If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
When does the logical become illogical?
"When does the logical become illogical or vice versa?" was going to be
among my next questions. Logic, like crime, is relative. So is *common sense* and a host of other concepts. As proven by differing attitudes in Minnesota and Oklahoma, the logic of time and place also defines when spanking becomes abuse. (Geographically, less than 700 miles separates St. Paul from Oklahoma City and the drive time is about 12 hours in moderate traffic.) The dividing line for all of the above reside within a cultural context. Even science is a product of its day. The so-called *scientific method* of today is actually a byproduct of what, at the time, were believed to be the more serious studies of alchemy and the occult. It may also be the product of a bright mind poisoned by mercury. Systematic methodology merely proved more useful for the emerging notion of a mechanical universe than did the search for a universal panacea. Although science is a god these days, given enough time, our version of science will become a subject of study for that discipline we know as anthropology. *Modern science* will evoke the same curious wonderment we now reserve for the outrageous notion of serious minds studying alchemy. The concept of "Better living through chemistry" already seems quaint. *Laws* of science will be regarded for what they really a A desperate prayer by an elite clique that the universe contains a logic that can be understood by mankind. Whenever a relative small group within a society coalesces their beliefs and values into a systematic ideology, especially if its belief system is at odds mainstream thought, it becomes a subculture. These subcultures become fascinating, although often involuntary, subjects for study by sociologists and anthropologists once they lose status within the society. Religious fundamentalists are a prime example today. Whole volumes have been written on once ubiquitous Southern Baptists as a subculture. Books written on spin-off from the Enthusiasm Movement, from which Southern Baptists sprang, would fill a library. Even now, no-spanks make interesting subjects for study. Their often knee-jerk reactions to the slightest difference of opinion and a quasi-paranoid search for heretics are quite reminiscent of the splintering effect that wracked the religious fundamentalist movement. No-spanks' *spoiling for a fight* mentality is also evocative of the fundamentalist idea that, if they can just keep a fight going with somebody, they can win. The doctrinaire air of superiority is also remarkably similar. Those not subscribing to the tenets of the subculture's belief system are perceived *sinners* in need of *salvation* from some perceived damnation. For religious fundamentalists, it is the sinner's soul that is at stake; for no-spanks, it is the alleged reprobate's children. Both have a *broad is the road to hell* philosophy. Worse, they actually need to feed off of each other in order to survive. Because, like religious fundamentalists, no-spanks have closed minds that are impervious to any logic outside that approved by the subculture, they are not so much to be debated as to be understood within the context of the society that gave birth to the movement. Understanding is paramount since, if they ever achieve any degree of power, these extremist subcultures have a remarkable capacity for witch-hunts and inquisitions. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
When does the logical become illogical?
Opinions wrote:
"When does the logical become illogical or vice versa?" was going to be among my next questions. Logic, like crime, is relative. So is *common sense* and a host of other concepts. As proven by differing attitudes in Minnesota and Oklahoma, the logic of time and place also defines when spanking becomes abuse. (Geographically, less than 700 miles separates St. Paul from Oklahoma City and the drive time is about 12 hours in moderate traffic.) The dividing line for all of the above reside within a cultural context. That is why society has a concept called "governance." To deal with the differences in perception and bias. And no, the "logic of time and place" in regards to spanking is not the issue for a definition. Not when governance is enacted. And it will be, as it has been. Even science is a product of its day. The so-called *scientific method* of today is actually a byproduct of what, at the time, were believed to be the more serious studies of alchemy and the occult. A fit analogy for "spanking." It may also be the product of a bright mind poisoned by mercury. Scientific method? Systematic methodology merely proved more useful for the emerging notion of a mechanical universe than did the search for a universal panacea. Mindless babbling. Played with mercury a lot when you were a child, did you? Although science is a god these days, given enough time, our version of science will become a subject of study for that discipline we know as anthropology. *Modern science* will evoke the same curious wonderment we now reserve for the outrageous notion of serious minds studying