Who Is Fighting For Kids?

"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article , Fighting For Kids
says...

On 10 Nov 2003 10:29:28 -0800, Gini52 wrote:

In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that
prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her
here and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change.
She
can't.

This would imply that what comes out of your mouth is always right,
which ive obviously denomstrated before was wrong.
========
You are confusing your opinion with fact. Just because you say something
does
not make it valid. I even posted the relevent federal statute that defines
"home
state" and the quidelines for competing jurisdictions. You demonstrated
nothing
except that you can't extrapolate meaning from written text and that you
haven't
a clue about legal jurisdiction.
========
..........................................
When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes, it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is
an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

Really? Then how in the world did I ever make it to my current age if
I cant survive without it.
====
You were diagnosed as a child when you demonstrated the same qualities.
You have
done this all your life. You have never been able to engage in normal
social
interaction. You lash out at everyone and everything. You are incapable of
admitting error because your self-esteem is so low. You can only survive
psychologically by degrading others, giving you a false sense of
perfection.
You've been in therapy all your life without progress. You have engaged in
similar escapades with other newsgroups for years necessitating frequent
changes
in your user ID. Your illness is why your husband left you--not your
child's
illness--and that is why he refuses to have any contact with you. You also
knew
before you had children that there as a real risk of passing your illness
on to
them but you chose to have them anyway. That was an unfortunate decision
because
rather than give them a good role model to help them have a more stable
and
productive life, you have given them nothing but your self-perpetuating
anger
and incompetence. It is so sad for them that you have chosen to do this.
Hopefully they will thrive in spite of you (and hopefully they will never
learn
how to search usenet archives).
===
===

She had a similar experience with her father. Her own father could not cope
with the depth of her illness so he too walked away and abandoned her. As a
result, she hates all men. The state has stepped in to rescue her by
diagnosing her as being disabled making her former welfare benefits
permanent. That allows her to play her games on the computer all day long
to satisfy her need to put down men and make her feel superior to other
women. She has adopted the tenets of feminism because they reinforce her
belief that all men are bad. The feminist doctrine feeds right into her
areas of need by telling her it is okay to be a victim, and she is not
alone. Like other feminists she doesn't recognize that driving men away
makes their lives harder. She cannot come to grips with the fact having men
around to share in child rearing through increased access allows women to
improve themselves economically in marriage and post-divorce. And like
other feminists, she believes the pretzel logic that takes a small portion
of a few women's experiences and catastrophizes them as being representative
of all women's reality.

"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
nk.net...



She had a similar experience with her father. Her own father could not
cope
with the depth of her illness so he too walked away and abandoned her. As
a
result, she hates all men. The state has stepped in to rescue her by
diagnosing her as being disabled making her former welfare benefits
permanent. That allows her to play her games on the computer all day long
to satisfy her need to put down men and make her feel superior to other
women. She has adopted the tenets of feminism because they reinforce her
belief that all men are bad. The feminist doctrine feeds right into her
areas of need by telling her it is okay to be a victim, and she is not
alone. Like other feminists she doesn't recognize that driving men away
makes their lives harder. She cannot come to grips with the fact having
men
around to share in child rearing through increased access allows women to
improve themselves economically in marriage and post-divorce. And like
other feminists, she believes the pretzel logic that takes a small portion
of a few women's experiences and catastrophizes them as being
representative
of all women's reality.


If I didn't know better, I'd think you were talking about looney lorain

"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article , Paul Fritz says...


"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that
prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her
here
and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change.
She
can't. It is folly to attempt to counter her arguments. They are merely
words
she furiously types for the sole purpose of getting a reaction--fuel
for
her
psyche, if you will. When someone here reacts to her in the way she
hopes,
it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is
an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

And when the reaction is not what she hopes, the attackes get even more
hysterical
======
I wonder how many keyboards she's destroyed.

I am LMAO at how well you have her pegged.

Someone should keep a list of all the 'debate fatak errors" she has already
commited

snicker

======
======

===
===

nm

Ok, Paul or Ken or are you Bob?? hmm.... one really wonders.

