If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#501
|
|||
|
|||
She's Baack /Was "Child Support" money?
In article , Quedar de encargo
says... "Gini52" wrote in message ... In article , Quedar de encargo says... "Gini52" wrote ........................ And you......what are you gonna try and say next that I am trying to disguise myself? Nice try!! LOL.........You are sooo predictable. ==== Hmmm...Interesting that you thought that from my comment. Seems like it could have had lots of meaning. And how is it that you know I'm "predictable?" Perhaps you know I can predictably identify scanmmers? === === LOL............."Scanmmers?" Did you make up that word yourself? John === Look where Quedar's posting from folks: "az-yuma3a-144.yumaaz.adelphia.net" Damn, I guess I am predictable. So Crystal, where ya been? === === What did I tell ya!! === Hey, I got that one in record time. Seems like you're just as predictable as I am. === === John |
#502
|
|||
|
|||
She's Baack /Was "Child Support" money?
In article , Quedar de encargo
says... "Gini52" wrote in message ... In article , Quedar de encargo says... "Gini52" wrote ........................ And you......what are you gonna try and say next that I am trying to disguise myself? Nice try!! LOL.........You are sooo predictable. ==== Hmmm...Interesting that you thought that from my comment. Seems like it could have had lots of meaning. And how is it that you know I'm "predictable?" Perhaps you know I can predictably identify scanmmers? === === LOL............."Scanmmers?" Did you make up that word yourself? John === Look where Quedar's posting from folks: "az-yuma3a-144.yumaaz.adelphia.net" Damn, I guess I am predictable. So Crystal, where ya been? === === What did I tell ya!! === Hey, I got that one in record time. Seems like you're just as predictable as I am. === === John |
#503
|
|||
|
|||
She's Baack /Was "Child Support" money?
"Paul Fritz" wrote in message ... "Gini52" wrote in message ... In article , Quedar de encargo says... "Gini52" wrote ........................ And you......what are you gonna try and say next that I am trying to disguise myself? Nice try!! LOL.........You are sooo predictable. ==== Hmmm...Interesting that you thought that from my comment. Seems like it could have had lots of meaning. And how is it that you know I'm "predictable?" Perhaps you know I can predictably identify scanmmers? === === LOL............."Scanmmers?" Did you make up that word yourself? John === Look where Quedar's posting from folks: "az-yuma3a-144.yumaaz.adelphia.net" Damn, I guess I am predictable. Just 'good' lol Oh my you all need to get out more! How is she good? Because she can read? Was it supposed to be a secret to where I am posting from? Because I never thought that it was and I never tried to make it one. But on the other hand Gini you got nothing better to do then make it seem that way. That's okay I understand..........ScaNmmer. LOL! John So Crystal, where ya been? === === Well I don't know how she has been but I have been good. Unlike the rest of you I've been living life, got married and I have a son on the way. |
#504
|
|||
|
|||
She's Baack /Was "Child Support" money?
"Paul Fritz" wrote in message ... "Gini52" wrote in message ... In article , Quedar de encargo says... "Gini52" wrote ........................ And you......what are you gonna try and say next that I am trying to disguise myself? Nice try!! LOL.........You are sooo predictable. ==== Hmmm...Interesting that you thought that from my comment. Seems like it could have had lots of meaning. And how is it that you know I'm "predictable?" Perhaps you know I can predictably identify scanmmers? === === LOL............."Scanmmers?" Did you make up that word yourself? John === Look where Quedar's posting from folks: "az-yuma3a-144.yumaaz.adelphia.net" Damn, I guess I am predictable. Just 'good' lol Oh my you all need to get out more! How is she good? Because she can read? Was it supposed to be a secret to where I am posting from? Because I never thought that it was and I never tried to make it one. But on the other hand Gini you got nothing better to do then make it seem that way. That's okay I understand..........ScaNmmer. LOL! John So Crystal, where ya been? === === Well I don't know how she has been but I have been good. Unlike the rest of you I've been living life, got married and I have a son on the way. |
#505
|
|||
|
|||
She's Baack /Was "Child Support" money?
