Bf benefits after first year?

Subject really says it all - what are the benefits of bf after the first
year?

Pretty much all the same as they are during the first year.
Breastmilk is a highly nutritious food for toddler. (Though, after the first
year, it is usually no longer adequate as a sole source of nutrition.)
Breastmilk contains immunities that help protect toddler from a variety of
illnesses now and in the future.
Breastfeeding provides a powerful emotional bond between mother and toddler and
an easy, effective source of comfort and security.
Extended breastfeeding increases the protective benefits for mom in areas such
as reduced risk of breast cancer.


And... when all is said and done, even if there were no benefits at all, there
are no real downsides either, so if mother and baby are still enjoying it, they
should continue. (And, converserly, if they are not enjoying it, the benefits
are not so great that the mother should feel she needs to force herself to
continue.)


Naomi
CAPPA Certified Lactation Educator

(either remove spamblock or change address to to e-mail
reply.)

"Clare L" wrote in message
...
Subject really says it all - what are the benefits of bf after the first
year?

Clare


Naomi hit all the big stuff, but one other reason I recently read in the
latest Mothering magazine. Apparently, BF beyond a year greatly reduces a
child's risk of obesity. Check out these stats:

Children BF for 3-5 months were more than a third less likely to be obese by
age 5 or 6.
Children BF for 6 months to a year were 43% less likely
Children BF beyond a child's first birthday were 72% less likely

I don't know much about the study (Mothering has all the references), but
isn't that a cool new reason to keep going?


--
Jodi
SAHM to Oliver (2 years, 5 months) & Arwen (3 months)

Breastmilk contains immunities that help protect toddler from a variety of
illnesses now and in the future.

Naomi, perhaps you or someone else here can clarify something for me.

I've heard, and it's really stuck with me, that at the age of 1, mom's milk
turns back into something near colostrum, at least nutrition-wise. Around the
age of 1 is when babies generally become toddlers, and they become much more
likely to interact with a wider variety of people/germs. Therefore, they get a
second round of "supermilk" at this age, to counter their growing independence.

Is there any research to back this up, or was I fed a line? I'd love to see
the facts, if they exist, but I haven't seen it in writing, that I can recall.

jennifer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Necromancer with a chaser of werewolf; a drink to make any vampire giddy."
Jean-Claude, Master Vampire
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"I hugged you until you were not frozen anymore."
~Dana Scully to Fox Mulder

jennifer wrote and I snipped:

Breastmilk contains immunities that help protect toddler from a variety of
illnesses now and in the future.

Naomi, perhaps you or someone else here can clarify something for me.

I've heard, and it's really stuck with me, that at the age of 1, mom's milk
turns back into something near colostrum, at least nutrition-wise. Around the
age of 1 is when babies generally become toddlers, and they become much more
likely to interact with a wider variety of people/germs. Therefore, they get a
second round of "supermilk" at this age, to counter their growing independence.

Is there any research to back this up, or was I fed a line? I'd love to see
the facts, if they exist, but I haven't seen it in writing, that I can recall.

I'm not Naomi, but I can tell you what I recall. That is that as the
toddler nurses fewer times during the day, the immunities in the milk
become more concentrated. So, it's not strictly age-related, nor is the
milk changing to colostrum. I guess it happens this way so that the
toddler who's more independent - coming in contact with additional germ
sources - and simultaneously eating more solids, can still have the
benefit of mom's immunities.

Hope someone can back me up on this,
-Patty, mom to Corinne [Mar-98] and Nathan [May-00]
and stepmom to Victoria [Apr-90]

I'm not Naomi, but I can tell you what I recall. That is that as the
toddler nurses fewer times during the day, the immunities in the milk
become more concentrated.

Ahhhhh, I see!

So, it's not strictly age-related, nor is the
milk changing to colostrum.

I thought that is what I'd heard, but I've always been a little unclear about
it, which is why I figured this would be the perfect time to ask. I'm sure I
just misunderstood!

I guess it happens this way so that the
toddler who's more independent - coming in contact with additional germ
sources - and simultaneously eating more solids, can still have the
benefit of mom's immunities.

