Hooray!

"Cele" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 01:11:53 GMT, 'Kate
wrote:

On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 18:06:02 -0700, "xkatx"
wrote:


http://www.thelaboroflove.com/chart/cal.html

There's the link. For some creepy reason, it seems to be pretty accurate
for my family and all that... Very strange... See how many match up with
you
and your family... It's easy to use. Intructions are right on the link,
but
just go by the age the mom is or was, and then go to the month of
conception. hehe... I had fun asking friends and all that about them and
their moms and all that.

It got my younger two right but not my oldest. The scariest part of
that chart is that it shows up to maternal age 45.

'Kate

It got my two and my mom's two all right.

Cele

All three of my mom's were right, but mine was wrong.

Betsy

"xkatx" wrote in message
...

"Tiffany" wrote in message
...

"xkatx" wrote in message
...

"'Kate" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:49:07 -0700, "xkatx"

snip


http://www.thelaboroflove.com/chart/cal.html

There's the link. For some creepy reason, it seems to be pretty accurate
for my family and all that... Very strange... See how many match up with you
and your family... It's easy to use. Intructions are right on the link, but
just go by the age the mom is or was, and then go to the month of
conception. hehe... I had fun asking friends and all that about them and
their moms and all that.

I have 2 children, and it was wrong on both :-(

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?