If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A lesson for Democrats
"I'm a person of faith, and here's who I am, and you're entitled to
know who I am because you ought to know about me, what's important to me." -- Timothy M. Kaine Catholic, Democrat & future Governor of Virginia Washington Post, Page A1 October 31, 2005 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A lesson for Democrats
Opinions wrote: "I'm a person of faith, and here's who I am, and you're entitled to know who I am because you ought to know about me, what's important to me." As a Catholic I doubt he's a conservative right wing Christian. In fact, I'd bet he's disgusted with you folks, and wouldn't trust you to mind a dog, let alone a child. -- Timothy M. Kaine Catholic, Democrat & future Governor of Virginia Washington Post, Page A1 October 31, 2005 I don't mind Christians being, like all others in this country, invited to the seats of power. I do though recognize the danger in extremists making their way to those power positions. And you don't really last all that long in power. Notice? Spanking's days are numbered. Trust me. I'll shed a tear for you. Then laugh my ass off at your stupidity and silliness, just as we recognize now how ugly and inhumane and devastating slavery, and the suppression and exploitation of women and children was to humankind. 0:- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A lesson for Democrats
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A lesson for Democrats
As a spin-off of feminist Marxism, proponents of no-spank are
frequently either atheist or have quasi-Marxist-atheist training such as that found in the typical college of education at a state university. It often flies under the radar as a radical demand for separation of church and state. Except for a few mouthpieces, most committed no-spanks are white females with some trappings of higher education. In fact, blacks often refer to no-spank as a *white-lady thing*! In truth, white matriarchal no-spank needs white patriarchal fundamentalism in order for their agenda to survive. The two extremes are actually locked in a type of cold war battle of the sexes in which they feed off of each other. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, lily-white socialist Sweden has become the new Valhalla for mostly white feminist ideology. It is the Promised Land. Meanwhile, if present demographic trends continue, liberal white females will be a definite minority in the United States shortly after 2050 rolls around. Their freedom from children and men in the wake of the 1960's sexual revolution is going to cost their precious agenda dearly. Doan wrote: On 9 Nov 2005 wrote: Opinions wrote: "I'm a person of faith, and here's who I am, and you're entitled to know who I am because you ought to know about me, what's important to me." As a Catholic I doubt he's a conservative right wing Christian. In fact, I'd bet he's disgusted with you folks, and wouldn't trust you to mind a dog, let alone a child. I don't think he minds you at all, Kane9 -9 = Kane0! ;-) Doan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
A lesson for Democrats
Opinions wrote: As a spin-off of feminist Marxism, proponents of no-spank are frequently either atheist or have quasi-Marxist-atheist training such as that found in the typical college of education at a state university. It often flies under the radar as a radical demand for separation of church and state. Please show your proof that those that are against spanking of children derive from Marxist or even feminist principles or teachings. Except for a few mouthpieces, most committed no-spanks are white females with some trappings of higher education. In fact, blacks often refer to no-spank as a *white-lady thing*! No they don't. And many blacks do not spank their children. The belief they do is derived from the public statements, not from research. More and more blacks have given it up as time passes. They see it for what it is, having been historically so close to it as adults. In truth, white matriarchal no-spank needs white patriarchal fundamentalism in order for their agenda to survive. Those that are against spanking would welcome with open arms the chance to lay down the battle and never have to speak of it again. Hence they don't "need" any such thing. The two extremes are actually locked in a type of cold war battle of the sexes in which they feed off of each other. The extremes might, but those with good sense do not. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, lily-white socialist Sweden has become the new Valhalla for mostly white feminist ideology. Lily white? They have the highest incident of immigrants of any of the nordic countries. 10% or more of their population are immigrants. You thrive on ignorance, don't you? It is the Promised Land. I presume for children, and their delighted parents who have seen the results of more humane parenting methods, yes, I'd say that's a fair description. Meanwhile, if present demographic trends continue, liberal white females will be a definite minority in the United States shortly after 2050 rolls around. All whites will be a minority. I presume any demographic that is labeled "white something" will go right along, because the minority non-white population, especially hispanic mixed, is growing at such a fast rate. Their freedom from children and men in the wake of the 1960's sexual revolution is going to cost their precious agenda dearly. Odd, women are still having babies, presumably using men for the process, at an astounding rate. Many wait until later, but that doesn't change the total numbers over time. And marriage is still around in my part of the country, as the preferred vehicle for having and raising children. You are pretty scared, aren't you? Not gettin' laid, I presume. It's fun to watch you break down from your baiting to out and out blathering propaganda ranting though. Keep it up. Nothing helps those of us that want an end to child assualts in the name of "discipline" than examples such as yourself. 0:- Doan wrote: On 9 Nov 2005 wrote: Opinions wrote: "I'm a person of faith, and here's who I am, and you're entitled to know who I am because you ought to know about me, what's important to me." As a Catholic I doubt he's a conservative right wing Christian. In fact, I'd bet he's disgusted with you folks, and wouldn't trust you to mind a dog, let alone a child. I don't think he minds you at all, Kane9 -9 = Kane0! ;-) Doan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
JUST UPLOADED ~ Free Spring 2004 Lesson Planning for the Classroom | AMONCO | Single Parents | 0 | March 13th 04 08:49 PM |
JUST UPLOADED ~ Free Spring 2004 Lesson Planning for the Classroom | AMONCO | Twins & Triplets | 0 | March 13th 04 08:48 PM |
Just Uploaded ~ Free Fall/Winter Montessori *Hands-On* Creative Lesson Planning Newsletters | Amonco8 | General | 0 | October 29th 03 04:38 PM |
Just Uploaded ~ Free Fall/Winter Montessori *Hands-On* Creative Lesson Planning Newsletters | Amonco9 | Solutions | 0 | October 29th 03 04:20 PM |
Free Fall Online Creative Lesson Planning Newsletters | AMONCO | General | 0 | September 24th 03 02:11 AM |