alchemy. The concept of "Better living through chemistry" already seems quaint. *Laws* of science will be regarded for what they really a A desperate prayer by an elite clique that the universe contains a logic that can be understood by mankind. Launching into a lecture on intelligent design, or chaos theory? Whenever a relative small group within a society coalesces their beliefs and values into a systematic ideology, especially if its belief system is at odds mainstream thought, it becomes a subculture. Actually what we are finding as time passes is that the core group of believers in using pain to control and teach children becomes a smaller and smaller group feeling themselves more under attack. The most obvious evidence of this are rambling pointless and illogical babblings in defense of their position. These subcultures become fascinating, although often involuntary, subjects for study by sociologists and anthropologists once they lose status within the society. I don't doubt we will have historians and others looking back, in fact as we do even now, on societies that used horrendous abuses of children to control them. Religious fundamentalists are a prime example today. Whole volumes have been written on once ubiquitous Southern Baptists as a subculture. Books written on spin-off from the Enthusiasm Movement, from which Southern Baptists sprang, would fill a library. They are not the only fundamentalists. Even now, no-spanks make interesting subjects for study. Not nearly as much as the dying spanking enthusiasts and compulsives. Their often knee-jerk reactions to the slightest difference of opinion and a quasi-paranoid search for heretics are quite reminiscent of the splintering effect that wracked the religious fundamentalist movement. In other words you do not want to be challenged and this silliness is the best you could come up with assuming no one would see through you? No-spanks' *spoiling for a fight* mentality is also evocative of the fundamentalist idea that, if they can just keep a fight going with somebody, they can win. Couldn't have given a better description of the spanking apologists that have come and gone in this ng. So you believe that the best way to win this debate is to declare the other side has no moral standing, nor logical assumptions, hence their debate is based not on their logic and morals but only on a desire to win, am I correct? The doctrinaire air of superiority is also remarkably similar. Those not subscribing to the tenets of the subculture's belief system are perceived *sinners* in need of *salvation* from some perceived damnation. For religious fundamentalists, it is the sinner's soul that is at stake; for no-spanks, it is the alleged reprobate's children. Both have a *broad is the road to hell* philosophy. Worse, they actually need to feed off of each other in order to survive. Time and again the argument of the spankers that come to this ng has been a fundamentalist approach you just described. They postulate, even against evidence to the contrary, that unspanked children will turn out badly. Yet as spanking becomes less and less acceptable we see youth crime rates diminishing. And where crime is more rampant spanking, geographically 0:- is more accepted. Because, like religious fundamentalists, no-spanks have closed minds that are impervious to any logic outside that approved by the subculture, they are not so much to be debated as to be understood within the context of the society that gave birth to the movement. The society that gave birth to the concept of not using pain and humiliation on children is the one you speak from. They did not come from outside, another planet, another nation, but this one. Understanding is paramount since, if they ever achieve any degree of power, It's more than apparent that perfectly decent rational and ethical people are making logical as well as moral attacks on the child abusers of the world who disguise their abuse as "discipline." Otherwise you wouldn't be here saying what you are saying. these extremist subcultures Between hitting a child to control him and not hitting him, which would you say is the more extreme behavior? have a remarkable capacity for witch-hunts and inquisitions. Reading the strange and sometimes factually incorrect diatribes of the "medicine men" and various shamans of the spanking brotherhood shows the witch-hunt mentally clearly. The "inquisition" comment I find interesting though, since your debate consists almost entirely of the inquisitory. I'm charmed with your cleverness, but not the least mislead. Quite an interesting bit of rambling though. Hardly qualifies as an "Opinion," or so I observe. 0:- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A sad birthday...and Dr. Hollands' 'logical medical thought'... | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 1 | January 18th 05 08:50 PM |
Olive oil in vagina? (Vaginal dilatation 'illogical' cause of pelvic floor damage) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | May 27th 04 04:30 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | General | 13 | December 10th 03 02:30 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |