WHAT IS CHILD SUPPORT FOR

"JD Hoeye" wrote in message
...
PapaPolarbear stated non-coprehension:

I don't see how CS, the financial or parental responsibilities, have
anything
to do with marriage.

Papa


whether they do or not depends on ones position at to whether: genital
sexual
contact, fathering/mothering, parenting and supporting a child are
activities
properly reserved to, the product of, a marrage; wherein the marrage is
pre-requisite thereto.

if so, then they have everything to do with marrage.

if not, then they have nothing specificly connecting them with marrage.

to be specific however, financial/parental responsibilities have
everything to
do with marrage so long as the marrage exists as a functioning entity...
and
nothing to do with it once the functionality of a marrage ceases since at
that
point the marrage no longer exists no matter any legal state of existence
applies or not.

therefore, CS, financial or parental responsibilities do exist apart and
independent of the existance of a marrage...

a contradiction which appears to exist in spite of, and in the face of,
all
natural laws of nature and the almighty to the contrary because the
civilized,
modern, culture, of man presumes and has seen fit to superceed thier's
with our
own laws.

IMHO, that is.

Um, ya... Ok..

Child Support should not be factored based on the existance or non-existance
of a marriage to the CP. The laws around CS should be severed and separate
from this intracacies of a divorce.

I don't think you're disagreeing with this. but whatever you just said was
neither an argument or clarifying statement.

Papa

"JD Hoeye" wrote in message
...
PapaPolarbear stated non-coprehension:

I don't see how CS, the financial or parental responsibilities, have
anything
to do with marriage.

Papa


whether they do or not depends on ones position at to whether: genital
sexual
contact, fathering/mothering, parenting and supporting a child are
activities
properly reserved to, the product of, a marrage; wherein the marrage is
pre-requisite thereto.

if so, then they have everything to do with marrage.

if not, then they have nothing specificly connecting them with marrage.

to be specific however, financial/parental responsibilities have
everything to
do with marrage so long as the marrage exists as a functioning entity...
and
nothing to do with it once the functionality of a marrage ceases since at
that
point the marrage no longer exists no matter any legal state of existence
applies or not.

therefore, CS, financial or parental responsibilities do exist apart and
independent of the existance of a marrage...

a contradiction which appears to exist in spite of, and in the face of,
all
natural laws of nature and the almighty to the contrary because the
civilized,
modern, culture, of man presumes and has seen fit to superceed thier's
with our
own laws.

IMHO, that is.

Um, ya... Ok..

Child Support should not be factored based on the existance or non-existance
of a marriage to the CP. The laws around CS should be severed and separate
from this intracacies of a divorce.

I don't think you're disagreeing with this. but whatever you just said was
neither an argument or clarifying statement.

Papa

"JD Hoeye" wrote in message
...
PapaPolarbear stated non-coprehension:

I don't see how CS, the financial or parental responsibilities, have
anything
to do with marriage.

Papa


whether they do or not depends on ones position at to whether: genital
sexual
contact, fathering/mothering, parenting and supporting a child are
activities
properly reserved to, the product of, a marrage; wherein the marrage is
pre-requisite thereto.

if so, then they have everything to do with marrage.

if not, then they have nothing specificly connecting them with marrage.

to be specific however, financial/parental responsibilities have
everything to
do with marrage so long as the marrage exists as a functioning entity...
and
nothing to do with it once the functionality of a marrage ceases since at
that
point the marrage no longer exists no matter any legal state of existence
applies or not.

therefore, CS, financial or parental responsibilities do exist apart and
independent of the existance of a marrage...

a contradiction which appears to exist in spite of, and in the face of,
all
natural laws of nature and the almighty to the contrary because the
civilized,
modern, culture, of man presumes and has seen fit to superceed thier's
with our
own laws.

IMHO, that is.

Um, ya... Ok..

Child Support should not be factored based on the existance or non-existance
of a marriage to the CP. The laws around CS should be severed and separate
from this intracacies of a divorce.

I don't think you're disagreeing with this. but whatever you just said was
neither an argument or clarifying statement.

Papa