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:26:47 -0500, "Paul Fritz"
wrote:


"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article , Paul Fritz says...


"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that
prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her
here
and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change.
She
can't. It is folly to attempt to counter her arguments. They are merely
words
she furiously types for the sole purpose of getting a reaction--fuel
for
her
psyche, if you will. When someone here reacts to her in the way she
hopes,
it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is
an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

And when the reaction is not what she hopes, the attackes get even more
hysterical
======
I wonder how many keyboards she's destroyed.

I am LMAO at how well you have her pegged.

Someone should keep a list of all the 'debate fatak errors" she has already
commited

snicker

======
======

===
===

nm

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:53:27 GMT, "Bob Whiteside"
wrote:


"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article , Fighting For Kids
says...

On 10 Nov 2003 10:29:28 -0800, Gini52 wrote:

In article ,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that
prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her
here and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not change.
She
can't.

This would imply that what comes out of your mouth is always right,
which ive obviously denomstrated before was wrong.
========
You are confusing your opinion with fact. Just because you say something
does
not make it valid. I even posted the relevent federal statute that defines
"home
state" and the quidelines for competing jurisdictions. You demonstrated
nothing
except that you can't extrapolate meaning from written text and that you
haven't
a clue about legal jurisdiction.
========
..........................................
When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes, it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It is
an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

Really? Then how in the world did I ever make it to my current age if
I cant survive without it.
====
You were diagnosed as a child when you demonstrated the same qualities.
You have
done this all your life. You have never been able to engage in normal
social
interaction. You lash out at everyone and everything. You are incapable of
admitting error because your self-esteem is so low. You can only survive
psychologically by degrading others, giving you a false sense of
perfection.
You've been in therapy all your life without progress. You have engaged in
similar escapades with other newsgroups for years necessitating frequent
changes
in your user ID. Your illness is why your husband left you--not your
child's
illness--and that is why he refuses to have any contact with you. You also
knew
before you had children that there as a real risk of passing your illness
on to
them but you chose to have them anyway. That was an unfortunate decision
because
rather than give them a good role model to help them have a more stable
and
productive life, you have given them nothing but your self-perpetuating
anger
and incompetence. It is so sad for them that you have chosen to do this.
Hopefully they will thrive in spite of you (and hopefully they will never
learn
how to search usenet archives).
===
===

She had a similar experience with her father. Her own father could not cope
with the depth of her illness so he too walked away and abandoned her. As a
result, she hates all men. The state has stepped in to rescue her by
diagnosing her as being disabled making her former welfare benefits
permanent. That allows her to play her games on the computer all day long
to satisfy her need to put down men and make her feel superior to other
women. She has adopted the tenets of feminism because they reinforce her
belief that all men are bad. The feminist doctrine feeds right into her
areas of need by telling her it is okay to be a victim, and she is not
alone. Like other feminists she doesn't recognize that driving men away
makes their lives harder. She cannot come to grips with the fact having men
around to share in child rearing through increased access allows women to
improve themselves economically in marriage and post-divorce. And like
other feminists, she believes the pretzel logic that takes a small portion
of a few women's experiences and catastrophizes them as being representative
of all women's reality.


blah blah.. sorry my father didnt abandoned me, like you did your
children. I dont hate all men, just you and your cronies.. oh and we
must not forget the deadbeats of America. Welfare benefits? Hardly,
you are more the type to be on Welfare. Play games on the computer
all day long? I dont think so. Feel superior to other women? Like
who Gini and teacher preacher? Ha, thats not very hard to do.
Feminism? Adopted some of their beliefs, but not all.
Victim? IM not the one claiming victim. Im doing very well without
my childrens father helping me out. If anyone plays victim here is
the deadbeats and the mens rights movement. Power is going going and
will soon be gone. Don't like the tables turned, huh?
Driving men away makes my life harder? **Cough**
Having a deadbeat around my children does nothing for my children nor
myself. I dont need someone who cant own up to their responsiblities
teaching my children anything, as far as helping me? Ha..thats funny.

