Doan hits another home run was Kids should work...

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:19:18 -0800, Doan wrote:



So Doan, you think that spanking is not a form of beating. I think
that you have been asked a valid question:

Just what is the difference between spanking and beating?

It is based on the "reasonable person" standard.

Just where does the boundary lie?

It is where a "reasonable" person said it is.

Where did the reasonable person say it was?

Is this anything like, "I don't know modern art but I know what I
like" kind of reasonableness?

The is the same question
in the 80's with regard to pornography. Where do draw the line?

Really? It is? Okay, tell us the scientifically supported definition
of pornography, or admit that there is no fixed definition of the line
between spanking and abuse, and you can include an apology for the
logic impairment remark about anti spanking zealots.

Seeing as you appear to suffer a bit of logic impairment yourself.

"reasonable person" R R R R ...Good'un, child, good'un.



Doan

Or, we can ask you to provide something more than a guess like yours,
something more in line with what you demand of others and won't accept
when presented even with scientific proof.

Or stop being an ass.

It's really entirely up to you and always has been.

Kane

On 4 Dec 2003, Kane wrote:

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:19:18 -0800, Doan wrote:



So Doan, you think that spanking is not a form of beating. I think
that you have been asked a valid question:

Just what is the difference between spanking and beating?

It is based on the "reasonable person" standard.

Just where does the boundary lie?

It is where a "reasonable" person said it is.

Where did the reasonable person say it was?

If you have to ask, you're not a "reasonable" person! ;-)

Is this anything like, "I don't know modern art but I know what I
like" kind of reasonableness?

The is the same question
in the 80's with regard to pornography. Where do draw the line?

Really? It is? Okay, tell us the scientifically supported definition
of pornography, or admit that there is no fixed definition of the line
between spanking and abuse, and you can include an apology for the
logic impairment remark about anti spanking zealots.

It's no use to stuff logic into the anti-spanking zealotS; they have no
common-sense. :-)

Seeing as you appear to suffer a bit of logic impairment yourself.

You don't see me turning into an anti-spanking zealotS yet! ;-)

"reasonable person" R R R R ...Good'un, child, good'un.

There is none in the anti-spanking zealotS' "dream" land! ;-)



Doan

Or, we can ask you to provide something more than a guess like yours,
something more in line with what you demand of others and won't accept
when presented even with scientific proof.

You meant 'cargo-cult' science! ;-)

Or stop being an ass.

That is where your mouth is?

It's really entirely up to you and always has been.

Kane

Certainly! :-)

Doan