Okay, this makes sense.

Hope someone can back me up on this,

Thanks, Patty!

jennifer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Necromancer with a chaser of werewolf; a drink to make any vampire giddy."
Jean-Claude, Master Vampire
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"I hugged you until you were not frozen anymore."
~Dana Scully to Fox Mulder

Clare L writes:
: Subject really says it all - what are the benefits of bf after the first
: year?

Appropriate source of fat for brain development during the period when a
high-fat diet is needed.

--Helen

Breastfeed a Toddler—Why on Earth?
Written by Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC


Because more and more women are now breastfeeding their babies, more and more
are also finding that they enjoy breastfeeding enough to want to continue
longer than the usual few months they initially thought they would do it.
UNICEF has long encouraged breastfeeding for two years and longer, and the
American Academy of Pediatrics is now on record as encouraging mothers to nurse
at least one year and as long after as both mother and baby desire.
Breastfeeding to 3 and 4 years of age has been common in much of the world
until recently, and breastfeeding toddlers is still common in many societies.

Why should breastfeeding continue past six months?
Because mothers and babies often enjoy breastfeeding a lot. Why stop an
enjoyable relationship?

But it is said that breastmilk has no value after six months.
Perhaps this is said, but it is wrong. That anyone can say such a thing only
shows how ignorant so many people in our society are about breastfeeding.
Breastmilk is, after all, milk. Even after six months, it still contains
protein, fat, and other nutritionally important and appropriate elements which
babies and children need. Breastmilk still contains immunologic factors which
help protect the baby. In fact, some immune factors in breastmilk which protect
the baby against infection are present in greater amounts in the second year of
life than in the first. This is, of course as it should be, since children
older than a year are generally exposed to more infection. Breastmilk still
contains factors which help the immune system to mature, and which help the
brain, gut, and other organs to develop and mature.

It has been well shown that children in daycare who are still breastfeeding
have far fewer and less severe infections than the children who are not
breastfeeding. The mother thus loses less work time if she continues nursing
her baby once she is back at her paid work.

It is interesting that formula company marketing pushes the use of formula (a
rather imperfect copy of the real thing) for a year, yet implies that
breastmilk (from which the imperfect copy is copied) is only worthwhile for 6
months. Too many health professionals have taken up the refrain.

I have heard that the immunologic factors prevent the baby from developing his
own immunity if I breastfeed past six months.
This is untrue; in fact, this is absurd. It is unbelievable how so many people
in our society twist around the advantages of breastfeeding and turn them into
disadvantages. We give babies immunizations so that they are able to defend
themselves against the real infection. Breastmilk also allows the baby to be
fight off infections. When the baby fights off these infections, he becomes
immune. Naturally.

But I want my baby to become independent.
And breastfeeding makes the toddler dependent? Don’t believe it. The child
who breastfeeds until he weans himself (usually from 2 to 4 years), is
generally more independent, and, perhaps more importantly, more secure in his
independence. He has received comfort and security from the breast, until he is
ready to make the step himself to stop. And when he makes that step himself, he
knows he has achieved something, he knows he has moved ahead. It is a milestone
in his life.

Often we push children to become "independent" too quickly. To sleep alone too
soon, to wean from the breast too soon, to do without their parents too soon,
to do everything too soon. Don’t push and the child will become independent
soon enough. What’s the rush? Soon they will be leaving home. You want them
to leave home at 14?

Of course, breastfeeding can, in some situations, be used to foster an
overdependent relationship. But so can food and toilet training. The problem is
not the breastfeeding. This is another issue.

What else?
Possibly the most important aspect of nursing a toddler is not the nutritional
or immunologic benefits, important as they are. I believe the most important
aspect of nursing a toddler is the special relationship between child and
mother. Breastfeeding is a life affirming act of love. This continues when the
baby becomes a toddler. Anyone without prejudices, who has ever observed an
older baby or toddler nursing can testify that there is something almost
magical, something special, something far beyond food going on. A nursing
toddler will sometimes spontaneously break into laughter for no obvious reason.
His delight in the breast goes far beyond a source of food. And if the mother
allows herself, breastfeeding becomes a source of delight for her as well, far
beyond the pleasure of providing food. Of course, it’s not always great, but
what is? But when it is, it makes it all so worthwhile.