"Gini52" wrote in message ... In article , Quedar de encargo says... "Gini52" wrote in message ... In article , Quedar de encargo says... "Gini52" wrote ........................ And you......what are you gonna try and say next that I am trying to disguise myself? Nice try!! LOL.........You are sooo predictable. ==== Hmmm...Interesting that you thought that from my comment. Seems like it could have had lots of meaning. And how is it that you know I'm "predictable?" Perhaps you know I can predictably identify scanmmers? === === LOL............."Scanmmers?" Did you make up that word yourself? John === Look where Quedar's posting from folks: "az-yuma3a-144.yumaaz.adelphia.net" Damn, I guess I am predictable. So Crystal, where ya been? === === What did I tell ya!! === Hey, I got that one in record time. Seems like you're just as predictable as I am. === === Pobrecita.........are you okay? John John |
#506
|
|||
|
|||
She's Baack /Was "Child Support" money?
"Gini52" wrote in message ... In article , Quedar de encargo says... "Gini52" wrote in message ... In article , Quedar de encargo says... "Gini52" wrote ........................ And you......what are you gonna try and say next that I am trying to disguise myself? Nice try!! LOL.........You are sooo predictable. ==== Hmmm...Interesting that you thought that from my comment. Seems like it could have had lots of meaning. And how is it that you know I'm "predictable?" Perhaps you know I can predictably identify scanmmers? === === LOL............."Scanmmers?" Did you make up that word yourself? John === Look where Quedar's posting from folks: "az-yuma3a-144.yumaaz.adelphia.net" Damn, I guess I am predictable. So Crystal, where ya been? === === What did I tell ya!! === Hey, I got that one in record time. Seems like you're just as predictable as I am. === === Pobrecita.........are you okay? John John |
#507
|
|||
|
|||
"Child Support" money?
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ink.net... "Cameron Stevens" wrote in message .. . It's ok for the CP to live in the 3000sq ft. house while the NCP is in that apartment. If the father can show he wants to be a CP (~ 50/50) then the courts should be supporting this. So let's say the CP's new "interest" is the man she left you for and she is living in the 3,000 square foot house that used to be yours. You are paying her CS so she and your children can live with the guy who helped destroy your marriage. Your CS is funding a wonderful life for her with her new love "interest." You have been kicked out of your prior home and now live in a one bedroom apartment. You rarely see your children, and have been relegated to a visitor in their lives. The guy who is living with your ex has more access to your children than you do. You also had to give her at least half of your assets and to help her get adjusted to being a single mother you are paying her alimony. Do you still think that is just her "good luck" and are you still happy about her new life? That scenario, which is not mine - but I will empathize, calls for a seperation of two things. What she did to break up the marriage has nothing to do with the justification or need for CS. The idea that you are prevented from being an active father to a visitor is deplorable and while there are legal paths to try to change that you're already broke from the CS you're paying and the courts are not friends to the NCP. It's not fair or right in the "BIG PICTURE" but... Child Support is not about who screwed up the relationship, etc. It is about parents being responsible financially. In this scenario there is a real lack of responsible behavior from the ex-wife as she is allowing a minimized amount of access to the children. Your only course of action, if you have joint custody and no legal restrictions (R.O.s), is to show up at the ex's home on a regular basis and do everything possible to ensure those children have every chance to see you (in this scenario) as the father. If they ever call "new-guy" (NG) "Dad" politely correct them. Kids only have one father. If you're actively involved in their lives then you are still "Dad". Alimony is not CS and should be considered seperately for the same reasons. Cameron |
#508
|
|||
|
|||
"Child Support" money?
