No-spank flagship sinking

American public schools were the designated flagship of the no-spank
movement. With their professional trained childcare staff, ostensively
in place to educate children in a scheme requiring *compulsory*
attendance, schools were a key linchpin in the no-spank movement. As
usually college educated females, teachers were in a position to bully
and intimidate the typical mother married right out of high school or
with a non-education degree. It was an advantage that no-spanks
utilized to great effect.

Schools would be aided and assisted by a feminist-dominated child
welfare Schutzstaffel, and other strategically placed no-spank
bureaucrats. Like teachers, feminists in child welfare were frequently
better educated than the mothers with whom they came in contact.
No-spank apologists in media were also enlisted to spread no-spank
propaganda. No-spank was always good; spanking was always bad. It was
the party line from hell.

The stage was set for people like William Penn Elementary School
principal Marlene Whitby. Despite her educational advantage and years
of experience, Whitby never bothered to look at an available school bus
video after one student accused another of stealing money. She never
took the time to talk to the school bus driver on whose bus 8-year-old
Katie White supposedly took $5 from another student. Instead, the
plump princess in her perfect no-spank kingdom dragged little Katie
from classroom to classroom in the school calling the innocent girl a
thief and a liar in front of other students.

While many other students realized the principal's actions were wrong,
Katie's sister kicked the 8-year-old out of their shared bedroom
because the principal said Katie was a thief and a liar. No teacher
came to Katie's defense during her needless humiliation. Many parents
were enraged. The Elizabeth Forward school district superintendent
laid low. The school board, headed by a minister, stonewalled. The
verbal abuse of a student was officially classified as a personnel
matter.

Katie's father, Ryan White, was officially helpless. Police were
useless since there is no law against verbal abuse. The brave new
world of no-spank had placed all the emphasis on physical violence and
conveniently ignored the damage caused by verbal abuse. It was not a
mere oversight since no-spanks are often verbally abusive. They needed
this blind spot in the law to perpetuate their agenda. That way,
verbally abusive no-spanks could and still can say nasty things about
parents without fear of recrimination. When compared to physical
abuse, psychological abuse gets a free ride in America.

After decades of being intimidated by schoolteachers in a compulsory
attendance scheme, parents began to understand how professional
no-spanks play the game. When the Elizabeth Forward school system
began to pretend nothing untoward happened to little Katie, parents
began to take matters in their own hands. They talked among
themselves. Then the parents besieged last Wednesday's school board
meeting. Nervous school officials called in the police to protect the
school board from the very people who elected them!

Finally, things got so hot for Whitby that the verbally abusive
principal resigned her cushy position before the end of the week. No
one arrested her. No one fired her. Although in technical violation
of a school system discipline policy, legally, Whitby had done nothing
wrong.

The good news is that parents are getting a good handle on the no-spank
game. Parents understand that, having provided no real alternative to
spanking, no-spanks are prone to often child-like verbal bullying of
both parent and child. They also realize that no-spanks don't have any
greater love for children than do their parents.

No-spanks simply don't like spanking. The agenda is not about
children; it's about what no-spanks want. Nothing more. That
realization doesn't exactly endear no-spanks to parents. That is one
reason why no-spanks have lost the home front and are only left with
schools as their battleground.

At the expense of a little girl, the parents in Elizabeth discovered
that the verbally abusive childcare professional at William Penn
Elementary School didn't really like children. Whitby didn't even have
enough for little Katie to administer any "discipline procedure
....[to]... teach respect for the dignity of individuals." Nor, even
after treating little Katie like a dog, did the verbally abusive
principal have the good sense to issue a public apology.

The inability of apologize is an almost universal characteristic of
no-spanks. Their egos are so fragile that they can never be wrong.
That is why, all too often, they have to hide behind educational and
related credentials. It gives them an air of superiority and makes it
easier for them to bully unsophisticated parents. When it comes to
children, no-spanks are often about as helpful as a pushy French waiter
in a fast-food restaurant. Like the verbally abuse principal, their
bullying tactics usually cause more difficulties than they solve.

Opinions wrote:

American public schools were the designated flagship of the no-spank
movement.

My lordy, opinions, do you know anything? Try reading "The History of
Childhood" by Llynd DeMause and "Centuries of Childhood" by Phbilippe
Aries. In fact, try reading.

With their professional trained childcare staff, ostensively
in place to educate children in a scheme requiring *compulsory*
attendance, schools were a key linchpin in the no-spank movement.