The last sentence out of your mouth really cracks me up. Thats what
you cronies think, I have stated over and over that there are good and
bad parents and that SOME NCP's are deadbeats.

If anyone is using the small portion of experiences and then turns
them into everyone's experience that would be you cronies.

Ken? Bob? Paul? Harry? Joe?


On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:15:30 -0500, "Paul Fritz"
wrote:


"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
ink.net...



She had a similar experience with her father. Her own father could not
cope
with the depth of her illness so he too walked away and abandoned her. As
a
result, she hates all men. The state has stepped in to rescue her by
diagnosing her as being disabled making her former welfare benefits
permanent. That allows her to play her games on the computer all day long
to satisfy her need to put down men and make her feel superior to other
women. She has adopted the tenets of feminism because they reinforce her
belief that all men are bad. The feminist doctrine feeds right into her
areas of need by telling her it is okay to be a victim, and she is not
alone. Like other feminists she doesn't recognize that driving men away
makes their lives harder. She cannot come to grips with the fact having
men
around to share in child rearing through increased access allows women to
improve themselves economically in marriage and post-divorce. And like
other feminists, she believes the pretzel logic that takes a small portion
of a few women's experiences and catastrophizes them as being
representative
of all women's reality.


If I didn't know better, I'd think you were talking about looney lorain

FFK ...
On the whole, most contributors here have stated their case. They are
divorced, going through a divorce, or have questions and are here
seeking answers.

I went through a terrible divorce, but am now remarried to a wonderful
woman and have no CS probs now.

What's your story? I have an idea you're a female, with (about) a
$15,000 arrearage owing to you and/or your child.

Wanna comment on that?

Give us some background on yourself.

Maybe then we could understand your zeal. Otherwise, you're going to
seem like just a cranky troll.


nm

"Fighting For Kids" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:53:27 GMT, "Bob Whiteside"
wrote:


"Gini52" wrote in message
...
In article , Fighting For
Kids
says...

On 10 Nov 2003 10:29:28 -0800, Gini52 wrote:

In article
,
says...

My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS,
and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in
jail
first.

Am I close?
===
Probably. But, she also has severe psychological abnormalities that
prevent her
from having normal social interactions. No matter what is said to her
here and
no matter how many times folks go round with her, she will not
change.
She
can't.

This would imply that what comes out of your mouth is always right,
which ive obviously denomstrated before was wrong.
========
You are confusing your opinion with fact. Just because you say
something
does
not make it valid. I even posted the relevent federal statute that
defines
"home
state" and the quidelines for competing jurisdictions. You demonstrated
nothing
except that you can't extrapolate meaning from written text and that
you
haven't
a clue about legal jurisdiction.
========
..........................................
When someone here reacts to her in the way she hopes, it
serves to give her more energy for her subsequent round of fire. It
is
an
addiction for her--she cannot survive without it.

Really? Then how in the world did I ever make it to my current age if
I cant survive without it.
====
You were diagnosed as a child when you demonstrated the same qualities.
You have
done this all your life. You have never been able to engage in normal
social
interaction. You lash out at everyone and everything. You are incapable
of
admitting error because your self-esteem is so low. You can only
survive
psychologically by degrading others, giving you a false sense of
perfection.
You've been in therapy all your life without progress. You have engaged
in
similar escapades with other newsgroups for years necessitating
frequent
changes
in your user ID. Your illness is why your husband left you--not your
child's
illness--and that is why he refuses to have any contact with you. You
also
knew
before you had children that there as a real risk of passing your
illness
on to
them but you chose to have them anyway. That was an unfortunate
decision
because
rather than give them a good role model to help them have a more stable
and
productive life, you have given them nothing but your self-perpetuating
anger
and incompetence. It is so sad for them that you have chosen to do
this.
Hopefully they will thrive in spite of you (and hopefully they will
never
learn
how to search usenet archives).
===
===

