If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
VAWA is on the move again...
Well, boys and girls, it looks like VAWA is about to get passed, again. So,
once again, it's Duck and Cover time for men in the US for another 5 years. And another 5 years of BILLIONS in wasted taxpayer dollars to fund programs that are designed, from the get-go, to destroy families, vilify males every where and to push the anti-father feminazi agenda down the throats of anyone that will listen to their lies. Joy to the world. You know something, Cuba's starting to look pretty good right about now.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ http://mensnewsdaily.com/blog/2005/1...ses-senate.htm Wednesday, October 05, 2005 VAWA Passes Senate The United States senate has reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. The legislation, unpopular among men's groups, was passed by the Senate by Unanimous Consent on October 4, 2005. Men's Rights Activist Glenn Sacks was sanguine: "It says a great deal about the balance of power between the genders that a piece of legislation like VAWA--which has so many problems and is in such need of a close examination--could pass the Senate on unanimous consent." The noted Men's Rights Advocacy group Media Radar had expressed hope that the Senate would include "clear and explicit language" entitling men to the same level of Domestic Violence services as women, and to re-write the legislation to make it less hostile to male victims of domestic violence. Violence Against Women Act of 2005 (Reported in Senate) -- ------------------------------------------------------------- I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law. - Martin Luther King Jr. - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
VAWA is on the move again...
NOW is going to have other things on its plate very soon, if the judiciary ends up what it is shaping up to be. A repeal of Roe vs. Wade will focus women's groups' attention on things other than their current hobby of seeing how many pieces they can remove from fathers before they stop making funny noises. - Ron ^*^ Dusty wrote: Well, boys and girls, it looks like VAWA is about to get passed, again. So, once again, it's Duck and Cover time for men in the US for another 5 years. And another 5 years of BILLIONS in wasted taxpayer dollars to fund programs that are designed, from the get-go, to destroy families, vilify males every where and to push the anti-father feminazi agenda down the throats of anyone that will listen to their lies. Joy to the world. You know something, Cuba's starting to look pretty good right about now.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ http://mensnewsdaily.com/blog/2005/1...ses-senate.htm Wednesday, October 05, 2005 VAWA Passes Senate The United States senate has reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. The legislation, unpopular among men's groups, was passed by the Senate by Unanimous Consent on October 4, 2005. Men's Rights Activist Glenn Sacks was sanguine: "It says a great deal about the balance of power between the genders that a piece of legislation like VAWA--which has so many problems and is in such need of a close examination--could pass the Senate on unanimous consent." The noted Men's Rights Advocacy group Media Radar had expressed hope that the Senate would include "clear and explicit language" entitling men to the same level of Domestic Violence services as women, and to re-write the legislation to make it less hostile to male victims of domestic violence. Violence Against Women Act of 2005 (Reported in Senate) -- ------------------------------------------------------------- I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law. - Martin Luther King Jr. - |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
VAWA is on the move again...
"Werebat" wrote in message
news:GV01f.4376$GO4.1491@lakeread04... NOW is going to have other things on its plate very soon, if the judiciary ends up what it is shaping up to be. A repeal of Roe vs. Wade will focus women's groups' attention on things other than their current hobby of seeing how many pieces they can remove from fathers before they stop making funny noises. With any luck they'll never figure out how to multi-task.. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Senate Puts Off Vote on Controversial VAWA | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | October 2nd 05 06:56 PM |
"D.C. Children's Museum will move to waterfront" | Mike | General | 0 | May 18th 04 04:01 PM |
At 3:22 am mom & son | nancy | Pregnancy | 1 | December 20th 03 06:57 PM |