This is almost too stupid to deserve a response. What do you know about
the Fireside Movement, about Dame Schools, about early education? What
do you know about Luther, Comenius, Hall, Froebel, Calvin, etc.? What
do you know about the history of education? You spout lies after lies
after lies.

As
usually college educated females, teachers were in a position to bully
and intimidate the typical mother married right out of high school or
with a non-education degree. It was an advantage that no-spanks
utilized to great effect.

Another totallyt ignorant and uninformed "opinion" response, who bases
his/her popsts on opinion.

I'm not cutting the post below, because it is too humorous, and would be
hard to replicate. Thinking people will enjou the post.

By the way, I have an opinion that the earth is indeed, flat. And I
have an opinion that "bleeding"

Schools would be aided and assisted by a feminist-dominated child
welfare Schutzstaffel, and other strategically placed no-spank
bureaucrats. Like teachers, feminists in child welfare were frequently
better educated than the mothers with whom they came in contact.
No-spank apologists in media were also enlisted to spread no-spank
propaganda. No-spank was always good; spanking was always bad. It was
the party line from hell.

The stage was set for people like William Penn Elementary School
principal Marlene Whitby. Despite her educational advantage and years
of experience, Whitby never bothered to look at an available school bus
video after one student accused another of stealing money. She never
took the time to talk to the school bus driver on whose bus 8-year-old
Katie White supposedly took $5 from another student. Instead, the
plump princess in her perfect no-spank kingdom dragged little Katie
from classroom to classroom in the school calling the innocent girl a
thief and a liar in front of other students.

While many other students realized the principal's actions were wrong,
Katie's sister kicked the 8-year-old out of their shared bedroom
because the principal said Katie was a thief and a liar. No teacher
came to Katie's defense during her needless humiliation. Many parents
were enraged. The Elizabeth Forward school district superintendent
laid low. The school board, headed by a minister, stonewalled. The
verbal abuse of a student was officially classified as a personnel
matter.

Katie's father, Ryan White, was officially helpless. Police were
useless since there is no law against verbal abuse. The brave new
world of no-spank had placed all the emphasis on physical violence and
conveniently ignored the damage caused by verbal abuse. It was not a
mere oversight since no-spanks are often verbally abusive. They needed
this blind spot in the law to perpetuate their agenda. That way,
verbally abusive no-spanks could and still can say nasty things about
parents without fear of recrimination. When compared to physical
abuse, psychological abuse gets a free ride in America.

After decades of being intimidated by schoolteachers in a compulsory
attendance scheme, parents began to understand how professional
no-spanks play the game. When the Elizabeth Forward school system
began to pretend nothing untoward happened to little Katie, parents
began to take matters in their own hands. They talked among
themselves. Then the parents besieged last Wednesday's school board
meeting. Nervous school officials called in the police to protect the
school board from the very people who elected them!

Finally, things got so hot for Whitby that the verbally abusive
principal resigned her cushy position before the end of the week. No
one arrested her. No one fired her. Although in technical violation
of a school system discipline policy, legally, Whitby had done nothing
wrong.

The good news is that parents are getting a good handle on the no-spank
game. Parents understand that, having provided no real alternative to
spanking, no-spanks are prone to often child-like verbal bullying of
both parent and child. They also realize that no-spanks don't have any
greater love for children than do their parents.

No-spanks simply don't like spanking. The agenda is not about
children; it's about what no-spanks want. Nothing more. That
realization doesn't exactly endear no-spanks to parents. That is one
reason why no-spanks have lost the home front and are only left with
schools as their battleground.

At the expense of a little girl, the parents in Elizabeth discovered
that the verbally abusive childcare professional at William Penn
Elementary School didn't really like children. Whitby didn't even have
enough for little Katie to administer any "discipline procedure
...[to]... teach respect for the dignity of individuals." Nor, even
after treating little Katie like a dog, did the verbally abusive
principal have the good sense to issue a public apology.

The inability of apologize is an almost universal characteristic of
no-spanks. Their egos are so fragile that they can never be wrong.
That is why, all too often, they have to hide behind educational and
related credentials. It gives them an air of superiority and makes it
easier for them to bully unsophisticated parents. When it comes to
children, no-spanks are often about as helpful as a pushy French waiter
in a fast-food restaurant. Like the verbally abuse principal, their
bullying tactics usually cause more difficulties than they solve.