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ink.net... "Cameron Stevens" wrote in message .. . It's ok for the CP to live in the 3000sq ft. house while the NCP is in that apartment. If the father can show he wants to be a CP (~ 50/50) then the courts should be supporting this. So let's say the CP's new "interest" is the man she left you for and she is living in the 3,000 square foot house that used to be yours. You are paying her CS so she and your children can live with the guy who helped destroy your marriage. Your CS is funding a wonderful life for her with her new love "interest." You have been kicked out of your prior home and now live in a one bedroom apartment. You rarely see your children, and have been relegated to a visitor in their lives. The guy who is living with your ex has more access to your children than you do. You also had to give her at least half of your assets and to help her get adjusted to being a single mother you are paying her alimony. Do you still think that is just her "good luck" and are you still happy about her new life? That scenario, which is not mine - but I will empathize, calls for a seperation of two things. What she did to break up the marriage has nothing to do with the justification or need for CS. The idea that you are prevented from being an active father to a visitor is deplorable and while there are legal paths to try to change that you're already broke from the CS you're paying and the courts are not friends to the NCP. It's not fair or right in the "BIG PICTURE" but... Child Support is not about who screwed up the relationship, etc. It is about parents being responsible financially. In this scenario there is a real lack of responsible behavior from the ex-wife as she is allowing a minimized amount of access to the children. Your only course of action, if you have joint custody and no legal restrictions (R.O.s), is to show up at the ex's home on a regular basis and do everything possible to ensure those children have every chance to see you (in this scenario) as the father. If they ever call "new-guy" (NG) "Dad" politely correct them. Kids only have one father. If you're actively involved in their lives then you are still "Dad". Alimony is not CS and should be considered seperately for the same reasons. Cameron |
#509
|
|||
|
|||
"Child Support" money?
"The Dave©" wrote in message
... Fighting For Kids wrote: Give me a break Dave, Is there ever a time when you dont turn something into a Man is the Victim crap. 18.43 a week? Thats ridiculous Show me the exact wording where I portrayed the man as a victim. Be specific. Be very specific. Also, are you saying that what she makes is irrelevant? In some places Dave, it is irrelevant... In Ontario, Canada (very coold place) the NCPs income is the only income considered. My ex made 80K and I made about the same (at one point). Her income was not a consideration. It was noted, but not a consideration. http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/su...l1_4/ont_b.pdf These tables indicate that that 18.43/week would put this NCP at a payscale of $10-12K in Ontario (dollar conversion considered). I don't feel you portrayed the man (NCP) as the victim but the systems we have are all FUBAR in so many different ways it's no wonder there's resentment of the ex in so many cases. Cameron |
#510
|
|||
|
|||
"Child Support" money?
"The Dave©" wrote in message
... Fighting For Kids wrote: Give me a break Dave, Is there ever a time when you dont turn something into a Man is the Victim crap. 18.43 a week? Thats ridiculous Show me the exact wording where I portrayed the man as a victim. Be specific. Be very specific. Also, are you saying that what she makes is irrelevant? In some places Dave, it is irrelevant... In Ontario, Canada (very coold place) the NCPs income is the only income considered. My ex made 80K and I made about the same (at one point). Her income was not a consideration. It was noted, but not a consideration. http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/su...l1_4/ont_b.pdf These tables indicate that that 18.43/week would put this NCP at a payscale of $10-12K in Ontario (dollar conversion considered). I don't feel you portrayed the man (NCP) as the victim but the systems we have are all FUBAR in so many different ways it's no wonder there's resentment of the ex in so many cases. Cameron |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | July 29th 04 05:16 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | February 16th 04 09:58 AM |
The Determination of Child Custody in the USA | Fighting for kids | Child Support | 21 | November 17th 03 01:35 AM |
So much for the claims about Sweden | Kane | Spanking | 10 | November 5th 03 06:31 AM |
Helping Your Child Be Healthy and Fit sX3#;WA@'U | John Smith | Kids Health | 0 | July 20th 03 04:50 AM |