And if the child does become ill or does get hurt (and they do as they meet
other children and become more daring), what easier way to comfort the child
than breastfeeding? I remember nights in the emergency department when mothers
would walk their ill, non nursing babies or toddlers up and down the halls
trying, often unsuccessfully, to console them, while the nursing mothers were
sitting quietly with their comforted, if not necessarily happy, babies at the
breast. The mother comforts the sick child with breastfeeding, and the child
comforts the mother by breastfeeding.



This article may be copied and distributed without further permission


Handout #21. Toddler nursing. January 1998


About the Author
JACK NEWMAN graduated from the University of Toronto medical school as a
pediatrician in 1970. He started the first hospital-based breastfeeding clinic
in Canada in 1984 at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children. He has been a
consultant with UNICEF for the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative in Africa, and
has published articles on the subject of breastfeeding in Scientific American
and several medical journals. Dr. Newman has practiced as a physician in
Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa.


If you would like to contact Dr. Newman, you can mail him at:




Karen Ann
Mommy to:
Ashley 11-13-90
Meghan 3-10-97
Hayley "Chunky Monkey" 3-27-03

I'm not Naomi, but I can tell you what I recall. That is that as the
toddler nurses fewer times during the day, the immunities in the milk
become more concentrated.

That's basically what I recall too. (I'm not seeing my copy of "Breastfeeding
and Human Lacation" floating around here just now, or I'd look it up.) More
immunities per liter, since the toddler tends to be getting less milk, and is
bigger and so needs more of them for his larger bodyweight.


Naomi
CAPPA Certified Lactation Educator

(either remove spamblock or change address to to e-mail
reply.)

In article , "Clare L"
wrote:

Subject really says it all - what are the benefits of bf after the first
year?

Lots of people have given the health benefits, but one great benefit I have
found is that I have an instant source of comfort and strength for DS. If he
feels uncomfortable, upset or is hurt, he has a slurp. It's a calming ritual
for him, and in many ways is what the Nice Cup of Tea is in my life. He also
uses bfing to reconnect to me after a day at day care -- again, much as I
would sit down with a friend and a cup of tea. So bfing develops a function
that is beyond the nutritional -- it has become social.

While DS is of a very placid temperament, I think that the availability of
breast milk at difficult times has helped us to avoid some meltdowns etc.

IOW, it's an aid to parental sanity!

Secondly, another health benefit -- my cycles restarted 18 months after DS'
birth. This was not only a pleasant break, but helped me with my iron levels
(I haemorrhaged after DS' birth and was anaemic for about the next year --
imagine if I had been ffing! I'd probably still be anaemic!).

DS is 28 mo and still going strong!

--
Chookie -- Sydney, Australia
(Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply)

"...children should continue to be breastfed... for up to two years of age
or beyond." -- Innocenti Declaration, Florence, 1 August 1990

"hobbes" wrote in message
...

Naomi hit all the big stuff, but one other reason I recently read in the
latest Mothering magazine. Apparently, BF beyond a year greatly reduces a
child's risk of obesity. Check out these stats:

Children BF for 3-5 months were more than a third less likely to be obese
by
age 5 or 6.
Children BF for 6 months to a year were 43% less likely
Children BF beyond a child's first birthday were 72% less likely

I don't know much about the study (Mothering has all the references), but
isn't that a cool new reason to keep going?

Jodi--If it's not a bother, could you post the references some time? I
checked the magazine's website, but they only post selected articles from
the print mag. I've started building a little dossier on benefits of bf a
second year, for when it comes up (DS is now going on 5 months, but I like
to be prepared!). I always used to think I'd stop at one year, but the more
I learn about extended nursing, the more I'm inclined to do it (provided DS
wants to!).

Belphoebe