U.S. Soldier's Death Is Tied To Vaccines

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s976330.htm

"john" wrote in message
om...

****.

Jan Drew will be VERY upset at your use of this word. It is disgusting and
inappropriate.

"Rich Shewmaker" wrote in message
...

"Marko Proberto" wrote in message
et...


snip

The woman received smallpox, typhoid, anthrax, hepatitis B and
measles-mumps-rubella vaccine on March 2. On April 4, she died of
lung
complications caused by an acute attack of the autoimmune disease
lupus.

She had never shown symptoms, but analysis of two blood samples
stored
in the military's 30-million-sample repository showed that she had
abnormalities associated with lupus as far back as 1998.

The vaccinations apparently triggered a first "flare" of lupus,
which
an Army official, Col. John D. Grabenstein, said has been observed a
few times in civilians. Neither panel cited a specific vaccine as
the

snip

Sadly, this soldier died. Even assuming that it was vaccine related, it
was
the result of an immune system reaction which could not have been
reasonably
foreseen, as she had lupus, which was undiagnosed.

Yes, one does wonder why the army physical did not pick up the
"abnormalities associated with lupus" in 1998 when the specimens were
processed. I wonder if this death will lead to changes in the labwork done
on incoming recruits.

I presume that the current testing protocol does not include several
diseases which are more common amongst certain groups since they may be
concerned with some form of "profiling."

I think it is tragic that the anti-vac liars will use her unfortunate
death
to promote thier ill conceived, and evil, agenda.

I always wonder what anti-vac people have to gain by preventing
vaccination.
Why do they do it? Is it just ill will toward science and conventional
medicine in general? Or is it genuine hatred of children of the world and
a
desire for more people to die of infectious disease?

Both is a reasonable choice. However, I suspect that there is a cult like
rejection of vaccination since it is science based, but not reducible to a
30 second sound bite.

Marko Proberto wrote:

"john" wrote in message
om...

****.

Jan Drew will be VERY upset at your use of this word. It is disgusting and
inappropriate.

I have a close freind who works in the PENTAGON and handles the Vaccine

problems for the Military...I'll ask him about this NEWEST Problem when I
see him..
Which Should be soon, Having gone through the initial shots long ago in
the MILITARY,
The NEW system really bothers me!! B-0b1

"B-Ob1" wrote in message
...


Marko Proberto wrote:

"john" wrote in message
om...

****.

Jan Drew will be VERY upset at your use of this word. It is disgusting
and
inappropriate.

I have a close freind who works in the PENTAGON and handles the
Vaccine
problems for the Military...I'll ask him about this NEWEST Problem
when I
see him..
Which Should be soon, Having gone through the initial shots long ago
in
the MILITARY,
The NEW system really bothers me!! B-0b1

What about the new system bothers you. When I was in service, we lined up
and got the shots. Today, they keep blood samples.

"Rich Shewmaker" wrote in message
...

She had never shown symptoms, but analysis of two blood samples
stored
in the military's 30-million-sample repository showed that she had
abnormalities associated with lupus as far back as 1998.


Yes, one does wonder why the army physical did not pick up the
"abnormalities associated with lupus" in 1998 when the specimens were
processed. I wonder if this death will lead to changes in the labwork done
on incoming recruits.

It says she had never had any symptoms. Are there any other unusual diseases
you would like to routinely screen for in healthy asymptomatic recruits?

She was brewing lupus for some time before the shots. I don't see how anyone
can tell i the vaccines triggered it or if it was just a coincidence. Even
if the abnormalities were known, or if she was known to have full blown
lupus, it wouldn't have changed the decision to vaccinate her.

--
CBI

"CBI" wrote in message
link.net...


"Rich Shewmaker" wrote in message
...

She had never shown symptoms, but analysis of two blood samples
stored
in the military's 30-million-sample repository showed that she had
abnormalities associated with lupus as far back as 1998.


Yes, one does wonder why the army physical did not pick up the
"abnormalities associated with lupus" in 1998 when the specimens were
processed. I wonder if this death will lead to changes in the labwork
done
on incoming recruits.

It says she had never had any symptoms. Are there any other unusual
diseases
you would like to routinely screen for in healthy asymptomatic recruits?

She was brewing lupus for some time before the shots. I don't see how
anyone
can tell i the vaccines triggered it or if it was just a coincidence. Even
if the abnormalities were known, or if she was known to have full blown
lupus, it wouldn't have changed the decision to vaccinate her.

Disagree. If it was known she had even latent lupus, she would have been
discharged and not vaccinated.

However, you do raise a good question: How far should medical screening go
when one is in the military? How much givernment prying and snooping into
one's medical history should there be? How far should the medical testing
go?