She had a similar experience with her father. Her own father could not
cope
with the depth of her illness so he too walked away and abandoned her.
As a
result, she hates all men. The state has stepped in to rescue her by
diagnosing her as being disabled making her former welfare benefits
permanent. That allows her to play her games on the computer all day
long
to satisfy her need to put down men and make her feel superior to other
women. She has adopted the tenets of feminism because they reinforce her
belief that all men are bad. The feminist doctrine feeds right into her
areas of need by telling her it is okay to be a victim, and she is not
alone. Like other feminists she doesn't recognize that driving men away
makes their lives harder. She cannot come to grips with the fact having
men
around to share in child rearing through increased access allows women to
improve themselves economically in marriage and post-divorce. And like
other feminists, she believes the pretzel logic that takes a small
portion
of a few women's experiences and catastrophizes them as being
representative
of all women's reality.


blah blah.. sorry my father didnt abandoned me, like you did your
children. I dont hate all men, just you and your cronies.. oh and we
must not forget the deadbeats of America. Welfare benefits? Hardly,
you are more the type to be on Welfare. Play games on the computer
all day long? I dont think so. Feel superior to other women? Like
who Gini and teacher preacher? Ha, thats not very hard to do.
Feminism? Adopted some of their beliefs, but not all.
Victim? IM not the one claiming victim. Im doing very well without
my childrens father helping me out. If anyone plays victim here is
the deadbeats and the mens rights movement. Power is going going and
will soon be gone. Don't like the tables turned, huh?
Driving men away makes my life harder? **Cough**
Having a deadbeat around my children does nothing for my children nor
myself. I dont need someone who cant own up to their responsiblities
teaching my children anything, as far as helping me? Ha..thats funny.

The last sentence out of your mouth really cracks me up. Thats what
you cronies think, I have stated over and over that there are good and
bad parents and that SOME NCP's are deadbeats.

If anyone is using the small portion of experiences and then turns
them into everyone's experience that would be you cronies.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow!! I see punctuation! I see grammar in use!! I see you found your
spell checker too!!! Now if only you'd stay on your meds long enough for
them to have an effect on your poor, deluded mind there might be a change in
your thinking! (I know, I know, I'm really reaching, but there is always
hope...)

So FFK, my advise is NOT to sell your meds to the local drug dealer for cash
to buy yourself more smokes. Keep the meds for yourself, take them, that's
what they're there for.

Hello Jon,

Humm... let me see if I understand what you're saying...

We have FFK's X-hubby, who doesn't make enough money to cover his full CS
award AND keep a roof over his head nor food on the table, or gas in the
car. And your solution is to lock him up because he can't cover the cost of
all his obligations?

Is this correct?

"Jon" wrote in message
news:N4Vrb.165813$Fm2.144359@attbi_s04...
and I would put you in jail, no problem


wrote in message
...
My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?

nm

That is not what I said. My ex hubby makes 40,000 a year and doesnt
pay a child support amount that was determined when he made 20,000 a
year.

I make MORE than he does, last year he paid 2,000 for support. Dont
tell me he cant "afford" it.

If I really wanted to be a bitch I could go in and ask that they raise
the amount to reflect the change in his income.

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:43:27 -0500, "Dusty" wrote:

Hello Jon,

Humm... let me see if I understand what you're saying...

We have FFK's X-hubby, who doesn't make enough money to cover his full CS
award AND keep a roof over his head nor food on the table, or gas in the
car. And your solution is to lock him up because he can't cover the cost of
all his obligations?

Is this correct?

"Jon" wrote in message
news:N4Vrb.165813$Fm2.144359@attbi_s04...
and I would put you in jail, no problem


wrote in message
...
My guess is FFK is a gal whose ex is 15k in the bucket on his CS, and
has an axe to grind with any man who gets a dime behind in his CS.
If I were her ex, she wouldn't get a dime.
Probably is a lousy mother, and was even a worse wife. I'd sit in jail
first.

Am I close?

nm