A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Pregnancy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AP: 'world now has more fat people than hungry people...'



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 22nd 04, 11:48 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AP: 'world now has more fat people than hungry people...'

PREGNANT WOMEN: BY BREASTFEEDING YOU MAY BE ABLE TO HELP PREVENT CHILDHOOD
OBESITY...

See Nommsen-Rivers [May 2004] below.

ALSO LADIES - c-section is significantly associated with breastfeeding
problems in babies. See Dewey et al. [Sept 2003] below.

You can EASILY allow your birth canal to open an "extra" up to 30% at
delivery. See the very end of this post for simple instructions.


THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS TRYING MAKE IT EASIER FOR PEOPLE TO EAT
HEALTHIER AND EXERCISE MORE...

According to AP:

"...World Health Organization...options for heading off a worldwide
explosion in obesity...As the Western lifestyle...stepped up its invasion of
the developing world...[the UN health agency was]...direct[ed]...to come up
with a global strategy to help...figure out what to do...The world now has
more fat people than hungry people, and infectious diseases...are no longer
responsible for most of the world's deaths."
--Emma Ross (AP). WHO agrees on anti-obesity guidelines. The Oregonian.
(May22)2004:A9.

NOTE: "The non-binding agreement, expected to be formally approved by the
governing body of the World Health Organization, is a blueprint for
countries trying to develop policies that make it easier for people to eat
healthier and exercise more."


ARE BREASTFED BABIES EATING HEALTHIER *AND* PREVENTING OBESITY?

Maybe breastfeeding prevents obesity?
See Nommsen-Rivers L. More evidence of the protective effect of
breastfeeding against childhood obesity. J Hum Lact. 2004 May;20(2):255-6.
PubMed abstract (title only).

Copied to: Laurie Nommsen-Rivers, MS, IBCLC


Breastfed babies are DEFINITELY eating healthier and preventing infectious
diseases...

To make the breastfeeding rate skyrocket where it is low...

WHO should tell women the little known FACT that breastfeeding women scan
for pathogens and manufacture specific IMMUNIZATIONS which they "inject"
with their breasts DAILY.

The fact that the world's MDs aren't telling breastfeeding women this fact -
that they are daily immunizers (LITERALLY immunizers) - is particularly
strange because breastfeeding reportedly makes MD vaccinations work better.

The UN health agency should ask itself: What woman - explicitly informed
that she can IMMUNIZE her baby daily (and make MD vaccinations work
better) - is going to fail to at least ATTEMPT to immunize naturally
(breastfeeding) and unnaturally (vaccination)?

Just think: The world's MDs are missing an unprecedented opportunity to
increase the natural and unnatural immunization rates.

At the very least, we should increase the *natural* immunization rate
(breastfeeding).

BREASTFEEDING = CHIROPRACTIC IMMUNIZATION...

I would LOVE to call breastfeeding MEDICAL immunization too - but MDs are
lying by omission thereby
DENYING massive numbers of babies massive numbers of these free daily
immunizations!

It's mass immunologic child abuse/child neglect by MDs.

See Breastfeeding = Chiropractic immunization!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2014

MORE mass immunologic child abuse/child neglect by MDs...

In addition to failing to state the key fact that would most vigorously
promote free daily immunizations by mothers...

MDs are endangering vaccinated children by FRAUDULENTLY promoting MD
vaccinations.

As I recently wrote to Brian W. Vaszily the media contact for Mercola.com...
http://mercola.com/forms/contact.htm

You say it is your passion, your nature "to delve into issues..."
http://www.mercola.com/2003/jul/9/he...onsibility.htm

Please delve into state-sponsored mass immunologic child abuse/child
neglect.

Pharmaceutical organizations (and their MD puppets) have all 50 state
legislatures saying that, during disease outbreaks, vaccine-exempt children
are to be sent home (protected).

ODDLY, children not immunized by their vaccinations are left at school (not
protected)!

Pharmaceutical companies and their MD puppets are being allowed to claim IN
EFFECT that vaccination is 100% effective!

Parents must be informed: Vaccination is NOT immunization. Vaccinations do
not always immunize. Vaccination is ATTEMPTED immunization.

Since we don't check which children were weren't immunized by their
vaccinations, ALL children must go home during disease outbreaks.

We must stop endangering vaccinated children who were not immunized by their
vaccinations.

