deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)

Kenneth S. wrote:
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it
is
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
Is it possible to stop trying to bash custodial parents, and allow one of
these threads to just have replies relevant to the topic?

I've been following this group for more than 10 years. As I see it, one
of the group's functions is to provide those who read it with a wider
perspective on the issue of "child support" (a payment that I try to
remember always to put in quote marks, because the money isn't to support
children--very obviously, the money is intended to support the mothers of
the children in question). The wider perspective available here isn't to be
found in the media in the U.S., because the media is almost universally
feminist and politically correct in outlook.

Here's one element in the wider perspective. "He should not be held
responsible for having sex, only I should," you say. So "child
support"--which is money you want to get from him--is a penalty for having
sex? There's a name for those who get paid for having sex, and another name
for those who pay to have sex. Those who pay to have sex are called "johns"
by law enforcement. You may not want to think about the name assigned to
those who accept payment for having sex.

The simple truth about "child support" is that the rules all are derived
from the fact that men pay it and women receive it. If any significant
number of women had to pay it, the system would look ENTIRELY different.
Also, there are indications in the research that there would be fewer
divorces and fatherless families if women thought there was any danger that
they would have to pay CS, not receive it.
That is not true. There are a lot of men that are custodial parents, and the
women are requeired to pay child support. If the rule is in fact derived from
the simple fact men pay and women get, then the term would be mother and
father, not custodial parent and non custodial parent.

--
Message posted via FamilyKB.com
http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1

"Illiana" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:7996cd2fa0c2c@uwe...
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it
is
about child support? Is it possible for them to gripe anymore about
something
that is in place to help single parents take care of their children?
I wonder why those people are so adamant about not paying child support.
They
all claim not to be deadbeats, or enablers, yet their comments, way of
thinking, and bashing of the custodial parents tell a different story.

A good place to get DBP's noticed is

http://www.deadbeatparents.info

I posted my childrens father there, and it gives me a chance to share with
others.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:79ada21023616@uwe...
DB wrote:
"Shadow36" wrote in

I wonder why those people are so adamant about not paying child
support.

[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
What I find more Interesting Is why this whackjob keeps making names up
and posting the same crap over and over.

She's on most people's kill file list, so her posts don't get read unless
she comes up with a new name each time she posts.

I just use her for entertainment as she's kept the board lively with her
rhetoric! LOL

She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL

On Usenet, you can be anything you want, even a law enforcement clerk
working 70 hours per week! LOL

I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file
list,

Uh, people do know whether or not they killfiled you--blocked your posts
from coming to their computers.

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:79ada35a0d518@uwe...
Gini wrote:
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when
it
is
about child support?
===
Because you are crossposting to our usenet group.
It's NOT your group.

OK, to rephrase: Because you are crossposting to ACS on usenet?

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:79addffe777f7@uwe...
Kenneth S. wrote:
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when
it
is
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
Is it possible to stop trying to bash custodial parents, and allow one
of
these threads to just have replies relevant to the topic?

I've been following this group for more than 10 years. As I see it,
one
of the group's functions is to provide those who read it with a wider
perspective on the issue of "child support" (a payment that I try to
remember always to put in quote marks, because the money isn't to support
children--very obviously, the money is intended to support the mothers of
the children in question). The wider perspective available here isn't to
be
found in the media in the U.S., because the media is almost universally
feminist and politically correct in outlook.

Here's one element in the wider perspective. "He should not be held
responsible for having sex, only I should," you say. So "child
support"--which is money you want to get from him--is a penalty for having
sex? There's a name for those who get paid for having sex, and another
name
for those who pay to have sex. Those who pay to have sex are called
"johns"
by law enforcement. You may not want to think about the name assigned to
those who accept payment for having sex.

The simple truth about "child support" is that the rules all are
derived
from the fact that men pay it and women receive it. If any significant
number of women had to pay it, the system would look ENTIRELY different.
Also, there are indications in the research that there would be fewer
divorces and fatherless families if women thought there was any danger
that
they would have to pay CS, not receive it.
That is not true. There are a lot of men that are custodial parents, and
the
women are requeired to pay child support. If the rule is in fact derived
from
the simple fact men pay and women get, then the term would be mother and
father, not custodial parent and non custodial parent.

The VAST MAJORITY of custodial parents are mothers. Unless the mother
really messed up or does not want custody, she will usually be granted
custody.

Why is the term for those who do not pay "deadbeat dad" rather than deadbeat
parent?

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL

On Usenet, you can be anything you want, even a law enforcement clerk
working 70 hours per week! LOL

I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file
list,

As you said, you are not computer savvy!

Lots of people read Usenet, but rarely post as they take a few minutes to
read things that are worthwhile!
They know the posters that are posting useful information, everything else
they filter out with an ignore list which eliminates a lot of the flack that
they just don't need to see.

By now they've figure out your posts are full of tripe, Arrest all the dead
beats, you keep beating the same old drum that previous Femwits used to
beat. They are gone now because nobody responded to them!

Right now you're just sparring with some of the long term regulars because
you provide some entertainment for them, they will soon tire of you and put
you on their Kill file list.

So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here
because nobody is reading it! :-)

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

The simple truth about "child support" is that the rules all are
derived
from the fact that men pay it and women receive it. If any significant
number of women had to pay it, the system would look ENTIRELY different.
Also, there are indications in the research that there would be fewer
divorces and fatherless families if women thought there was any danger
that
they would have to pay CS, not receive it.


That is not true. There are a lot of men that are custodial parents, and
the
women are requeired to pay child support.

And you know this how or are you just pulling that out of your ass!
Did the government tell you that? LOL

When you want a healthy debate, debate with the facts!
look at real numbers before you spout such rhetoric!!!!

If the rule is in fact derived from
the simple fact men pay and women get, then the term would be mother and
father, not custodial parent and non custodial parent.

You are dealing with a government system, there is no individuality, just a
case number!

"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message
news:79ada35a0d518@uwe...
Gini wrote:
Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when
it
is
about child support?
===
Because you are crossposting to our usenet group.
It's NOT your group.

OK, to rephrase: Because you are crossposting to ACS on usenet?
==
I've concluded that she doesn't even know what Usenet is.

"DB" wrote in message
...

"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in

She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL

On Usenet, you can be anything you want, even a law enforcement clerk
working 70 hours per week! LOL

I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file
list,

As you said, you are not computer savvy!

Lots of people read Usenet, but rarely post as they take a few minutes to
read things that are worthwhile!
They know the posters that are posting useful information, everything else
they filter out with an ignore list which eliminates a lot of the flack
that they just don't need to see.

By now they've figure out your posts are full of tripe, Arrest all the
dead beats, you keep beating the same old drum that previous Femwits used
to beat. They are gone now because nobody responded to them!

Right now you're just sparring with some of the long term regulars because
you provide some entertainment for them, they will soon tire of you and
put you on their Kill file list.

So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here
because nobody is reading it! :-)
==
She doesn't know where "here," is--She thinks "here" is there (FamilyKB).

"Gini" wrote in

So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here
because nobody is reading it! :-)
==
She doesn't know where "here," is--She thinks "here" is there (FamilyKB).

And that's a forum website with about 3 people! LOL