movie. :-)

Doan

Kane