State "immunization" laws must be changed.

END Gastaldo's email to Brian W. Vaszily the media contact for

Mercola.com...

I haven't heard back from Brian yet. I will copy him again at:


AN IDEA...

Perhaps the World Health Organization (WHO) could help stimulate the United
States (all 50 states) to simply STOP state-sponsored, MD-mediated mass
immunologic child abuse/child neglect.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse/child neglect is perhaps
second only to mass PHYSICAL child abuse "performed" by MDs in all 50 states
and throughout the world...

I first started looking into MD-inflicted mass PHYSICAL child abuse when I
had the grave misfortune of discovering American MDs perpetuating phony
"babies can't feel pain" neurology to promote their most frequent surgical
behavior toward males...

See Various MD crimes (obvious ones)...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2541

Hopefully, the UN health agency will offer developed countries like the
United States a quick strategy to finally end the ongoing explosion of
MD-inflicted child abuse in America.

Making the breastfeeding rate skyrocket might just prevent obesity.

See again: Nommsen-Rivers L. More evidence of the protective effect of
breastfeeding against childhood obesity. J Hum Lact. 2004 May;20(2):255-6.
PubMed abstract.

Breastfed babies are definitely eating healthier...

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS1 CESAREAN SECTION AND BREASTFEEDING...

OBs are knowingly closing birth canals up to 30% - CAUSING cephalopelvic
disproportion then performing cesarean sections BEcause of cephalopelvic
disproportion.

This bizarre obstetric behavior - causing cesarean sections - may be
adversely impacting breastfeeding success...


According to Dewey et al. [2003]:

"...[Suboptimal infant breastfeeding behavior/SIBB] was significantly
associated with...cesarean section...Delayed onset of lactation (72
hours)...was associated with...cesarean section...[and]...stage II labor 1
hour...Excess [neonatal] weight loss...was associated with...long duration
of labor..."
--Kathryn G. Dewey, PhD et al.^^^. Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):607-19.
PubMed abstract

^^^Dewey KG, Nommsen-Rivers LA, Heinig MJ, Cohen RJ. Department of
Nutrition, University of California, Davis 95616-8669, USA.

Copied to Dewey et al. via


PS2 PROOF that OBs and CNMwives are routinely closing birth canals up to
30%...

First, the fact that semisitting and dorsal close the birth canal is simple
biomechanics.

See Gastaldo TD. Letter. Birth 1992;19(4):230.

Here's my source for the 30% figure...

"[T]he outlet increases with moulding by approximately 20-30 per cent."
--Russell JGB. Moulding of the pelvic outlet. J Obstet Gynaec Brit Cwlth
1969;76:817-20.

NOTE: In 1973, Ohlsen verified Russell's 20% figure on
Borell and Fernstrom's 1957 intrapartum x-rays. Ohlsen pointed out that the
authors of Williams Obstetrics were claiming that the pelvic diameters
*don't
change* during delivery (!) - so the authors of Williams Obstetrics decided
(erroneously) that dorsal delivery widens!

Interestingly, early last century, J. Whitridge Williams, MD, the original
author of Williams Obstetrics demonstrated MASSIVE amounts of change in
pelvic outlet diameter change at-term - and the just mentioned 1957
intrapartum x-ray study accorded with the average amount of pelvic outlet
diameter change Williams found clinically...

See:
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/part2ftc.html

Jason Gardosi, MD, director of the British National Health
Service/NHS West Midlands Perinatal
Institute/WMPI states the grisly biomechanics of the semirecumbent
delivery position (semisitting):

"...the weight of the mother is in part taken on the sacrum which is
therefore pushed upwards, thus decreasing the antero-posterior diameter of
the pelvic outlet..."
http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm

The funny thing is, Jason Gardosi, MD also *recommends* semisitting (closing
the birth canal) - or used to!

"The second stage...You might want to remain in bed with your back propped
up with pillows...As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..."
http://www.preg.info/book/chapter11.htm

NOTE: Jason Gardosi, MD and his fellow British OB pal Malcolm Griffiths once
got me censored from an international OB/GYN listserv - but fortunately not
before two of my posts were archived thereon:
http://forums.obgyn.net/forums/ob-gy...9707/0128.html
http://forums.obgyn.net/ob-gyn-l/OBGYNL.9707/0153.html

Anyone interested in some entertaining obstetric reading, check out Jason's
1989 Lancet "randomised controlled trial of squatting" - where nobody
squatted...

See Sarah Key's huge balls (also: Kids can SQUAT motionless for hours)...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2084

MORE PROOF According to the Merck Manual:

"When shoulder dystocia occurs...the mother's thighs are hyperflexed to
increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet..."
http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanu...er253/253g.jsp

WHY are OBs and CNMwives (nurse midwives) waiting until the
head is
out and shoulders get stuck before giving the baby maximum pelvic outlet
diameter?

WHY are OBs and CNMwives forcing babies' heads through birth canals
senselessly closed up to 30%?

WHY are OBs and CNMwives KEEPING birth canals closed when babies' shoulders
get stuck?

(Merely hyperflexing the thighs does NOT get the woman off her sacrum. This
is BAD McRoberts maneuver. ON A POSITIVE NOTE: Gardosi et al.'s WMPI site
(quoted above) recommends a version of GOOD McRoberts
if the shoulders get stuck...
http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm)

LADIES: HELP PROTECT YOUR VAGINAS...

OBs and CNMwives are slicing vaginas (euphemism "routine episiotomy") -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring everything possible is being done to OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%!

See Criminal medical CAM at Hawai'i's John A Burns School of
Medicine
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2256

Sorry to be repetitive but...

WEIRD: In 1993, the authors of Williams Obstetrics published the correct
biomechanics at my request but they left in their text (in the same
paragraph!) the "dorsal widens" bald lie that first called my attention to
their text.

The "dorsal widens" bald lie was created when Ohlsen informed the authors of
Williams Obstetrics in 1973 that they were still claiming that the pelvic
diameters *don't change* at delivery!

ALSO WEIRD: Before Ohlsen stimulated their "dorsal widens" bald lie, the
authors of Williams Obstetrics were ignoring Borell and Fernstrom's 1957
RADIOGRAPHIC demonstration that the diameters DO change - and this MANY
years after (way back in 1911) J. Whitridge Williams, MD - the first author
of Williams Obstetrics - clinically demonstrated 4cm of AP outlet diameter
change!

For details: See my Open Letter to FTC at:
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/part2ftc.html


SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS

PREGNANT WOMEN: It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the
"extra" up
to 30%.
Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on
hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc.

BUT BEWA "Midwives...encourage...semisitting." (closing the birth canal!)
--Yale CNMwifery Prof. Helen Varney. Varney's Midwifery. Sudbury, MA: Jones
and Bartlett. 4th ed. 2004:839]

Some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative"
delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close
your birth canal!) as you push your baby out!

If your baby's shoulders get stuck OBs and CNMwives will KEEP your birth
canal closed!

Yale CNMwifery Prof. Varney (just cited) writes:

"In the event of...shoulder dystocia...the woman should be
in a lithotomy position..." (p. 839)

Lithotomy position keeps the birth canal closed! So does semisitting!

Talk to your CNMwife or MD or MB about this TODAY. (For further details see
"Criminal medical CAM," URL above.)

CNMwives/MDs/MBs: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must - first
get the
woman off her sacrum - off her back/butt.

Again, those SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS...

PREGNANT WOMEN: It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the
"extra" up
to 30%.

Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on
hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc.

BUT BEWA "Midwives...encourage...semisitting." (closing the birth canal!)
--Yale CNMwifery Prof. Helen Varney. Varney's Midwifery. Sudbury, MA: Jones
and Bartlett. 4th ed. 2004:839]

And some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative"
delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close
your birth canal!) as you push your baby out!

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


Copied to: International Obesity Task Force Chairman Prof Philip James via
and via

This post will be archived for global access within 24 hours in the Google
usenet group archive. Search
http://groups.google.com for "AP: 'world now
has more fat people than hungry people...'"


  #2  
Old May 23rd 04, 05:37 AM
Wendy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AP: 'world now has more fat people than hungry people...'

This is getting a little redundant.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
misc.kids FAQ on Prenatal Testing - Overview and Personal Stories [email protected] Pregnancy 0 January 16th 04 09:16 AM
Kids should work... bobb General 108 December 15th 03 03:23 PM
(OT) THE ALMIGHTY EFF WORD toypup General 32 July 10th 03 06:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.